What is the recommended treatment for a patient with a history of ureteral stone, specifically POMU (proximal obstructing ureteral stone) with stone, found during ureteroscopy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 19, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ureteroscopic Management of Proximal Obstructing Ureteral Stones

When ureteroscopy reveals a proximal obstructing ureteral stone (POMU), proceed with ureteroscopic lithotripsy using holmium:YAG laser fragmentation, which achieves an 81% stone-free rate for proximal ureteral stones regardless of size. 1

Primary Treatment Approach

Flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy is the recommended definitive treatment for proximal ureteral stones discovered during ureteroscopy, as this modality is now deemed appropriate for stones of any size in the proximal ureter. 1

Key Technical Considerations:

  • Use flexible ureteroscopy over rigid/semirigid instruments for proximal stones, as flexible URS achieves superior stone-free rates (87% vs 77%) 1
  • Holmium:YAG laser is the preferred lithotripsy device due to minimal tissue penetration and effectiveness across all stone compositions 1, 2
  • Stone-free rates show minimal variation by size: 93% for stones ≤10 mm and 87% for stones >10 mm 1

Laser Settings Strategy

You have two effective approaches for laser lithotripsy:

Fragmentation with Extraction

  • High energy, low frequency settings to create larger fragments for active basket retrieval 2
  • Advantage: More complete initial stone clearance with active removal of all visible fragments 2
  • Disadvantage: Slightly longer procedure time and marginally higher risk of ureteral injury 2

Dusting Technique

  • Low energy, high frequency settings to create very small fragments that pass spontaneously 2
  • Advantage: Shorter procedure times and lower risk of ureteral damage 2
  • Disadvantage: Potential for residual stone debris if not all particles are expelled 2

Management of Impacted Stones

If the stone is impacted (common with chronic obstruction):

  • Small caliber ureteroscopes (6.9-7.5Fr) with laser lithotripsy achieve 96-100% success rates for impacted stones 3
  • Expect associated findings: inflammatory polyps (21%) and adjacent strictures (15%) 3
  • Chronically impacted stones benefit from endoscopic lithotripsy as first-line therapy rather than repeated SWL attempts 3

Alternative Approaches for Specific Scenarios

When Retrograde Access Fails or Stone is Very Large (>15mm) and Impacted:

Consider percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy for very large impacted proximal ureteral stones, which achieves 85-100% stone-free rates with acceptable complication rates comparable to other percutaneous procedures. 1

When Both URS and SWL Have Failed:

Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is preferred over open surgery for very large, impacted, or multiple stones where endoscopic approaches have failed, though this is rarely necessary. 1

Critical Safety Points

  • Complication rates for modern URS are low: ureteral perforation <5%, long-term stricture formation ≤2% 1
  • Proper technique is more important than equipment for successful outcomes 1
  • Stone displacement into the kidney can be managed using nitinol baskets (1.9-3.2Fr) to reposition stones into more favorable locations for fragmentation 4, 5

Expected Outcomes

  • Overall stone-free rate: 81% after single procedure for proximal ureteral stones 1
  • Vast majority of patients rendered stone-free in a single procedure 1
  • Additional procedures required infrequently (0.62 procedures per patient on average) 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.