Differential Diagnosis of Spindle Cell Neoplasms of the Breast
Spindle cell lesions of the breast comprise a heterogeneous group ranging from reactive processes to aggressive malignancies, requiring systematic categorization into bland-appearing versus malignant-appearing lesions to guide diagnostic workup and immunohistochemical panel selection. 1
Diagnostic Approach
The key to diagnosis is first separating these lesions into two main morphological categories, as this determines the differential diagnosis list and appropriate immunohistochemical workup 1, 2:
Bland-Appearing Spindle Cell Lesions
Benign entities:
- Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH) - myofibroblastic proliferation with slit-like pseudovascular spaces 3
- Nodular fasciitis - reactive myofibroblastic proliferation that can mimic malignancy 1, 3
- Myofibroblastoma - benign mesenchymal tumor with variable adipose tissue 3, 4
- Fibromatosis (desmoid tumor) - locally aggressive fibroblastic proliferation 1, 3
- Reactive spindle cell nodule - post-procedural reactive process 3
- Scar tissue - must be distinguished from fibromatosis 1
Critical malignant mimic:
- Fibromatosis-like spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma - low-grade malignancy that morphologically resembles benign fibromatosis and represents the most important diagnostic pitfall in this category 1, 3
Malignant-Appearing Spindle Cell Lesions
Primary malignancies:
- Spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma (high-grade) - epithelial malignancy with sarcomatoid features 1, 2
- Malignant phyllodes tumor (stroma-rich) - biphasic tumor with malignant stromal overgrowth 1, 2
- Primary angiosarcoma - vascular malignancy with spindle cell morphology 1
- Primary sarcomas - including undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma 1, 2
Metastatic malignancies:
Benign mimics of malignancy:
- Florid granulation tissue - exuberant reactive process that can appear alarming 1
- Nodular fasciitis - can have concerning mitotic activity 1, 3
Rare Entities with Specific Molecular Features
Secretory carcinoma of the breast - rare subtype (<0.02% of breast cancers) with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion in >90% of cases, characterized by spindle to epithelioid cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and secretory material 5
Diagnostic Workup Strategy
For bland-appearing lesions:
- The critical distinction is identifying fibromatosis-like metaplastic carcinoma among benign mimics 1
- Cytokeratin immunostains are essential to exclude epithelial differentiation 1, 2
- CD34, desmin, smooth muscle actin, and S100 help subclassify benign entities 4
For malignant-appearing lesions:
- Broad immunohistochemical panel including cytokeratins, vascular markers (CD31, CD34, ERG), melanoma markers (S100, SOX10, HMB45), and myogenic markers 1, 2
- Clinical history is crucial to exclude metastatic disease 1, 6
Core needle biopsy limitations:
- Spindle cell lesions are particularly challenging on limited tissue samples due to overlapping morphology 1, 2
- Radiological-pathological correlation is essential for accurate diagnosis 6
- Excisional biopsy may be required for definitive diagnosis when core biopsy is indeterminate 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
The fibromatosis-like metaplastic carcinoma trap: This low-grade malignancy can be misdiagnosed as benign fibromatosis or scar tissue, leading to inadequate treatment; always perform cytokeratin stains on bland spindle cell lesions 1, 3
Nodular fasciitis overdiagnosis: Despite brisk mitotic activity and cellular atypia, this is a self-limited reactive process; clinical history of recent trauma or procedure is key 1, 3
Inadequate sampling: The heterogeneous nature of these lesions means core biopsy may not capture diagnostic areas; maintain low threshold for excisional biopsy 1, 2