What are the key differentials for a patient presenting with a spindle cell neoplasm of the breast?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 19, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Differential Diagnosis of Spindle Cell Neoplasms of the Breast

Spindle cell lesions of the breast comprise a heterogeneous group ranging from reactive processes to aggressive malignancies, requiring systematic categorization into bland-appearing versus malignant-appearing lesions to guide diagnostic workup and immunohistochemical panel selection. 1

Diagnostic Approach

The key to diagnosis is first separating these lesions into two main morphological categories, as this determines the differential diagnosis list and appropriate immunohistochemical workup 1, 2:

Bland-Appearing Spindle Cell Lesions

Benign entities:

  • Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH) - myofibroblastic proliferation with slit-like pseudovascular spaces 3
  • Nodular fasciitis - reactive myofibroblastic proliferation that can mimic malignancy 1, 3
  • Myofibroblastoma - benign mesenchymal tumor with variable adipose tissue 3, 4
  • Fibromatosis (desmoid tumor) - locally aggressive fibroblastic proliferation 1, 3
  • Reactive spindle cell nodule - post-procedural reactive process 3
  • Scar tissue - must be distinguished from fibromatosis 1

Critical malignant mimic:

  • Fibromatosis-like spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma - low-grade malignancy that morphologically resembles benign fibromatosis and represents the most important diagnostic pitfall in this category 1, 3

Malignant-Appearing Spindle Cell Lesions

Primary malignancies:

  • Spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma (high-grade) - epithelial malignancy with sarcomatoid features 1, 2
  • Malignant phyllodes tumor (stroma-rich) - biphasic tumor with malignant stromal overgrowth 1, 2
  • Primary angiosarcoma - vascular malignancy with spindle cell morphology 1
  • Primary sarcomas - including undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma 1, 2

Metastatic malignancies:

  • Metastatic melanoma - can present as spindle cell lesion 1
  • Metastatic sarcomas from other sites 1

Benign mimics of malignancy:

  • Florid granulation tissue - exuberant reactive process that can appear alarming 1
  • Nodular fasciitis - can have concerning mitotic activity 1, 3

Rare Entities with Specific Molecular Features

Secretory carcinoma of the breast - rare subtype (<0.02% of breast cancers) with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion in >90% of cases, characterized by spindle to epithelioid cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and secretory material 5

Diagnostic Workup Strategy

For bland-appearing lesions:

  • The critical distinction is identifying fibromatosis-like metaplastic carcinoma among benign mimics 1
  • Cytokeratin immunostains are essential to exclude epithelial differentiation 1, 2
  • CD34, desmin, smooth muscle actin, and S100 help subclassify benign entities 4

For malignant-appearing lesions:

  • Broad immunohistochemical panel including cytokeratins, vascular markers (CD31, CD34, ERG), melanoma markers (S100, SOX10, HMB45), and myogenic markers 1, 2
  • Clinical history is crucial to exclude metastatic disease 1, 6

Core needle biopsy limitations:

  • Spindle cell lesions are particularly challenging on limited tissue samples due to overlapping morphology 1, 2
  • Radiological-pathological correlation is essential for accurate diagnosis 6
  • Excisional biopsy may be required for definitive diagnosis when core biopsy is indeterminate 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

The fibromatosis-like metaplastic carcinoma trap: This low-grade malignancy can be misdiagnosed as benign fibromatosis or scar tissue, leading to inadequate treatment; always perform cytokeratin stains on bland spindle cell lesions 1, 3

Nodular fasciitis overdiagnosis: Despite brisk mitotic activity and cellular atypia, this is a self-limited reactive process; clinical history of recent trauma or procedure is key 1, 3

Inadequate sampling: The heterogeneous nature of these lesions means core biopsy may not capture diagnostic areas; maintain low threshold for excisional biopsy 1, 2

References

Research

Spindle cell lesions of the breast: a diagnostic approach.

Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2022

Research

An algorithmic approach to spindle cell lesions of the breast.

Advances in anatomic pathology, 2013

Research

Benign and malignant spindle cell lesions of the breast.

Seminars in diagnostic pathology, 2004

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.