What is the typical timeline for a patient with type 1 diabetes to obtain a Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) and insulin pump?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 19, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Timeline for Obtaining CGM and Insulin Pump in Type 1 Diabetes

The evidence does not provide specific timelines for how long it takes to obtain a CGM or insulin pump, as this is primarily determined by insurance authorization processes, healthcare system logistics, and individual clinic workflows rather than clinical guidelines.

What the Guidelines Actually Address

The available clinical practice guidelines focus on when and for whom these technologies should be prescribed, not how long the acquisition process takes 1, 2.

CGM Recommendations

All patients with type 1 diabetes should use continuous glucose monitoring, regardless of age or current glycemic control 2. The American Diabetes Association specifically recommends:

  • Real-time CGM in conjunction with intensive insulin regimens is a useful tool to lower HbA1c levels and/or reduce hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes who are not meeting glycemic targets, have hypoglycemia unawareness, and/or have episodes of hypoglycemia 1
  • CGM should be considered in all children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes, whether using injections or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion 1
  • When prescribing CGM, robust diabetes education, training, and support are required for optimal implementation and ongoing use 1

Insulin Pump Recommendations

Intensive insulin management using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and continuous glucose monitoring should be considered in most individuals with type 1 diabetes 1. The evidence shows:

  • Sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy has modest advantages for lowering A1C (0.30% reduction) and reducing severe hypoglycemia rates in children and adults 1
  • Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems may be considered in individuals with type 1 diabetes who are capable of using the device safely to improve time in range and reduce A1C and hypoglycemia 1
  • The greatest improvements in glycemic control were seen for sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy in patients with poorly controlled diabetes who had not used an insulin pump before 3

Real-World Implementation Considerations

Prerequisites Before Device Acquisition

Before obtaining either device, patients must demonstrate readiness and receive comprehensive education 1, 2:

  • Assessment of individual readiness to use the technology 1
  • Ability to perform self-monitoring of blood glucose for calibration (device-dependent) and verification of readings 1
  • Willingness and ability to learn the basic mechanical skills of the equipment 2
  • Systematic training is essential for retention and success of use 4

Common Barriers to Timely Access

The research literature identifies several barriers that can delay device acquisition 5:

  • Cost and variable reimbursement across insurance plans 5
  • Lack of fair and reasonable reimbursement for physician time 5
  • Inexperience and lack of training of physicians and other healthcare professionals 5
  • Need for professional medical organizations to develop and disseminate additional clinical practice guidelines 5

Practical Clinical Approach

In clinical practice, the timeline typically depends on:

  1. Insurance authorization process - This is the primary rate-limiting step, though not addressed in clinical guidelines
  2. Completion of required diabetes education - Robust training is mandatory before device initiation 1
  3. Device availability and supplier logistics - Not addressed in medical literature
  4. Clinic scheduling for device training - Systematic training protocols are essential 4

Critical Caveat

Patients who have been using continuous glucose monitors should have continued access across third-party payers 1, suggesting that insurance transitions can create access delays even for established users.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Continuous glucose monitoring systems for type 1 diabetes mellitus.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012

Research

INTEGRATED INSULIN PUMP AND CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING TECHNOLOGY IN DIABETES CARE TODAY: A PERSPECTIVE OF REAL-LIFE EXPERIENCE WITH THE MINIMED™ 670G HYBRID CLOSED-LOOP SYSTEM.

Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.