What is the minimum Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) wave voltage amplitude for wave V to be considered clear in adults and children?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 20, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Minimum ABR Wave Voltage Amplitude for Clear Wave Identification

There is no universally defined minimum voltage amplitude threshold in clinical guidelines for determining when an ABR wave is "clear" - instead, clinical interpretation focuses on wave reproducibility, morphology, and the presence of consistent peak latencies rather than absolute amplitude values. 1

Key Principles for Wave Identification

Wave Reliability Standards

  • Waves I, III, and V are the constant and reproducible markers used for clinical interpretation in both adults and children, while waves II, IV, VI, and VII are variable and frequently asymmetrical or absent. 2

  • Wave V is the most clinically important landmark and should be clearly detectable at 60 dB peak equivalent SPL in 82% of neonates and 100% of older infants and children when using headphone technique. 3

  • The focus in clinical practice is on wave reproducibility across repeated trials rather than meeting a specific amplitude threshold - a wave is considered "clear" when it can be consistently identified at the same latency across multiple averaged responses. 1, 2

Amplitude Considerations and Variability

  • Wave amplitude alone is not a reliable measure of normality in ABR interpretation, as amplitudes show significant intra- and inter-subject variability. 2

  • Amplitude values are affected by multiple factors including stimulus delivery method (free field vs. headphone), with free field recordings producing higher Wave V amplitudes than headphone delivery. 3

  • Peak latencies and interpeak conduction times are far more clinically relevant than absolute amplitude measurements for determining hearing thresholds and identifying pathology. 2, 1

Clinical Application for Diagnostic ABR

Frequency-Specific Testing Requirements

  • For diagnostic ABR in infants birth to 6 months, testing should include frequency-specific ABR using air-conducted tone bursts to determine degree and configuration of hearing loss for amplification fitting. 1

  • Click-evoked ABR using both condensation and rarefaction stimuli is required to determine if a cochlear microphonic is present, particularly in infants with risk factors for auditory neuropathy. 1

Wave V Detection Thresholds

  • In neonates (gestational age 36-41 weeks), Wave V is detectable at 60 dB in 82% using headphone technique and 78% using free field technique. 3

  • In children older than 6 months, Wave V should be clearly detectable at 60 dB in 100% of cases with normal hearing. 3

  • Normal reference values for tone-burst ABR response thresholds vary by age: infants 0-12 months show higher thresholds (27.25 ± 9.47 dBnHL at 0.5 kHz) compared to children 37-48 months (18.25 ± 5.83 dBnHL at 0.5 kHz). 4

Important Clinical Caveats

Age-Related Differences

  • ABR waveform morphology changes with age - in the first 6 months only three waves are typically visible, while the typical 4-5 waves of adult tracings become detectable at 8-12 months of age. 3

  • Wave V latency values in neonates and young infants (0-6 months) are statistically different from older children, with longer latencies in younger age groups. 3, 4

Testing Conditions

  • Automated ABR screening uses 35 dB near hearing level clicks and provides pass/fail results without requiring amplitude interpretation. 5

  • For diagnostic purposes, testing across multiple intensity levels is essential, as interpeak conduction times (not amplitudes) are the primary diagnostic parameters and remain stable across different stimulus intensities. 2

  • Standard test-retest variability for ABR typically fluctuates by ±5 dB, so changes less than 10 dB may not represent true threshold shifts. 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Normal variability of the brain-stem auditory evoked response in young and old adult subjects.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 1978

Research

Automated auditory brainstem response in neonatal hearing screening.

Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992). Supplement, 1999

Guideline

Grading and Evaluating Hearing Loss

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.