What is the recommended treatment for a 12-year-old patient with an avulsion fracture of the tibial tuberosity?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 20, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Avulsion Fracture of Tibial Tuberosity in a 12-Year-Old

Displaced tibial tuberosity avulsion fractures in a 12-year-old require open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) to restore the extensor mechanism and prevent long-term complications. 1, 2

Initial Diagnostic Approach

  • Obtain standard knee radiographs (anteroposterior and lateral views) as the initial imaging study to assess fragment size, displacement degree, and potential intra-articular extension 3
  • Test active knee extension immediately—inability to actively extend the knee indicates patellar ligament avulsion, which mandates surgical intervention 4
  • If patellar ligament avulsion is suspected, obtain lateral radiographs in both flexion and extension; the distance between the distal patella and avulsed fragment will increase during flexion 4

Fracture Classification and Treatment Algorithm

Ogden Classification System

The classification determines treatment approach 1, 2:

  • Type I: Avulsion of distal ossification center

    • Type IA (non-displaced): Cast immobilization acceptable
    • Type IB (displaced/comminuted): ORIF required 1
  • Type II: Upward angulation of fragment at secondary ossification center junction

    • Type IIA (non-displaced): Cast immobilization acceptable
    • Type IIB (displaced): ORIF required 1
  • Type III: Fracture extends into knee joint (intra-articular)

    • Type IIIA and IIIB: Closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) should be attempted first 1
    • If CRIF fails to achieve anatomic reduction under fluoroscopy, proceed to ORIF 1

Surgical Technique Selection

For displaced extra-articular fractures (Types IB, IIA):

  • ORIF is necessary using interfragmental transphyseal screws 4, 2
  • At age 12, the proximal tibial physis is approaching closure, making transphyseal screw fixation safe 4

For intra-articular fractures (Types IIIA, IIIB):

  • Attempt CRIF first under fluoroscopic guidance 1
  • Anatomic reduction of the articular surface is the primary goal 2
  • If adequate reduction cannot be achieved closed, proceed immediately to ORIF 1
  • Consider tension band wiring if extensive comminution is present 4

For patellar ligament avulsion (Type C):

  • ORIF with trans-osseous suture repair of the ligament 4
  • Protect the ligament repair with tension band passed above patella and distally into tibia 4
  • Remove protective tension band at 6 weeks 4

Critical Technical Points

  • Achieve anatomic reduction when the fracture extends into the joint surface to prevent post-traumatic arthritis 2
  • Use fluoroscopy intraoperatively to confirm reduction quality and hardware position 1
  • If the avulsed fragment is too small or comminuted for screw fixation, use suture bridge technique or tension band wiring 5, 4

Postoperative Rehabilitation

  • Begin protected range of motion between 0-60 degrees within the first week if tension band protection is used 4
  • Remove protective tension band at 6 weeks to allow full rehabilitation 4
  • Weight-bearing progression depends on fracture stability and fixation method 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not treat displaced fractures conservatively—this leads to extensor lag and chronic disability 4, 2
  • Do not miss associated patellar ligament avulsion in Type I and II fractures; always test active extension 4
  • Do not accept non-anatomic reduction in intra-articular fractures (Type III)—this causes long-term joint dysfunction 2
  • Be aware that pre-existing Osgood-Schlatter disease may predispose to this injury and affect bone quality 6

Expected Outcomes

  • With accurate reduction and sound fixation, uncomplicated union without deformity occurs in the vast majority of cases 2
  • All patients should achieve full function with appropriate surgical management 1, 2
  • Growth disturbance is rare at this age given proximity to physeal closure 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.