Hiatal Hernia Imaging
Primary Recommendation
For suspected hiatal hernia, obtain a biphasic esophagram (double-contrast upper GI series) as the initial imaging study, which achieves 88% sensitivity and provides both anatomic and functional information about the hernia, esophageal length, strictures, and gastroesophageal reflux. 1, 2
Initial Imaging Algorithm
First-Line: Fluoroscopic Studies
The American College of Radiology designates fluoroscopic studies as "usually appropriate" for initial imaging of suspected hiatal hernia, with three equivalent options: 1
Biphasic esophagram - Combines double-contrast views (optimizes detection of inflammatory conditions and mucosal abnormalities) with single-contrast views (optimizes detection of hiatal hernias, esophageal rings, and strictures), achieving the highest sensitivity of 88% 1, 2
Double-contrast upper GI series - Most useful test for diagnosing hiatal hernia presence and size, providing anatomic and functional information on esophageal length, strictures, gastroesophageal reflux, and reflux esophagitis with 80% sensitivity 1, 2
Single-contrast esophagram - May delineate the hernia and reveal reflux, lower esophageal rings, or strictures, though it cannot reveal mucosal irregularities from reflux disease (77% sensitivity) 1
For large hiatal hernias, include a complete upper GI series evaluation of the stomach to assess hernia size and subtype. 1, 2
When to Use CT Scan
CT scan with IV contrast is NOT first-line for uncomplicated hiatal hernia but becomes the gold standard for complicated or emergency presentations: 1, 2
Use contrast-enhanced CT of chest and abdomen when:
CT findings indicating complications include: 3
- Absence of gastric wall contrast enhancement (ischemia)
- Intestinal wall thickening with target enhancement
- Diaphragmatic discontinuity, "collar sign", "dependent viscera" sign
CT has 14-82% sensitivity and 87% specificity for complicated diaphragmatic hernias, superior for determining presence, location, and size of diaphragmatic defects. 2, 3
Critical Caveats and Pitfalls
Avoid These Common Errors
Do NOT order CT as first-line imaging - Fluoroscopic studies are more appropriate and informative for uncomplicated hiatal hernia 1, 2, 3
Do NOT use non-contrast CT - It provides limited assessment of vascular structures and cannot adequately visualize complications like ischemia or strangulation 3
Do NOT rely on chest X-ray alone - Normal chest radiographs occur in 11-62% of diaphragmatic hernias, with sensitivity of only 2-60% 1, 3
Do NOT skip barium studies before antireflux surgery - The American College of Surgeons' Esophageal Diagnostic Advisory Panel recommends all patients being considered for antireflux surgery undergo barium esophagogram 2
Diagnostic Discordance
Research reveals significant discordance between imaging modalities: 4, 5, 6
- Barium swallow shows no correlation with manometry or endoscopy findings, though it provides the highest detection rate (76.8%) 4
- Endoscopy has 97.5% detection rate versus barium swallow's 75% when correlated with intraoperative findings 6
- High-resolution manometry has better specificity (95%) than endoscopy (68%) but similar poor sensitivity (52% vs 55%) 5
Because of high false-negative rates across all modalities, negative results by any single test mandate additional testing before excluding hiatal hernia. 5
Special Populations
Pregnant Patients
For pregnant patients with suspected non-traumatic diaphragmatic hernia: 1, 3
- First: Ultrasonography (avoids radiation)
- Second: MRI if ultrasonography is inconclusive
Trauma Patients
For stable trauma patients with suspected diaphragmatic hernia: 1
- Contrast-enhanced CT scan of chest and abdomen (strong recommendation)
- For lower chest penetrating wounds: diagnostic laparoscopy
Preoperative Evaluation
All patients being considered for antireflux surgery require: 2
- Barium esophagogram (mandatory per American College of Surgeons)
- Endoscopy (to evaluate for esophagitis, strictures, Barrett's esophagus)
- Consider manometry if motility disorder suspected