What was the purpose of the ACCESS trial for community-acquired pneumonia in adult patients?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 21, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

The ACCESS Trial for Community-Acquired Pneumonia

I cannot identify any trial called "ACCESS" in the provided evidence related to community-acquired pneumonia. The evidence includes major guidelines from the American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America (2019,2001,2000), British Thoracic Society (2001), and various research studies, but none reference an ACCESS trial.

What the Evidence Does Contain

The provided guidelines and research discuss several important clinical trials and studies for CAP, but not ACCESS:

  • The Pneumonia Patient Outcome Research Team (Pneumonia PORT) developed the clinical prediction rule for short-term mortality and risk stratification into five severity classes 1

  • Falguera and colleagues (2007) conducted a randomized trial of 177 patients comparing pathogen-directed treatment based on urinary antigen testing versus empirical guideline-directed treatment, finding no statistical differences in death, clinical relapse, ICU admission, or length of hospitalization 1

  • ConsenSur I and II were South American working group guidelines for initial antimicrobial therapy based on local evidence, published in 2002 and updated in 2010 2, 3

Possible Explanations

The ACCESS trial may be:

  • Referenced under a different name in the pneumonia literature
  • A trial not included in the provided evidence base
  • Related to a different aspect of pneumonia management not covered in these guidelines
  • A trial from a different medical specialty or condition

If you can provide additional context about what aspect of pneumonia the ACCESS trial addressed (e.g., antibiotic selection, diagnostic approach, severity assessment), I can search for relevant information within the available evidence.

Related Questions

What are other considerations or management options for community-acquired pneumonia?
What are common questions about community-acquired pneumonia that seminar attendees may ask?
What is the recommended approach to treating community-acquired pneumonia in a typical adult patient with consideration of age, underlying health conditions, and immunization status?
Is fosfomycin a suitable alternative for a 77-year-old female patient with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who is allergic to Bactrim (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole)?
What is the initial treatment recommendation for patients diagnosed with pneumonia?
Can elevated Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) cause leukocytosis in a patient?
What is the role of lidocaine (a local anesthetic and anti-arrhythmic medication) in treating supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) that is unresponsive to initial treatments?
What is the likely diagnosis for a 13-year-old female patient with a history of emotional distress, neglect, and maltreatment, presenting with symptoms of anxiety, sadness, and guilt following a traumatic family conflict?
Is doxycycline (tetracycline antibiotic) a suitable treatment option for an adult patient with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP)?
How to differentiate and manage a patient with a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) presenting with symptoms suggestive of either Acute Vasculitis (AVWFS) or Clopidogrel-induced Purpura while on clopidogrel (Plavix) therapy?
What is the normal lab value for vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) in a typical adult patient?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.