Management of Positive ANA with DSF70 Pattern
A positive ANA with an isolated DSF70 pattern (confirmed by specific anti-DFS70 antibody testing) effectively excludes systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease and requires no further autoimmune workup or rheumatology referral. 1, 2
Understanding the DSF70 Pattern
The dense fine speckled 70 (DFS70) pattern represents antibodies against the DFS70/LEDGF-P75 antigen and is more commonly found in healthy individuals and non-autoimmune inflammatory conditions rather than systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD). 1
Anti-DFS70 antibodies serve as a negative biomarker for SARD, meaning their isolated presence argues against rather than for autoimmune disease. 2, 3
The prevalence of anti-DFS70 in healthy blood donors ranges from 0.59-0.78%, while it can be found in various non-autoimmune inflammatory conditions. 4
Critical Confirmation Step Required
The DFS70 pattern observed on indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) must be confirmed with a specific anti-DFS70 antibody test (ELISA or chemiluminescence assay) before concluding the result is clinically insignificant. 5, 6
Among sera showing a DFS70 pattern by IIF, only 30.4% are confirmed positive for anti-DFS70 antibodies by specific testing, meaning approximately 70% of apparent DFS70 patterns on IIF are false positives. 5
Without confirmation testing, you risk missing true SARD-associated autoantibodies that may produce a similar-appearing pattern on IIF. 5, 6
The HEp-2 Select immunoadsorption method can eliminate DFS70 interference in 95.7% of cases, revealing other autoantibody patterns that may be clinically significant. 5
Management Algorithm
If Anti-DFS70 is Confirmed Positive by Specific Testing:
Check for concomitant SARD-specific autoantibodies (anti-dsDNA, anti-ENA panel including anti-Sm, anti-RNP, anti-SSA/Ro, anti-SSB/La, anti-Scl-70, anti-Jo-1). 1, 6
If anti-DFS70 is isolated (no other SARD-specific antibodies present):
If anti-DFS70 is present WITH other SARD-specific autoantibodies:
If DFS70 Pattern on IIF is NOT Confirmed by Specific Testing:
- The IIF result represents a false positive DFS70 pattern 5
- Proceed with standard ANA workup based on the actual titer and any alternative patterns identified 1, 7
- Order specific ENA panel and anti-dsDNA testing as clinically indicated 1, 7
Clinical Significance and Cost-Effectiveness
In a 10-year follow-up study, none of the 181 patients with isolated anti-DFS70 antibodies developed SARD, confirming its negative predictive value. 3
Implementing anti-DFS70 testing in the diagnostic algorithm reduces unnecessary follow-up testing by approximately 70% and is highly cost-effective, saving over €60,000 in a pilot study through avoided ENA testing, anti-dsDNA testing, and outpatient visits. 3
Anti-DFS70 antibodies may be found in 7.5% of patients with established SARD, but virtually always in conjunction with other SARD-specific autoantibodies. 4
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Never rely on IIF pattern alone: The DFS70 pattern has a 70% false positive rate on IIF and must be confirmed with specific anti-DFS70 antibody testing. 5
Do not skip testing for SARD-specific autoantibodies: Even when anti-DFS70 is confirmed, you must verify the absence of concomitant SARD-specific antibodies, as 11.5% of DFS70-positive cases may have clinically significant autoantibodies. 6
Avoid unnecessary monitoring: Patients with isolated anti-DFS70 do not require serial ANA testing or rheumatology follow-up. 3
Consider the clinical context: Anti-DFS70 antibodies can be found in various inflammatory conditions (such as the acute glomerulonephritis case described), and their presence helps exclude autoimmune etiology for the presenting symptoms. 2