Is Staphylococcus saprophyticus a Common UTI Bacteria?
Yes, Staphylococcus saprophyticus is a common cause of UTIs, ranking as the second most frequent pathogen after E. coli in young, sexually active women, accounting for approximately 10-11% of all UTIs in this specific population. 1, 2, 3
Epidemiological Context
S. saprophyticus occupies a distinct niche in UTI microbiology:
- E. coli remains the dominant pathogen, causing approximately 75% of recurrent UTIs across all patient groups 1, 4
- S. saprophyticus is definitively the second most common cause of uncomplicated UTIs specifically in young, sexually active women, representing 10-11% of cases in this demographic 2, 5, 3
- The organism is listed among the "most other infections" after E. coli, alongside Enterococcus faecalis, Proteus mirabilis, and Klebsiella, particularly in patients with risk factors for complicated UTIs 1
Key Population Characteristics
The typical patient profile for S. saprophyticus UTI is highly specific:
- Mean age of infected patients is approximately 20-32 years 2, 6
- 83.9% of infections occur in women aged 15-44 years, including pregnant women 6
- The organism is rarely found in men (only 7 out of 331 cases in one 10-year study) 6
- Sexual activity is a major risk factor, with the organism showing pathogenesis similar to E. coli UTIs 3, 7
Seasonal and Clinical Patterns
S. saprophyticus demonstrates unique epidemiological features:
- Infections peak during late summer and early fall (particularly June and November) 6, 3
- Most cases present as acute cystitis, though frank pyelonephritis can occur 2
- 41% of infections may localize to the upper urinary tract (compared to 16% for E. coli), suggesting more aggressive behavior 3
- The organism is rarely found as a contaminant in urine cultures, making its presence clinically significant 2
Risk Factors
Specific exposures increase S. saprophyticus UTI risk:
- Spermicide-coated condom use is strongly associated with infection (OR 8.4-10.9 for frequent use), with 74% of S. saprophyticus UTIs attributable to this exposure among exposed women 7
- Younger age, higher intercourse frequency, and prior UTI history are independent predictors 7
- Mucocutaneous colonization (rectal, vaginal, urethral) with S. saprophyticus significantly associates with subsequent UTI 3
Clinical Significance
Important considerations for practice:
- The organism should be accepted as an important urinary tract pathogen in young female patients, not dismissed as a contaminant 2
- Signs, symptoms, and urinalysis findings are similar to E. coli infections, making clinical differentiation impossible without culture 3
- Recurrent infections can occur despite adequate therapy in some patients 3
- While rare, complicated UTIs including renal abscess can occur even in immunocompetent hosts without traditional risk factors 5
Common Pitfall to Avoid
Do not dismiss S. saprophyticus as skin flora contamination when isolated from urine cultures in young women—it is rarely a contaminant and represents true infection requiring treatment 2. The organism's presence should prompt consideration of spermicide exposure and counseling about alternative contraceptive methods 7.