What is the most appropriate next investigation for a patient presenting with progressive dyspnea (difficulty breathing) and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea (sudden shortness of breath at night), with echocardiography findings of hypokinesia (reduced movement) of the anterior wall and a significantly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 30%?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 21, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Coronary Angiography

Proceed directly to invasive coronary angiography—this is the most appropriate next investigation for this patient with severely reduced LVEF (30%), regional wall motion abnormality (anterior wall hypokinesia), and classic heart failure symptoms. 1

Rationale for Coronary Angiography

The clinical presentation strongly suggests ischemic cardiomyopathy as the underlying etiology:

  • Regional wall motion abnormality (anterior wall hypokinesia) indicates a regional rather than global dysfunction pattern, which is characteristic of coronary artery disease rather than non-ischemic cardiomyopathy 1
  • The combination of severely reduced LVEF, regional wall abnormality, and heart failure symptoms makes coronary artery disease the most likely cardiac cause 1, 2
  • Invasive catheter coronary angiography is the clinical gold standard to definitively diagnose coronary artery disease in patients with suspected ischemic cardiomyopathy 1

Why Not Other Options?

Myocardial perfusion imaging (Option A):

  • Delays definitive diagnosis when regional wall motion abnormalities are already present on echocardiography 1
  • Time to revascularization matters in ischemic cardiomyopathy, and delaying with non-invasive testing can negatively impact patient outcomes 1

CT coronary angiography (Option B):

  • Has excellent sensitivity but relatively low specificity in high-risk patients like this one 1
  • Less appropriate when definitive diagnosis is needed for treatment decisions 1
  • The American College of Radiology explicitly states that coronary angiography is the gold standard when ischemic heart disease needs to be definitively excluded or confirmed 1

Chest X-ray (Option D):

  • Already completed as part of initial evaluation 3
  • Does not provide information about coronary anatomy or guide revascularization decisions 1

Clinical Decision-Making

  • Revascularization decisions depend on identifying obstructive coronary disease, and coronary angiography is necessary for definitive anatomic assessment 1
  • Fractional flow reserve (FFR) can be performed during angiography to functionally assess lesion severity and guide revascularization decisions 1
  • This approach allows for both diagnosis and potential therapeutic intervention in a single procedure 1

Answer: C. Coronary angiography

References

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Cardiac-Related Diagnoses for Dyspnea

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach to Dyspnea on Exertion

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

What is the most appropriate next investigation for a patient presenting with progressive dyspnea (difficulty breathing) and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea (nighttime breathing difficulty), with echocardiography findings of hypokinesia (reduced movement) of the anterior wall and a significantly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 30%?
What is the next best investigation for a patient with progressive dyspnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, and an echocardiogram showing hypokinesia of the anterior wall and a left ventricle ejection fraction of 30%?
A patient with progressive dyspnea (shortness of breath) and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea (sudden shortness of breath at night) presents with echocardiogram findings of hypokinesia (reduced movement) of the anterior wall and a significantly reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) of 30%, what is the next best investigation?
What is the next best investigation for a patient with dyspnea and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, who has hypokinesia of the anterior wall and a left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) of 30% on echocardiogram?
What is the best next step for a patient with increasing paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, echocardiogram showing hypokinesia of the right wall and reduced ejection fraction, and no obvious STEMI (ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) on ECG (Electrocardiogram)?
What are the potential causes and recommended course of action for a patient experiencing a unilateral headache that radiates down the neck, with exacerbation of pain or pressure when in a supine position?
Is Loratadine (10mg twice daily) a suitable treatment option for a patient with generalized pruritus?
What is the most appropriate next investigation for a patient presenting with progressive dyspnea (difficulty breathing) and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea (sudden shortness of breath at night), with echocardiography findings of hypokinesia (reduced movement) of the anterior wall and a significantly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 30%?
What are the next steps for a toddler who develops a rash 2 days after stopping azithromycin (a macrolide antibiotic)?
What is the evidence-based approach to diagnosing and treating a patient with suspected hepatic encephalopathy and a history of liver disease?
Can a rash in a child who had pneumonia and was treated with azithromycin (a macrolide antibiotic) be related to the infection or the medication, or is it more likely a viral exanthem?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.