What is the recommended treatment approach for a patient with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and a FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 21, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment Overview for FLT3-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Risk Stratification and Prognostic Significance

FLT3 mutations occur in 25-30% of AML patients and confer intermediate to adverse risk, with FLT3-ITD (internal tandem duplication) affecting 19-25% of patients and FLT3-TKD (tyrosine kinase domain) mutations affecting 7-10%. 1, 2, 3 The presence of FLT3-ITD mutation is associated with higher relapse rates and poorer overall survival compared to FLT3-wildtype AML. 1, 2

  • FLT3-ITD mutations are more common (19-25% of cases) and typically confer worse prognosis than FLT3-TKD mutations (7-10% of cases). 1, 2
  • Both mutation types are more frequent in cytogenetically normal AML. 1
  • The allelic ratio of FLT3-ITD (high versus low) further stratifies risk, with high allelic ratios indicating worse outcomes. 4

Treatment Approach for Fit Patients Eligible for Intensive Therapy

For newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML patients who are candidates for intensive chemotherapy, the standard of care is cytarabine and daunorubicin induction (7+3 regimen) combined with midostaurin 50 mg orally twice daily on days 8-21 of each induction and consolidation cycle. 1, 5, 6

Induction Therapy

  • Administer standard-dose cytarabine (100-200 mg/m² continuous infusion for 7 days) combined with daunorubicin (60-90 mg/m² for 3 days). 1, 5, 7
  • Add midostaurin 50 mg orally twice daily with food on days 8-21 of induction, which improves 4-year overall survival by 7.1% to 51.4%. 5, 6
  • Midostaurin is FDA-approved specifically for FLT3-mutated AML and must be used in combination with chemotherapy, not as single-agent therapy. 6
  • Perform bone marrow evaluation 14-21 days after start of therapy to assess response. 1

Reinduction for Residual Disease

  • For patients with residual disease without hypoplasia after initial induction, administer additional standard-dose cytarabine with daunorubicin and midostaurin. 1
  • If daunorubicin 90 mg/m² was used in induction, reduce the reinduction dose to 45 mg/m² for no more than 2 doses. 1

Consolidation Therapy

  • Continue midostaurin 50 mg orally twice daily on days 8-21 of each consolidation cycle with high-dose cytarabine. 1, 6
  • For intermediate-risk FLT3-mutated AML (which includes most FLT3-ITD cases), proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) with HLA-matched sibling or unrelated donor if available. 5, 4
  • AlloHCT in first complete remission is recommended for FLT3-mutated AML due to high relapse risk without transplantation. 1
  • Identify potential donors early and aim to start conditioning within 4-6 weeks from start of induction therapy. 1

Treatment for Older or Unfit Patients

For patients aged ≥60 years or those not candidates for intensive chemotherapy, hypomethylating agents (HMAs) alone or in combination with sorafenib are recommended. 1

  • Administer azacitidine or decitabine as monotherapy, or combine with sorafenib (an FLT3 inhibitor). 1
  • In a phase II study, azacitidine combined with sorafenib achieved a 46% response rate in relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated AML, with CR/CRi rates of 43%. 1
  • Venetoclax combined with HMAs (azacitidine, decitabine, or low-dose cytarabine) is an alternative option for patients declining or unable to tolerate intensive therapy. 1
  • For newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML in older patients, azacitidine combined with gilteritinib achieved a CR/CRi rate of 67% in early trials. 1

Relapsed or Refractory FLT3-Mutated AML

For relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutated AML, gilteritinib monotherapy is superior to salvage chemotherapy and is the preferred treatment. 8

  • Gilteritinib, a highly specific second-generation FLT3 inhibitor, demonstrated significantly longer overall survival compared to salvage chemotherapy in the ADMIRAL trial. 8
  • Gilteritinib is generally well tolerated but requires monitoring for myelosuppression, QTc prolongation, and differentiation syndrome. 8, 9
  • Differentiation syndrome can occur early (even after a single dose) and may be severe, requiring prompt steroid therapy or steroid pulse therapy with additional chemotherapy if initial steroids are ineffective. 9
  • After achieving second remission with gilteritinib or salvage chemotherapy, proceed to alloHCT if feasible. 1

Post-Transplant Maintenance

Post-transplant maintenance therapy with FLT3 inhibitors can reduce relapse risk after allogeneic HCT. 1, 2

  • Consider FLT3 inhibitor maintenance therapy following alloHCT to prevent relapse, though optimal duration and agent selection remain areas of ongoing investigation. 1
  • Sorafenib and midostaurin have been studied in the post-transplant setting. 1

Monitoring and Follow-Up

  • Perform bone marrow morphology every 3 months for 24 months and differential blood counts every 3 months for 5 years after treatment. 5, 4
  • Assess measurable residual disease (MRD) after 2 cycles of chemotherapy and at end of treatment. 5
  • Monitor for FLT3 mutation status at relapse, as resistance mechanisms may emerge during FLT3 inhibitor therapy. 3, 10

Critical Considerations and Resistance Mechanisms

  • FLT3 inhibitor resistance can develop through FLT3-dependent mechanisms (secondary FLT3 mutations) or FLT3-independent mechanisms (activation of alternative signaling pathways). 3, 10
  • Midostaurin is not indicated as single-agent induction therapy and must be combined with chemotherapy. 6
  • Avoid strong CYP3A4 inducers with midostaurin as they decrease drug exposure; consider alternative therapies or monitor closely if strong CYP3A4 inhibitors are necessary. 6
  • Clinical trial enrollment should be considered whenever possible, particularly for novel FLT3 inhibitor combinations or strategies to overcome resistance. 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

A Review of FLT3 Kinase Inhibitors in AML.

Journal of clinical medicine, 2023

Guideline

Acute and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.