When to Perform Kidney Biopsy for Lupus Nephritis
Kidney biopsy should be performed in all patients with SLE who have persistent proteinuria ≥0.5 g/24 hours (or urine protein-to-creatinine ratio ≥500 mg/g), especially when accompanied by active urinary sediment, hematuria, or unexplained decline in kidney function, unless strongly contraindicated. 1
Primary Indications for Kidney Biopsy
The threshold for biopsy should be deliberately low because clinical and laboratory parameters cannot accurately predict histological findings. 1, 2 The most recent KDIGO 2024 guidelines emphasize that proteinuria severity varies considerably even in severe active nephritis and can appear relatively "insignificant" at times. 1
Absolute Indications
- Proteinuria ≥1.0 g/24 hours alone warrants biopsy regardless of other findings 1, 2
- Proteinuria ≥0.5 g/24 hours (or UPCR ≥500 mg/g) PLUS any of the following:
Additional Clinical Scenarios
- Isolated persistent hematuria (>5 RBC/hpf) after excluding infection and other causes 1, 2
- Unexplained renal insufficiency with normal urinary findings (rare presentation) 1
- Dipstick proteinuria ≥2+ on repeated testing should prompt quantification and consideration of biopsy 1
Special Considerations for Low GFR
Even when GFR is <30 ml/min, biopsy should still be considered if: 1, 2
- Kidney size remains normal (>9 cm length in adults) 1
- Evidence of active disease persists (proteinuria, active sediment) 1
- The decline in GFR is unexplained by other causes 1
Lower GFR is associated with more chronic histological lesions, but active disease may still be present and treatable. 1
Timing of Biopsy
Biopsy should be performed within the first month after disease onset, preferably before initiating immunosuppressive treatment. 1, 2 However, treatment with high-dose glucocorticoids should not be delayed if biopsy cannot be readily performed. 1
The EULAR/ERA-EDTA and KDIGO guidelines emphasize that biopsy remains indispensable—its diagnostic and prognostic value cannot be substituted by clinical or laboratory variables. 1
Critical Importance of Biopsy
Kidney biopsy is essential because it: 1, 2
- Classifies disease according to ISN/RPS criteria (Classes I-VI), which directly determines treatment strategy 1
- Distinguishes active from chronic lesions, guiding whether aggressive immunosuppression is appropriate 1
- Identifies alternative diagnoses such as thrombotic microangiopathy (associated with antiphospholipid syndrome), drug-induced tubular necrosis, or non-lupus glomerular diseases 1, 2
- Assesses activity and chronicity indices that inform prognosis and treatment intensity 1
Technical Requirements for Adequate Biopsy
An adequate biopsy sample requires: 1, 2
- Minimum of 10 glomeruli for light microscopy evaluation (some guidelines accept ≥8) 1, 2
- Light microscopy with H&E, PAS, Masson's trichrome, and silver stains 1, 2
- Immunofluorescence for IgG, C3, IgA, IgM, C1q, κ and λ light chains 1, 2
- Electron microscopy when available to assess podocyte injury and immune deposit location 1, 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not rely solely on proteinuria thresholds. While 0.5 g/24 hours is the standard threshold, significant lupus nephritis can present with lower levels of proteinuria, particularly in early disease. 1, 3 One study found Class III lupus nephritis in a patient with <500 mg/24h proteinuria without hematuria. 3
Do not assume normal serology excludes significant kidney disease. Clinical, serological, and laboratory tests cannot accurately predict histological findings. 1, 2 Up to 77% of patients with proteinuria <1000 mg/24h had biopsy-proven lupus nephritis requiring treatment modification. 3
Do not delay biopsy for advanced kidney disease. Even with GFR <30 ml/min, if kidneys are normal size and active disease is present, biopsy can identify reversible lesions. 1, 2
Treatment Implications Based on Biopsy Classification
The histological class fundamentally determines treatment: 1, 2
- Class I and II: Generally no immunosuppression required 1, 2
- Class III and IV (±V): Aggressive therapy with glucocorticoids plus immunosuppressive agents (MMF or cyclophosphamide) 1
- Pure Class V: Immunosuppression reserved for nephrotic-range proteinuria or UPCR >1000 mg/g despite RAAS blockade 1
- Class VI: Preparation for renal replacement therapy rather than immunosuppression 1, 2
This classification-based approach explains why biopsy cannot be substituted by clinical assessment—the difference between Class II (observation) and Class IV (aggressive immunosuppression) cannot be reliably determined without histology. 1, 2