What is the proper procedure for interpreting a radiograph (x-ray)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 22, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

How to Read an X-ray: A Systematic Approach

Use a structured, systematic method to interpret radiographs by evaluating technical quality first, then systematically reviewing all anatomic regions using a consistent search pattern, correlating findings with clinical context, and always comparing to prior studies when available.

Pre-Interpretation: Technical Quality Assessment

Before interpreting any radiograph, verify adequate technical parameters to ensure diagnostic quality:

  • Confirm proper patient positioning and detector placement - The image detector should be positioned as close to the patient as possible to minimize magnification and optimize image quality 1
  • Assess penetration adequacy - Proper x-ray tube voltage (typically 30-100 kV for biological samples) ensures adequate tissue penetration, with penetration values between 10-90% yielding good scan quality 1
  • Evaluate for motion artifact - Movement during exposure degrades image sharpness and diagnostic utility 2
  • Check field of view and collimation - The exposed field should be confined to structures of interest, minimizing unnecessary radiation exposure 1

Systematic Interpretation Framework

Step 1: Identify the Examination Type and Clinical Context

  • Determine the anatomic region and projection - Different anatomic areas require different interpretation approaches based on expected pathology and normal anatomic backgrounds 2
  • Review the clinical indication - Target findings vary based on the clinical question being addressed 2

Step 2: Use a Consistent Search Pattern

Employ a systematic approach to avoid missing findings:

  • Scan the entire image periphery first - Many significant findings are missed at image edges
  • Evaluate bone structures systematically - Assess cortical margins, trabecular patterns, and alignment
  • Review soft tissues methodically - Examine for asymmetry, masses, or abnormal densities
  • Assess air-containing structures - Look for abnormal air collections or absence of expected air
  • Evaluate visible organs and vessels - Check size, position, and contour of cardiac silhouette, great vessels, and other visible organs

Step 3: Analyze Image Characteristics

Understanding physical parameters aids interpretation:

  • Contrast evaluation - Differences in tissue attenuation create diagnostic information, with photoelectric absorption and Compton scattering being the predominant mechanisms in diagnostic energy ranges 3
  • Assess sharpness and resolution - Spatial resolution affects detection of small lesions, with typical pixel sizes of 1.5-2 mm for standard radiographs 1
  • Recognize noise patterns - Quantum mottle and other noise sources can obscure findings 4, 2

Step 4: Correlate with Prior Imaging

  • Compare to previous radiographs - Serial examinations facilitate detection of interval changes 1
  • Use consistent windowing techniques - Maintain similar window width between studies while adjusting window level to reference tissues 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Technical Errors That Compromise Interpretation

  • Inadequate penetration - If penetration is less than 10%, increase voltage or current; if above 90%, decrease these parameters 1
  • Excessive magnification - Use the least degree of magnification required for accurate interpretation, as magnification substantially increases radiation dose 1
  • Poor collimation - Wide-open collimation delivers unnecessary radiation and degrades image quality through increased scatter 1

Interpretive Errors

  • Satisfaction of search - Continuing systematic review after identifying one abnormality prevents missing additional findings
  • Ignoring clinical context - Target findings and their significance vary based on clinical presentation 2
  • Overlooking subtle findings - Lesions smaller than 5 mm may be difficult to detect due to spatial resolution limitations 1
  • Failing to recognize artifacts - Motion, beam hardening, and other artifacts can mimic or obscure pathology 1

Anatomic Region-Specific Considerations

Chest Radiographs

  • Evaluate lung parenchyma systematically - Compare symmetry, assess for nodules, infiltrates, or masses
  • Assess mediastinal contours - Evaluate cardiac silhouette size and great vessel margins
  • Review pleural spaces - Look for effusions, pneumothorax, or pleural thickening
  • Examine bony thorax - Assess ribs, clavicles, and visible spine for fractures or lesions

Musculoskeletal Radiographs

  • Evaluate cortical integrity - Look for breaks, periosteal reaction, or erosions
  • Assess joint spaces - Measure joint space width and alignment
  • Review soft tissues - Look for swelling, calcifications, or foreign bodies
  • Check bone density - Assess for osteopenia or focal lucencies

Quality Assurance Principles

  • Verify equipment calibration - X-ray systems should be well-maintained and periodically surveyed to ensure operation within appropriate specifications 1
  • Use dose-tracking awareness - Be cognizant of radiation exposure parameters, though individual patient dose tracking adds limited practical clinical value 5
  • Employ radiation protection principles - Minimize beam-on time, use optimal collimation, and select appropriate imaging parameters 1

Documentation and Reporting

  • Record systematic findings - Document normal and abnormal findings in each anatomic region reviewed
  • Provide clinical correlation - Relate radiographic findings to clinical presentation
  • Recommend appropriate follow-up - Suggest additional imaging or clinical correlation when indicated
  • Compare to established quality criteria - Scoring of quality criteria relating to features observed in normal clinical radiographs provides a simple method for quality assessment 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Image quality and the clinical radiographic examination.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 1997

Research

The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. X-ray interactions.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 1998

Research

Measurement of image quality in diagnostic radiology.

Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine, 1999

Guideline

Minimizing Radiation Dose to Patients and Personnel During Medical Procedures

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.