Can exposure to chemical agents, such as mustard gas, nerve agents, and riot control agents, in adults with a history of military service increase the risk of developing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 22, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Chemical Agents and GERD Risk in Military Personnel

Direct Answer

Based on available evidence, there is no established causal link between military chemical agent exposure and the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), though gastrointestinal symptoms including nausea have been documented as part of broader Gulf War Illness presentations. 1

Evidence Analysis

Chemical Agents Tested and Their Known Effects

Military chemical warfare agent testing from World War I through 1975 involved several pharmaceutical classes, but none have been definitively linked to GERD as a long-term health outcome 2:

  • Anticholinesterase agents (nerve agents like sarin, cyclosarin, and organophosphates) primarily cause acute cholinergic crisis with symptoms including dim vision, respiratory distress, and cardiac effects 3
  • Vesicants (mustard gas) cause primarily contact injuries and respiratory irritation, with recent evidence showing they inhibit microsomal electron transport chains 3, 4
  • Riot control agents and irritants cause transient mucous membrane irritation and respiratory symptoms 3
  • Anticholinergic agents (atropine-like compounds) were used as antidotes 2

Gulf War Illness Context

The most comprehensive data on military chemical exposures comes from Gulf War veterans, where gastrointestinal symptoms were reported but not specifically characterized as GERD 1:

  • Common complaints included fatigue, myalgia, cognitive difficulties, dyspnea, insomnia, gastrointestinal symptoms, and chemical sensitivity 1
  • Exposures to pyridostigmine bromide, pesticides, sarin, and mustard gas were most associated with Gulf War Illness 1
  • Transient nausea was documented with aluminum phosphide exposure 3

GERD Incidence in Military Populations

Among active duty service members (2005-2014), GERD incidence was 101.3 per 10,000 person-years, with 79.2% being uncomplicated cases 5:

  • Higher rates occurred in females, older age groups, Coast Guard and Air Force personnel, officers, and healthcare occupations 5
  • No specific association with chemical agent exposure was identified in this surveillance data 5

Clinical Implications

What This Means for Practice

When evaluating military veterans with GERD symptoms:

  • Do not assume chemical exposure caused their GERD - the baseline incidence in military populations is substantial without exposure 5
  • Focus on standard GERD risk factors: age, obesity, medications (bronchodilators, calcium channel blockers, anticholinergics), smoking, and alcohol 3
  • Consider Gulf War Illness as a broader syndrome if multiple unexplained symptoms are present beyond isolated GERD 1

Important Caveats

The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence - the available literature focuses on acute toxicity and immediate health effects of chemical agents 3, with limited long-term gastrointestinal outcome data 2. The oxidant stress and complex exposure interactions from military deployments remain incompletely understood 1, 4.

Acute chemical exposures documented in healthcare workers showed primarily respiratory and neurological symptoms, not gastrointestinal manifestations 3. Even significant organophosphate exposures requiring antidotal therapy did not prominently feature GERD-type symptoms 3.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.