What is the likelihood of a patient with Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) co-occurring with a bone marrow malignancy like Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 22, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Co-occurrence of ITP and MDS: Clinical Reality and Diagnostic Challenges

ITP and MDS can co-occur, and this represents a critical diagnostic pitfall—MDS with isolated thrombocytopenia (MDS-IT) is frequently misdiagnosed as refractory ITP, with studies showing that a significant proportion of presumed ITP cases are actually MDS. 1

Frequency and Clinical Context

The exact prevalence of true co-occurrence is not well-established in the literature, but the diagnostic confusion between these entities is well-documented:

  • MDS presenting as isolated thrombocytopenia occurs in a meaningful minority of cases, and these patients are commonly misdiagnosed as having ITP 1
  • Cytogenetic abnormalities are found in approximately 3% of patients initially diagnosed with ITP, suggesting underlying MDS or clonal hematopoietic disorders 2
  • Autoimmune phenomena, including secondary ITP, are well-described in myelodysplastic disorders, particularly in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) 3

Key Distinguishing Features of MDS-IT

When MDS presents with isolated thrombocytopenia mimicking ITP, it typically has specific characteristics:

  • MDS-IT patients often present with multilineage dysplasia, normal karyotype, and low-risk prognostic scores based on IPSS-R 1
  • Minimal morphological dysplasia is common, making diagnosis particularly challenging—MDS with isolated del(20q) frequently presents with thrombocytopenia and minimal dysplasia that may be indistinguishable from ITP on morphology alone 4
  • Increased megakaryocytes in bone marrow without obvious dysplasia can be seen in both conditions 2

Critical Red Flags for MDS Rather Than ITP

Refractory ITP should always trigger reconsideration of the diagnosis:

  • Lack of response to standard ITP therapies (glucocorticoids, TPO-receptor agonists, rituximab) strongly questions the ITP diagnosis and necessitates thorough re-evaluation 1
  • Development of additional cytopenias, monocytosis, or hepatosplenomegaly during follow-up suggests evolution to MDS/CMML 3
  • Accidental discovery of thrombocytopenia without bleeding symptoms is more typical of MDS-IT than ITP 2

Mandatory Diagnostic Approach

For any adult patient with isolated thrombocytopenia, especially if refractory to treatment, the following must be performed:

  • Conventional cytogenetic analysis is mandatory—specific clonal chromosomal abnormalities (such as del(20q), der(1;7), or other MDS-associated changes) can establish MDS diagnosis even with minimal morphological dysplasia 2, 4
  • Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy with differential count of 500 cells to evaluate for dysplasia and enumerate blasts 5
  • Peripheral blood smear evaluation for dysplastic changes, hypersegmented neutrophils, or morphologic abnormalities 6
  • Somatic mutation analysis (TET2, SF3B1, ASXL1, TP53, RUNX1) may demonstrate clonal disease when morphology is equivocal 5

Common Diagnostic Pitfalls

The most critical error is diagnosing ITP based solely on clinical presentation and platelet count:

  • Flow cytometry alone should never be used to diagnose or exclude MDS—phenotypic abnormalities suggest MDS but are not diagnostic without conclusive morphological or cytogenetic features 5
  • Assuming ITP in the absence of obvious dysplasia is dangerous—MDS with del(20q) and other subtypes can have minimal dysplasia indistinguishable from ITP 4
  • Failing to perform cytogenetic analysis in adult thrombocytopenia leads to missed MDS diagnoses that require different treatment approaches 2, 4

Clinical Implications for Management

When cytogenetic abnormalities are found in presumed ITP:

  • Diagnosis should be revised to presumptive MDS or idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS) according to WHO 2008 classification 2
  • Close follow-up is essential as these patients may have indolent disease but require monitoring for progression 2, 4
  • Treatment approach differs fundamentally—ITP treatments (steroids, TPO-agonists, rituximab) versus MDS treatments (hypomethylating agents, lenalidomide, supportive care) 1

Rare but Documented: Other Hematologic Malignancies with ITP

Multiple myeloma can also co-occur with ITP, though this is rare:

  • IgG lambda types show marked predominance when MM and ITP appear simultaneously 7
  • This represents true co-occurrence rather than misdiagnosis, as both conditions respond to appropriate combined therapy 7

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.