What is the recommended treatment approach for a patient diagnosed with hepatitis D?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 22, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Hepatitis D: Comprehensive Lecture

Overview and Clinical Significance

Hepatitis D virus (HDV) represents the most severe form of viral hepatitis, requiring the presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) for infection and replication. 1 HDV coinfection leads to more rapid progression to cirrhosis, increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, and higher mortality compared to HBV monoinfection. 2

  • The primary treatment endpoint is suppression of HDV replication, typically accompanied by normalization of ALT levels and reduced necroinflammatory activity on liver biopsy. 1
  • Approximately 10% of patients may have mild chronic hepatitis D with an uneventful course during short-term follow-up, though advanced liver disease can develop subtly with long-lasting mild necro-inflammation. 1

Current Treatment Landscape

Pegylated Interferon-Alpha: The Standard of Care

All patients with chronic hepatitis D and compensated liver disease, regardless of cirrhosis status, should be considered for treatment with pegylated interferon-alpha (PegIFNα) for 48 weeks. 1 This recommendation is based on guideline evidence showing that high-dose interferon therapy (9 MU three times weekly for 1 year) provides long-term beneficial effects. 1

Efficacy Data

  • Standard-dose IFN-α (3-5 MU/m² three times weekly for 12 months) showed no difference in sustained virologic response compared to placebo in a 61-patient trial, with only 1 patient achieving sustained biochemical response. 1
  • High-dose IFN-α (9 MU three times weekly) demonstrated significantly higher rates of virologic, biochemical, and histologic response. 1
  • Although most patients experience virologic relapse, improvement in liver histology was maintained 10 years post-treatment in patients who received high-dose IFN-α. 1
  • Approximately one-quarter to one-third of patients benefit from interferon treatment with persistent suppression of HDV replication. 3
  • Meta-analysis of five trials showed that interferon alpha led to failure of sustained virological response in 82.6% of treated patients versus 94.8% of controls (RR 0.89,95% CI 0.80 to 0.98, P = 0.02). 4

Treatment Duration Considerations

  • Pegylated interferon-alpha for 48 weeks should be the preferred treatment schedule. 1
  • Personalized treatment durations may be considered based on HDV RNA and HBsAg kinetics and treatment tolerability. 1
  • Prolongation of pegylated IFN treatment to 2 years does not appear to increase virologic response rates, but liver histology improved in most patients treated for 96 weeks. 1
  • Some patients may benefit from prolonged or repeated treatments, with higher rates of HDV RNA undetectability associated with higher rates of HBsAg loss in long-term follow-up. 1

Long-Term Outcomes

  • Patients with undetectable HDV RNA at 6 months after treatment completion, or at any time during post-treatment follow-up, had better outcomes with fewer liver-related events than non-responders. 1
  • Successful interferon treatment is associated with improved clinical long-term outcomes. 3

Contraindications and Special Populations

Pegylated interferon-alpha is absolutely contraindicated in patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to risk of liver failure. 5, 6 These patients should be referred to specialized transplant centers. 1

  • Because of the rarity of hepatitis D, patients should be referred to specialized centers for treatment. 1
  • Cirrhosis status did not show impact on response in the HIDIT-1 and HIDIT-2 trials, though one retrospective study suggested higher platelet counts (indicating less advanced disease) predicted better off-treatment viral response. 1

Ineffective Therapies

Nucleoside Analogues

Lamivudine has been evaluated in small numbers of patients and found to be completely ineffective in inhibiting HDV replication. 1 This is because nucleoside analogues target HBV polymerase, which HDV does not possess. 7

  • Combination therapy with lamivudine or ribavirin has not shown significant advantages over monotherapy with either standard or pegylated interferon. 7
  • The combination of pegylated interferon-alpha with HBV-specific nucleos(t)ide analogues does not appear to improve virologic response. 1

Adverse Events and Monitoring

Common Side Effects

Adverse events related to interferon-alpha are common and sometimes severe, requiring continuous monitoring. 1

  • Flu-like symptoms, asthenia, weight loss, alopecia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia were reported in all trials. 4
  • One patient in a treatment group died by suicide toward the end of the study period. 4
  • Treatment should be continued as long as possible until loss of hepatitis B surface antigen, adjusting the dose to patient tolerance. 7

Emerging Therapies

Bulevirtide

In 2023, bulevirtide was approved in the European Union and Russia for treating chronic hepatitis D. 8 This drug works by binding to and inhibiting the sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP) receptor on liver cells, which is the primary entry point for the virus. 8

Other Investigational Agents

  • Viral entry inhibitors: HH003 and tobevibart 8
  • Nucleic acid polymers: REP 2139-Mg 8
  • Prenylation inhibitors: lonafarnib 8
  • RNA interference-based therapies: elebsiran 8

Combination Therapy Trials

  • The SOLSTICE Phase 2 clinical trial is evaluating tobevibart alone or combined with elebsiran, with monthly combination dosing achieving >50% virologic and biochemical response at 24 weeks of therapy. 8
  • Efficacy and safety will be further evaluated in ECLIPSE 1,2, and 3 trials. 8

Management of HBV Coinfection

Treatment Principles

The ultimate goal of treatment is eradication of both HDV and HBV. 7 Treatment is associated with decline of both HBV and HDV markers, suggesting that combined action on both viral infections is essential to achieve full control of HDV infection. 1

HBV-Specific Considerations

  • For patients with HBV/HDV coinfection requiring HBV suppression, entecavir or tenofovir should be used as first-line therapy due to high potency and high barrier to resistance. 5, 6
  • All HBsAg-positive patients with cirrhosis require ultrasound every 6 months for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance. 6
  • Continue lifelong HCC screening even after HBsAg loss if significant fibrosis or cirrhosis was present at baseline. 6

Clinical Pitfalls and Practical Considerations

Key Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume that standard-dose interferon will be effective; high-dose regimens are necessary for optimal outcomes. 1
  • Do not use lamivudine or other nucleoside analogues as monotherapy for HDV, as they are completely ineffective against HDV replication. 1
  • Do not treat patients with decompensated cirrhosis with pegylated interferon-alpha; refer immediately to transplant centers. 5, 6
  • Do not discontinue treatment prematurely in patients showing slow virologic response, as some patients demonstrate more pronounced viral load decline after the first 24 weeks of treatment. 1

Monitoring Strategy

  • Monitor HDV RNA levels, ALT levels, and clinical status regularly during treatment. 1
  • Assess for adverse events continuously, adjusting dose as needed for patient tolerance. 7
  • Evaluate liver histology or use non-invasive fibrosis assessment to guide treatment decisions and monitor response. 1

Future Directions

With new treatments including bulevirtide and combination therapies on the horizon, the prospects for improved HDV patient outcomes are promising. 8 However, pegylated interferon-alpha will likely continue to have an important role in hepatitis D management, either alone or in combination with novel agents. 3

  • Better biomarkers are needed to select patients with high likelihood to benefit from interferon-based treatments. 3
  • More randomized trials with large sample sizes and less risk of bias are needed before definitive treatment recommendations can be established. 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Interferon-based treatment of chronic hepatitis D.

Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2023

Research

Interferon alpha for chronic hepatitis D.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011

Guideline

Management of Chronic Hepatitis B

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Hepatitis B Management Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Treatment of chronic hepatitis D.

Journal of viral hepatitis, 2007

Research

Hope on the horizon: Emerging therapies for hepatitis D.

World journal of hepatology, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.