Hemiplegia vs Hemiparesis: Clinical Distinction
Hemiplegia represents complete paralysis with total loss of voluntary movement on one side of the body, while hemiparesis indicates partial weakness with preserved but diminished motor function on one side. 1
Defining the Motor Power Distinction
The fundamental difference lies in the degree of motor function loss:
- Hemiplegia involves complete absence of voluntary movement with no antigravity effort or movement at all, corresponding to NIHSS motor scores of 3-4 1
- Hemiparesis demonstrates partial weakness with some preserved voluntary movement and variable functional capacity 1, 2
The terminology reflects a spectrum rather than discrete categories—hemiplegia sits at the severe end where motor control is completely abolished, while hemiparesis encompasses mild to moderate weakness where patients retain some degree of voluntary movement 2.
Clinical Presentation Patterns
Hemiplegia Characteristics
- Presents with flaccidity in acute stages, potentially progressing to spasticity over time 1
- Results in severe functional limitations requiring maximal assistance for all activities of daily living 1
- Affects face, arm, and leg on one side of the body in the classic presentation 3
- Demonstrates markedly elevated oxygen cost of walking with mechanical efficiency reduced up to 50% compared to able-bodied individuals 1
Hemiparesis Characteristics
- Demonstrates potential for functional ambulation, though energy expenditure may be elevated up to 2 times that of able-bodied persons 1
- Patients have variable independence in activities of daily living depending on severity 1
- Comprises both negative signs (weakness, loss of dexterity) and positive signs (spasticity, abnormal muscle synergies) 2
- Weakness can be asymmetrical or predominantly proximal or distal, and may start in legs, arms, or simultaneously in all limbs 4
Anatomical Localization
Both conditions typically result from lesions in the contralateral cerebral hemisphere:
- Cortex, cerebral white matter (corona radiata), and internal capsule lesions manifest as weakness or paralysis of the face, arm, and leg on the opposite side 3
- Vascular diseases of cerebrum and brainstem exceed all other causes in frequency, followed by trauma, brain tumor, encephalitis or abscess, and demyelinating diseases 3
Functional and Prognostic Implications
The distinction has critical implications for rehabilitation planning and outcome expectations:
- Between 25% and 50% of stroke survivors require at least some assistance with activities of daily living, with half experiencing severe long-term effects such as hemiparesis or complete hemiplegia 1
- Patients with hemiparesis show dissociation between abnormal synergies and impaired reaching dexterity, suggesting different underlying mechanisms that may require distinct rehabilitation approaches 2
- Recovery patterns differ: subacute stroke patients (<3 months) show markedly worse reaching kinematics compared to chronic patients (>6 months) even with similar clinical scale scores 2
Critical Clinical Pitfalls
Avoid these common errors when evaluating one-sided weakness:
- Do not assume all one-sided weakness is stroke-related—in children, central nervous system infections (45.5%) are the most common cause, followed by vascular events (21.8%) 5
- Do not rely solely on clinical scales like Fugl-Meyer to capture all components of motor impairment, as these may reflect abnormal synergies and weakness but not loss of dexterity 2
- Recognize atypical presentations, particularly in young children who may present with nonspecific features such as poorly localized pain, refusal to bear weight, irritability, or unsteady gait 4
- Consider that normal or exaggerated reflexes may be observed in patients with pure motor variants and AMAN subtype on electrophysiological examination, contrary to the typical areflexia 4