What is the Ostrosky-Zeichner score used for in patients at risk of invasive candidiasis, particularly those with central venous catheter, recent broad-spectrum antibiotic use, or total parenteral nutrition in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 22, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ostrosky-Zeichner Score for Invasive Candidiasis Risk Assessment

What the Score Is

The Ostrosky-Zeichner score is a clinical prediction rule that identifies ICU patients at high risk for invasive candidiasis by requiring the presence of systemic antibiotics OR central venous catheter (days 1-3) PLUS at least TWO additional risk factors from the following: total parenteral nutrition, dialysis, major surgery, pancreatitis, steroids, or other immunosuppressants. 1

Score Components and Calculation

The Ostrosky-Zeichner rule requires:

  • Systemic antibiotic use (days 1-3) OR central venous catheter presence (days 1-3) 1

AND at least TWO of the following:

  • Total parenteral nutrition (days 1-3) 1
  • Any dialysis (days 1-3) 1
  • Major surgery (days -7 to 0) 1
  • Pancreatitis (days -7 to 0) 1
  • Steroid use (days -7 to 3) 1
  • Other immunosuppressive agents (days -7 to 0) 1

Performance Characteristics

  • The rule identifies patients with a 9.9% rate of invasive candidiasis, capturing 34% of cases 1
  • Sensitivity: 34%, Specificity: 90%, Negative predictive value: 97%, Positive predictive value: 1% 1
  • The rule has high specificity but low sensitivity, meaning it misses many patients who will develop invasive candidiasis 2
  • The relative risk for invasive candidiasis is 4.36 in patients meeting the rule 1

Critical Distinction from Candida Score

The Ostrosky-Zeichner score is different from the "Candida Score" developed by the Spanish group, which uses a point-based system (surgery=1, multifocal colonization=1, TPN=1, severe sepsis=2, with cutoff ≥2.5). 2, 3 The Candida Score has sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 74% 2, 3, while the Ostrosky-Zeichner rule has lower sensitivity (34%) but higher specificity (90%) 1.

Clinical Application According to Guidelines

The IDSA guidelines state that empirical antifungal therapy should be considered in critically ill patients with risk factors for invasive candidiasis and no other known cause of fever, but should NOT rely solely on prediction rules like the Ostrosky-Zeichner score. 2, 4

When to Start Empirical Therapy:

  • Immediately in patients with septic shock and risk factors, regardless of prediction rule scores 2, 4
  • Preferred agent: Echinocandin (caspofungin 70mg load then 50mg daily, micafungin 100mg daily, or anidulafungin 200mg load then 100mg daily) 2
  • Fluconazole 800mg load then 400mg daily is acceptable only for hemodynamically stable patients without recent azole exposure 2, 4

Major Limitations and Pitfalls

The Ostrosky-Zeichner rule applies to less than 10% of ICU patients and was designed primarily for clinical trial enrollment, not routine clinical decision-making. 5 A modified version requiring mechanical ventilation AND central venous catheter AND broad-spectrum antibiotics AND one additional risk factor applies to 18% of patients while maintaining 10% incidence of invasive candidiasis 5.

Critical Errors to Avoid:

  • Delaying antifungal therapy in septic shock while waiting for prediction rule calculation—mortality approaches 100% when therapy is delayed beyond 24 hours 2, 4
  • Relying solely on the rule to exclude invasive candidiasis, as it misses 66% of cases 1
  • Using the rule as the sole criterion for initiating therapy rather than combining it with clinical assessment, biomarkers (β-D-glucan), and culture data from nonsterile sites 2, 4

Integration with Other Diagnostic Approaches

The rule should ideally be combined with β-D-glucan testing (sensitivity 80-90% for candidemia) or mannan/anti-mannan antibody assays to improve diagnostic accuracy. 2, 3 Blood cultures remain the gold standard but are negative in up to 50% of invasive candidiasis cases 2, 6.

References

Research

Multicenter retrospective development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for nosocomial invasive candidiasis in the intensive care setting.

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2007

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Candida Score for Invasive Candidiasis Risk Assessment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Empirical Antifungal Therapy in Critically Ill Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Invasive Candidiasis in Immunocompromised Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.