Evolution of "Other Specified Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders" Across DSM and ICD Versions
The diagnostic category "Other Specified Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders" represents a fundamental shift from earlier DSM versions, emerging as a formal category in DSM-5 to replace the DSM-IV "Psychotic Disorder Not Otherwise Specified" (NOS), while ICD-11 introduced dimensional symptom specifiers across six domains rated on a 4-point scale to enhance diagnostic precision beyond categorical labels. 1
Major Structural Changes Across Versions
DSM-III and DSM-IV Era
- DSM-III and DSM-IV utilized "Psychotic Disorder Not Otherwise Specified" (NOS) as a residual category for psychotic presentations that did not meet full criteria for specific disorders, with minimal guidance on subtyping or specification 1
- These earlier versions maintained purely categorical classification without dimensional assessment, limiting clinical utility for treatment planning 2
DSM-5 Revolution (2013)
- DSM-5 eliminated the NOS category and introduced "Other Specified Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorder," requiring clinicians to specify the reason the presentation does not meet criteria for a specific disorder 3
- The American Psychiatric Association shifted from purely categorical classification to a hybrid model incorporating dimensional symptom assessment, fundamentally changing diagnostic conceptualization 1
- DSM-5 eliminated traditional schizophrenia subtypes (paranoid, disorganized, catatonic, undifferentiated, residual) and replaced them with dimensional severity specifiers across multiple symptom domains 3, 4
- Schneiderian first-rank symptoms lost their special diagnostic status, no longer receiving preferential weight in diagnosis 3, 5
DSM-5-TR Continuity
- DSM-5-TR maintained the "Other Specified" framework introduced in DSM-5 without major structural changes to this category 1
ICD System Evolution
ICD-10 Approach
- ICD-10 utilized categories like "Other nonorganic psychotic disorders" and "Unspecified nonorganic psychosis" as residual categories, similar to DSM-IV's NOS approach 6
- ICD-10 maintained acute and transient psychotic disorders as distinct categories, providing more granular classification for brief psychotic presentations than DSM-IV 6
ICD-11 Transformation (2017-2022)
- ICD-11 restructured the entire mental disorders chapter, creating "Schizophrenia and Other Primary Psychotic Disorders" as a unified grouping with dimensional symptom specifiers across six domains: positive symptoms, negative symptoms, depressive symptoms, manic symptoms, psychomotor symptoms, and cognitive symptoms 2, 7
- Each symptom domain is rated on a 4-point scale from "not present" to "present and severe," allowing clinicians to create detailed symptom profiles that inform treatment planning beyond simple diagnostic labels 1, 7
- Field studies demonstrated that 82.5% to 83.9% of clinicians rated ICD-11 as quite or extremely easy to use, accurate, clear, and understandable, with higher reliability than ICD-10 for psychotic disorders 1, 2, 7
Harmonization Efforts Between DSM-5 and ICD-11
- The American Psychiatric Association and World Health Organization collaborated to ensure better alignment between DSM-5 and ICD-11, though conceptual differences remain, particularly in ICD-11's greater emphasis on dimensional assessment and global applicability 1, 7, 4
- Both systems moved toward dimensional approaches, but ICD-11 implemented this more comprehensively with its six-domain rating system 2, 6
Clinical Assessment Implications
Diagnostic Approach
- The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry recommends using structured diagnostic interviews (such as SCID-5 or MINI 7.0) rather than unstructured clinical assessment to reduce diagnostic bias and improve reliability when evaluating any psychotic presentation 1, 7
- Clinicians should create detailed life charts documenting the longitudinal course of symptoms, as diagnosis frequently evolves over time 1, 2, 7
- Gathering collateral information from family members and other observers is crucial, as patient insight may be limited during acute psychotic episodes 7
Documentation Requirements
- When using "Other Specified" categories in DSM-5/5-TR, clinicians must document the specific reason the presentation does not meet criteria for a defined disorder (e.g., "persistent auditory hallucinations in the absence of any other features") 3
- ICD-11 requires rating symptom severity across all six domains and documenting episodicity and current status to capture the longitudinal pattern beyond the categorical diagnosis 2
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
- Neither DSM-5-TR nor ICD-11 has biological validation, resulting in biologically heterogeneous groups within the same diagnostic category, which limits the precision of "Other Specified" diagnoses 2
- The advantages of ICD-11's dimensional approach are most pronounced for new diagnostic categories; when excluding new categories, differences in diagnostic accuracy compared to ICD-10 were not significant 2
- Clinicians should plan for longitudinal reassessment, as patients often present during acute psychosis before meeting duration criteria for more specific diagnoses like schizophrenia (6-month requirement) 1, 2
- Complete recovery within 6 months is unusual for schizophrenia, as negative symptoms typically persist; this temporal pattern helps differentiate true brief psychotic episodes from early schizophrenia presentations 2