What is the role of corticosteroids (CS) in the treatment of patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 22, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Role of Corticosteroids in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome

The evidence does not support routine use of systemic corticosteroids in SJS/TEN, and high-quality multidisciplinary supportive care should be the priority. 1

Guideline Recommendations

The British Association of Dermatologists (2016) explicitly states there is no conclusive evidence to demonstrate the benefit of any one intervention over conservative management, and that high-quality, multidisciplinary supportive care is the priority. 1 The guideline development group found the data of insufficient quality or consistency to make specific recommendations either for or against corticosteroids (strength of recommendation D; level of evidence 4). 1

Key Evidence Limitations

  • No randomized controlled trials exist - all available evidence comes from retrospective case series with significant methodological limitations. 1
  • Major ascertainment bias exists in reported cohorts, with variations in timing and nature of intervention, case mix, setting, and quality of supportive care. 1
  • Even among experienced clinicians managing SJS/TEN, there is lack of consensus on corticosteroid use. 1

Mixed Evidence on Efficacy

Potential Benefits (Weak Evidence)

  • Retrospective EuroSCAR data showed lower mortality in German patients only (but not French patients) treated with corticosteroids compared to supportive care alone, highlighting geographic and methodological inconsistencies. 1, 2
  • A meta-analysis including 96 studies and 3,248 patients suggested a survival benefit with glucocorticosteroids, but this was significant in only one of three statistical analyses. 1
  • Small case series reported decreased mortality with high-dose pulse therapy: 12 patients receiving IV dexamethasone 100 mg or 1.5 mg/kg for 3 days had lower mortality than SCORTEN-predicted. 1
  • Eight patients receiving IV methylprednisolone 1000 mg for 3 consecutive days had no deaths despite SCORTEN-predicted mortality of 1.6. 1

Significant Safety Concerns

The primary concern with systemic corticosteroids is increased infection risk, which is particularly dangerous in SJS/TEN patients who already have compromised skin barrier function. 1, 2

  • A retrospective case series reported two deaths in patients treated with prednisolone. 1
  • Corticosteroids may increase the risk of sepsis in this vulnerable population. 1
  • The British Journal of Dermatology emphasizes that corticosteroids should be used with caution due to infection concerns. 1

Conflicting Data on Ocular Disease

There is conflicting data on whether systemic corticosteroids help limit ocular disease. 1, 2 One study showed no benefit of systemic corticosteroid use in acute SJS or TEN, while another showed significant improvement in best-corrected visual acuity and mean ocular involvement score in adults (but not in children) treated with corticosteroids or IVIg. 1

Alternative Treatments with Stronger Evidence

Ciclosporin

  • Shows more promising evidence than corticosteroids: 29 patients with SJS/TEN receiving ciclosporin 3 mg/kg daily for 10 days (then tapered) had no deaths despite SCORTEN-predicted mortality of 2.75/29. 1, 2
  • A meta-analysis reported no deaths and a regression model revealed significant beneficial effect compared with supportive care alone. 1

TNF-α Inhibitors

  • Recent RCT shows promise for anti-TNF agents. 1
  • One series of 10 patients treated with etanercept 50 mg subcutaneous had no deaths despite mean SCORTEN-predicted mortality of approximately 50%. 1

If Corticosteroids Are Used Despite Guidelines

Critical caveat: The following regimens are from case series only and should not be interpreted as endorsement. 2

  • Methylprednisolone 40-80 mg daily (approximately 0.8-1.5 mg/kg/day) with rapid tapering over 7-10 days once disease progression arrests. 2
  • IV dexamethasone 100 mg once daily for 3 days (though evidence is limited to 12 patients). 2
  • Use the shortest possible duration with rapid tapering once disease progression arrests (typically 7-10 days total). 2

Critical Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not use corticosteroids as monotherapy without considering alternatives like ciclosporin or IVIg, given the infection risk and lack of proven benefit. 2
  • Do not delay supportive care while debating immunomodulatory therapy - supportive care is the proven priority. 1, 2
  • If corticosteroids are initiated, monitor closely for infections with daily smears of skin and mucous membranes, as corticosteroids blunt the febrile response. 2
  • The anti-inflammatory effects may not be apparent for 6-12 hours after administration, so do not expect immediate clinical improvement. 3

Special Considerations in Pediatric Populations

In children, individual case reports suggest early systemic glucocorticosteroids may limit disease progression, but there are no large studies documenting this benefit. 1 The same infection risk concerns apply, and the more favorable prognosis in pediatric TEN makes prevention of long-term complications the priority over aggressive immunosuppression. 1, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Corticosteroid Treatment Duration and Efficacy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.