What is the best test to confirm achalasia in an adult patient with symptoms of dysphagia?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 22, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Best Test for Confirming Achalasia

High-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) is the definitive diagnostic test for achalasia, with 98% sensitivity and 96% specificity, and should be performed after endoscopy has excluded structural causes. 1

Diagnostic Algorithm

Step 1: Initial Evaluation - Endoscopy First

  • Perform upper endoscopy with esophageal biopsies before manometry to exclude structural abnormalities (strictures, tumors) and mucosal disorders (eosinophilic esophagitis) that can mimic achalasia 2, 3
  • This sequence is critical because structural lesions are more common than achalasia and must be ruled out first 2

Step 2: Definitive Diagnosis - High-Resolution Manometry

  • HRM is superior to standard manometry in terms of reproducibility, speed of performance, and ease of interpretation 2
  • HRM diagnoses achalasia by demonstrating:
    • Elevated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) >15 mm Hg (Manoscan) or >25 mm Hg (Unisensor), indicating impaired lower esophageal sphincter relaxation 1
    • Absent or abnormal esophageal peristalsis 1
  • HRM provides critical achalasia subtype information (Types I, II, III) that predicts treatment outcomes, with Type II responding best to therapy and Type III having the poorest response 1, 3

Step 3: Complementary Study - Barium Esophagram

  • A biphasic barium esophagram is highly valuable as a complementary study because it can simultaneously detect both structural abnormalities and functional motility disorders 3, 4
  • Barium studies have 80-89% sensitivity and 79-91% specificity for diagnosing achalasia compared to manometry 3, 4
  • Important caveat: Some achalasia patients (33% in one study) show complete LES relaxation on manometry despite characteristic radiographic findings, meaning barium studies may occasionally reveal dysmotility not detected on manometry 5
  • Esophagography alone has limited diagnostic yield, with only 78.3% sensitivity, missing approximately 22% of achalasia cases 6

Why Manometry is Essential

  • Manometry is pathognomonic for achalasia even in early clinical stages when radiographic findings may be equivocal 7
  • Missing achalasia before antireflux surgery is catastrophic, as performing fundoplication on an achalasia patient leads to severe complications 2, 1
  • Manometry must be performed before any antireflux surgery if there is any question of an alternative diagnosis 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely solely on esophagography for diagnosis - approximately 22% of achalasia cases will be missed, particularly early-stage disease 6
  • Do not use manometry as the initial test - always perform endoscopy first to exclude the more common structural causes 2
  • Recognize that complete LES relaxation on manometry does not exclude achalasia - if radiographic findings are typical, proceed with treatment even with normal manometry 5
  • Use manufacturer-specific and catheter-specific normal values, as IRP thresholds differ significantly between systems 1

References

Guideline

Esophageal Manometry Interpretation Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Esophageal Achalasia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Esophagram Indications and Clinical Applications

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

[Manometry in esophageal achalasia].

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti, 2002

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.