Is a patient with a history of herniated disc L5-S1 and back problems, but without diabetes, circulatory issues, or foot deformities, a candidate for medical shoes?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 22, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Medical Shoes Are Not Indicated for This Patient

This patient does not qualify for specialized therapeutic footwear, as medical shoes are specifically indicated for diabetic patients with high-risk foot conditions—not for isolated back problems from lumbar disc herniation. 1

Evidence-Based Criteria for Medical Shoes

The American Diabetes Association clearly defines who qualifies for specialized therapeutic footwear:

  • Specialized therapeutic footwear is recommended exclusively for high-risk patients with diabetes, including those with severe neuropathy, foot deformities, ulcers, callous formation, poor peripheral circulation, or history of amputation 1

  • The routine prescription of therapeutic footwear is not generally recommended even in diabetic patients without high-risk features 1

  • Medical shoes require specific foot pathology: loss of protective sensation (LOPS), structural foot abnormalities, history of foot ulcers, or peripheral arterial disease 1

Why This Patient Does Not Qualify

Your clinical documentation appropriately identifies that this patient lacks all qualifying criteria:

  • No diabetes mellitus - the primary disease state for which medical shoes are indicated 1

  • No circulatory problems - no peripheral arterial disease or vascular insufficiency 1

  • No foot deformities - no structural abnormalities, Charcot foot, hammertoes, or bony prominences 1

  • No neuropathy affecting the feet - no loss of protective sensation, no insensate feet 1

  • No foot ulcers or history of ulceration 1

  • No history of amputation 1

Lumbar Disc Herniation Does Not Justify Medical Shoes

The patient's L5-S1 herniated disc is a spinal pathology, not a foot condition:

  • L5-S1 disc herniation primarily affects the L5 nerve root, causing sensory loss in the big toe and dorsal foot, with weakness in foot dorsiflexion and great toe extension 2

  • Standard treatment for lumbar disc herniation includes conservative measures: NSAIDs, brief activity modification, progressive ambulation, physical therapy, and lumbar extension exercises 3, 4, 5

  • Most symptomatic disc herniations (90-95%) resolve with conservative therapy without requiring specialized footwear 4, 6

  • There is no evidence in diabetes foot care guidelines that back pain or radiculopathy qualifies patients for medical shoes 1

Appropriate Footwear Recommendations

For this patient, standard footwear guidance is sufficient:

  • General footwear recommendations include a broad and square toe box, laces with three or four eyes per side, padded tongue, quality lightweight materials, and sufficient size to accommodate a cushioned insole 1

  • Well-fitted walking shoes or athletic shoes that cushion the feet and redistribute pressure are appropriate for patients without foot deformities 1

  • Over-the-counter supportive footwear is adequate for managing back pain without specific foot pathology 1

Common Pitfall to Avoid

Do not conflate neurological symptoms from spinal pathology with foot-specific indications for medical shoes. While L5-S1 herniation may cause leg and foot symptoms, this represents referred pain and radiculopathy—not the foot deformities, neuropathy, or vascular disease that justify specialized therapeutic footwear 1, 2.

The Centurion criteria appropriately denied this request, as the patient lacks any diabetes-related or foot-specific pathology that would benefit from medical-grade therapeutic footwear 1.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

L5-S1 Disc Lesion Neurological Effects

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Herniated lumbar intervertebral disk.

Annals of internal medicine, 1990

Related Questions

What is the management plan for a herniated disc at L4-L5 (Lumbar 4-Lumbar 5)?
What is the best course of action for a 32-year-old female with severe low back pain, leg buckling, and poor balance, and a history of herniated discs in the cervical and lumbar spine?
Can a herniated disk or bulge without radicular symptoms be considered in a patient with chronic low back pain and no neurological deficits?
What is the next step in management for a female patient with constant, dull back pain (9/10 intensity) radiating to the midback, accompanied by numbness at the site of pain, who has not responded to physical therapy and is concerned about a possible herniated disc?
What is the likely diagnosis and management for a patient with unilateral leg pain that worsens with prolonged sitting and improves with ambulation?
Can a 20-year-old patient develop Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) after receiving the Covid (Coronavirus) vaccine every six months?
What is the CPT (Current Procedural Terminology) code for a standard Pulmonary Function Test (PFT) to assess for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in an adult male smoker?
What medication is recommended for a patient with a sore throat?
Is an electrocardiogram (ECG) necessary before administering the second dose of Paliperidone (Invega) 75mg Intramuscular Injection (IMI) in patients with pre-existing cardiac conditions or risk factors?
What is the best approach for a patient with a 3-week cough who is human rhinovirus (HRV) positive?
Is a liquid swish and spit method effective for a patient with a sore throat and a history of gastrointestinal issues?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.