What is the recommended management for a patient infected with vancomycin-resistant bacteria (VRE)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 23, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Vancomycin-Resistant Bacteria

For vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) infections, linezolid 600 mg IV or PO every 12 hours is the first-line treatment, while daptomycin 8-12 mg/kg IV daily serves as the preferred alternative for bacteremia. 1

Species Identification is Critical

Before initiating therapy, you must distinguish between E. faecium and E. faecalis because treatment options differ significantly:

  • Quinupristin-dalfopristin is NOT active against E. faecalis (MIC₉₀ = 16 mcg/mL), making species identification essential before selecting this agent 1, 2
  • E. faecium accounts for the majority of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections and responds to all approved VRE agents 2
  • E. faecalis VRE is less common but requires linezolid or daptomycin specifically 1

Primary Treatment Algorithm for VRE Faecium

First-Line Therapy

  • Linezolid 600 mg IV or PO every 12 hours for 10-14 days (bacteremia) or 7-14 days (other sites) 1, 3
  • This recommendation has strong guideline support with FDA approval and demonstrated 67% cure rate in documented VRE infections 1, 3
  • Linezolid has the advantage of excellent oral bioavailability, allowing IV-to-PO conversion 3

Alternative for Bacteremia

  • Daptomycin 8-12 mg/kg IV daily for 10-14 days is the preferred alternative specifically for bloodstream infections 1
  • Higher doses (8-12 mg/kg) are recommended rather than the standard 6 mg/kg dose used for other indications 1

Additional Option for E. Faecium Only

  • Quinupristin-dalfopristin 7.5 mg/kg IV every 8 hours demonstrated 70.5% clinical response in bacteriologically evaluable patients and 65.8% overall response 4, 2
  • This agent is bacteriostatic with MIC₉₀ = 2 mcg/mL against E. faecium 2
  • Major limitation: myalgia/arthralgia is the most common treatment-limiting adverse effect 4, 2

Site-Specific Considerations

Intra-Abdominal Infections

For critically ill patients with healthcare-associated intra-abdominal infections at risk for VRE:

  • Linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours as part of combination therapy with appropriate gram-negative coverage 5
  • Tigecycline 100 mg loading dose, then 50 mg IV every 12 hours for 5-7 days is an alternative for intra-abdominal infections specifically 1
  • Critical pitfall: Do NOT use tigecycline for VRE bacteremia due to inadequate serum concentrations despite in vitro activity 1

Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

  • Linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours for 14-28 days demonstrated 83% cure rate in diabetic foot infections 3
  • Treatment duration of 7-14 days is typically sufficient for non-diabetic complicated skin infections 1

Urinary Tract Infections

  • Linezolid achieves adequate urinary concentrations and demonstrated 63% cure rate for VRE urinary infections 3

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Distinguish Colonization from Infection

  • Do not treat VRE colonization - antimicrobial therapy is indicated only for documented invasive infection 1
  • VRE commonly colonizes the gastrointestinal tract without causing disease 1
  • Positive cultures from non-sterile sites require clinical correlation with signs/symptoms of infection 1

Tigecycline Limitations

  • Never use tigecycline monotherapy for bacteremia - serum levels are inadequate despite in vitro susceptibility 1
  • Reserve tigecycline for intra-abdominal infections where tissue penetration is adequate 1

Monitoring for Adverse Effects

  • Linezolid: Monitor for thrombocytopenia, particularly with treatment courses exceeding 14-21 days 2
  • Common adverse effects include gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), headache, and taste alteration 2
  • Quinupristin-dalfopristin: Anticipate arthralgias/myalgias which may limit therapy 4, 2

Emerging Combination Strategies for Refractory Cases

When monotherapy fails in severe VRE infections:

  • Linezolid plus fosfomycin may be considered, though evidence remains limited 1
  • Double beta-lactam combinations (imipenem plus ampicillin, or cephalosporins plus ampicillin) have shown synergistic bactericidal activity against some E. faecalis strains 1
  • Combination therapy with quinupristin-dalfopristin plus ampicillin or doxycycline has shown enhanced killing in vitro, but clinical use remains unestablished 2, 6

Infection Control Measures

Beyond antimicrobial therapy, preventing VRE transmission requires:

  • Immediate implementation of contact precautions for all patients with VRE infection or colonization 5
  • Hand hygiene before and after every patient contact 5
  • Early detection and prompt reporting by the microbiology laboratory 5
  • Education of hospital staff regarding vancomycin resistance 5
  • Prudent vancomycin use to prevent selection pressure for resistance 5

Resistance Surveillance

  • Linezolid resistance (MIC ≥8 mcg/mL) has been reported due to 23S ribosomal RNA mutations, though it remains uncommon 2
  • Quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance emerged in 1.8% of VRE strains during therapy 2
  • Ongoing susceptibility testing is essential to guide therapy adjustments 5

References

Guideline

Treatment of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium infections with quinupristin/dalfopristin.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2001

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.