What studies demonstrate the safety of Cook's (Cook Medical) cervical mechanical dilator balloon with prostaglandins (alprostadil)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The safety of Cook's cervical mechanical dilator balloon with prostaglandins cannot be comprehensively proven with a single list of studies, but the available evidence suggests that mechanical induction methods, such as those using a Foley catheter, have a minimal risk of uterine rupture, as reported in a 2015 study by the American Family Physician 1. The Cook Cervical Ripening Balloon is a device used for cervical ripening in labor induction, often in combination with prostaglandins like misoprostol or dinoprostone.

  • Key points to consider when evaluating the safety of this combination include:
    • The type of prostaglandin used
    • The dosing and timing of administration
    • Patient characteristics, such as prior uterine surgery or cesarean delivery
  • A study from 2015 found an association between misoprostol use in the third trimester and uterine rupture, but noted that the evidence regarding risk with mechanical induction methods is minimal, and no ruptures have been reported when using a Foley catheter for cervical ripening 1.
  • For the most current and comprehensive safety data, it is recommended to consult current medical databases, systematic reviews, or meta-analyses on this topic, or speak with a maternal-fetal medicine specialist who can provide guidance based on the most current evidence and your specific clinical context.
  • The combination of mechanical and pharmacological methods for labor induction may offer synergistic effects, potentially shortening induction-to-delivery time, but the safety profile varies based on the specific approach used.
  • As of the most recent study available, the use of a Foley catheter for cervical ripening has not been associated with uterine rupture, suggesting a potential benefit of mechanical methods in reducing this risk 1.

From the Research

Studies on the Safety of Cooks Cervical Mechanical Dilator Balloon with Prostaglandins

  • The study 2 reviewed the safety and efficacy of administering various prostaglandin formulations for cervical ripening and spontaneous vaginal delivery, but did not specifically focus on the Cooks cervical mechanical dilator balloon.
  • A randomized controlled trial 3 evaluated the combination of oral misoprostol and mechanical dilation with a double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening, finding that this combination improved the efficacy of labor induction in term pregnancies.
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis 4 compared the efficacy and safety of mechanical cervical dilation plus misoprostol with misoprostol alone for cervical ripening, finding that the combination resulted in a shorter time to delivery and a lower incidence of neonatal intensive care unit admission.
  • A prospective case series 5 assessed the safety and effectiveness of mechanical dilatation of the stenosed cervix under local anesthesia, but did not involve the use of prostaglandins or the Cooks cervical mechanical dilator balloon.
  • A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study 6 evaluated the safety and efficacy of oral misoprostol for cervical ripening prior to gynecological transcervical procedures, finding that misoprostol increased baseline cervical diameter and reduced time required for cervical dilatation in pre-menopausal women.

Key Findings

  • The combination of mechanical cervical dilation and misoprostol may be associated with a shorter time to delivery and a lower incidence of neonatal intensive care unit admission compared to misoprostol alone 4.
  • Mechanical dilatation of the stenosed cervix under local anesthesia may be a safe and effective procedure 5.
  • Oral misoprostol may be beneficial for cervical priming in pre-menopausal women prior to gynecological transcervical procedures 6.

Limitations

  • The available studies do not specifically focus on the Cooks cervical mechanical dilator balloon, and more research is needed to fully assess its safety and efficacy.
  • The studies have varying populations, methodologies, and outcomes, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions about the safety of the Cooks cervical mechanical dilator balloon with prostaglandins.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.