What is the next step in managing a male patient with hematuria (presence of blood in urine) and a urinalysis showing 0 red blood cells (RBCs)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 23, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Visible Blood in Urine with 0 RBCs on Urinalysis

This finding represents a false-positive dipstick result that does not meet the diagnostic threshold for true hematuria, and no urologic workup is indicated at this time. 1

Understanding the Diagnostic Threshold

The critical distinction here is that true hematuria requires ≥3 red blood cells per high-power field (RBC/HPF) on microscopic examination, not just a positive dipstick test. 1, 2, 3

  • A urinalysis showing 0 RBCs falls within the normal range (0-2 RBCs/HPF is considered normal). 1
  • The American Urological Association explicitly states that "a dipstick reading suggestive of hematuria should not lead to imaging or further investigation without confirmation of three or greater red blood cells per high power field." 1
  • Dipstick tests have limited specificity (65-99%) and frequently produce false-positive results. 1, 2

What Causes False-Positive Dipstick Results?

The dipstick detects heme pigment, not intact red blood cells, which explains why you can see "blood" on the dipstick but 0 RBCs on microscopy. 4

Common causes of false-positive dipstick results include:

  • Myoglobinuria from rhabdomyolysis (though this is typically associated with elevated creatine phosphokinase). 4
  • Hemoglobinuria from intravascular hemolysis. 4
  • Contamination with menstrual blood in female patients. 1, 2
  • Concentrated urine causing false readings. 1
  • Certain medications or foods that color the urine. 1

Recommended Management Approach

Document this finding as within normal limits and do not proceed with urologic evaluation. 1

  • No cystoscopy is indicated. 1
  • No CT urography is indicated. 1
  • No urology referral is needed. 1
  • Simply document the discrepancy between dipstick and microscopy. 1

Critical Caveats: When to Reconsider

You should obtain a repeat urinalysis with microscopy if any of the following develop:

  • New urologic symptoms such as irritative voiding symptoms (urgency, frequency), flank pain, or dysuria. 1, 2
  • Visible gross hematuria that the patient can actually see. 1, 2
  • Systemic symptoms suggesting rhabdomyolysis (muscle pain, weakness, dark urine with elevated CPK). 4

If a subsequent urinalysis shows ≥3 RBCs/HPF on microscopic examination, then full urologic evaluation would be warranted, particularly in a male patient who may have additional risk factors such as age >40 years, smoking history, or occupational chemical exposure. 1, 2, 3

Common Pitfall to Avoid

Never initiate a full hematuria workup based solely on dipstick positivity without microscopic confirmation. 1, 2 This is a frequent error that leads to unnecessary invasive testing (cystoscopy), radiation exposure (CT urography), and patient anxiety. 5 The American Academy of Family Physicians emphasizes that confirmation with microscopic urinalysis showing ≥3 RBCs/HPF on at least two of three properly collected specimens is required before any workup begins. 1, 2

References

Guideline

Hematuria Evaluation and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Management of Hematuria in the Outpatient Setting

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Evaluation and Management of Asymptomatic Hematuria

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Urinalysis is an inadequate screen for rhabdomyolysis.

The American journal of emergency medicine, 2014

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.