Will Shin Splints Keep Recurring in This Soccer Athlete?
Yes, shin splints have one of the highest recurrence rates of all running-related injuries, with prior bone stress injury increasing recurrence risk sixfold in females and sevenfold in males—but recurrence can be prevented through proper rehabilitation and addressing contributing factors. 1
Understanding the Recurrence Risk
Shin splints (medial tibial stress syndrome) are fundamentally caused by repetitive loading that exceeds the bone's ability to remodel and repair. 1 In soccer athletes specifically, the combination of running with sudden directional changes creates particularly high risk for this condition. 2
The key determinant of whether this keeps happening is whether the underlying contributing factors are identified and corrected. 2 Without addressing these factors, the injury will likely recur once training resumes at previous intensity levels.
Critical Factors That Determine Recurrence
Training Load Management
- Inadequate management of training parameters (distance, duration, frequency, intensity) contributes directly to the high recurrence rate of tibial bone stress injuries 1
- Progression that is too rapid amplifies recurrence risk significantly 1
- The athlete must build back to 50% of pre-injury distance before introducing any speed work or directional changes 2
Biomechanical and Strength Deficits
The following must be addressed to prevent recurrence:
- Calf and hamstring flexibility deficits 1, 2
- Hip and core muscle weakness 2
- Tibialis anterior and calf strength imbalances 2
- Running mechanics (forefoot contact running patterns may contribute to posteromedial shin pain) 3
Sport-Specific Risk Factors
For this soccer athlete specifically:
- Playing on natural grass increases injury risk compared to artificial turf (relative risk 0.53 for artificial turf) 2
- Defender and attacker positions carry higher risk due to opponent contact 2
Prevention of Recurrence: The Rehabilitation Protocol
Complete the following structured progression to minimize recurrence risk:
Phase 1: Initial Recovery (Mandatory)
- Achieve 10-14 consecutive days of pain-free walking before any running 4, 2
- Progress to 30-45 minutes of continuous pain-free walking 4, 2
- Ensure complete resolution of bony tenderness, especially since this is described as "severe pain" 1
- Achieve 75-80% strength symmetry between limbs in functional testing 2
Phase 2: Graduated Return to Running
- Begin with 30-60 second running intervals at 30-50% of pre-injury pace 2
- Perform exercises on alternate days only (bone cells regain 98% mechanosensitivity after 24 hours rest) 4
- Use treadmill or compliant surfaces initially, avoiding hard surfaces 4, 2
- Progress distance before speed, increasing approximately 10% per progression 2
- Monitor pain during and after exercise as the primary guide—if pain occurs, rest until resolved and resume at lower level 4
Phase 3: Sport-Specific Progression
- Build to 50% of pre-injury distance level before introducing speed work 1, 2
- Only introduce directional changes after achieving 50% pre-injury distance 2
- Progress to level surfaces before introducing hills 4
- Vary terrain only once back to normal training 4
Common Pitfalls That Guarantee Recurrence
Avoid these critical errors:
- Returning to running before achieving pain-free walking for 10-14 days 2
- Progressing speed before distance 1, 2
- Failing to address underlying strength and flexibility deficits 2
- Training on consecutive days during early return-to-running phase 4
- Ignoring pain signals during progression 4
Bottom Line on Recurrence
This will not be a recurring problem if the athlete:
- Completes the full structured rehabilitation protocol outlined above
- Addresses all modifiable biomechanical and strength factors
- Progresses training load appropriately (distance before speed)
- Maintains adequate rest between training sessions during return-to-sport
However, this will keep happening if the athlete returns to full soccer activity without completing proper rehabilitation or addressing contributing factors. 1 The high recurrence rate seen in the literature reflects athletes who do not adequately address these issues, not an inherent inevitability of the condition itself.