What is the role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, including checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab (pembrolizumab) or nivolumab (nivolumab), in the treatment of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 24, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy is now the standard of care for patients with resectable stage IB (≥4 cm) to IIIA NSCLC without EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements, based on FDA approval and major society recommendations. 1, 2, 3

Patient Selection Criteria

Offer neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy to patients meeting ALL of the following:

  • Resectable NSCLC with tumors ≥4 cm OR node-positive disease (stage IB-IIIA) 1, 2, 3
  • No known EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements 2, 3
  • Performance status 0-1 2
  • PD-L1 testing is NOT required for patient selection - benefit is seen across all PD-L1 expression levels 2

Treatment Regimen

Standard approach consists of:

  • 2-4 cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy plus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab) 1, 2
  • For adenocarcinoma: carboplatin/pemetrexed plus pembrolizumab is a standard regimen 2
  • Surgery performed 4-6 weeks after completing neoadjuvant therapy 1, 2
  • Single-agent immunotherapy for 1 year as adjuvant treatment after surgery 2, 3

Efficacy Data Supporting This Approach

Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy dramatically outperforms chemotherapy alone:

  • Pathologic complete response (pCR) rates: 28.1% with chemo-immunotherapy versus 6-8% with chemotherapy alone 4, 5
  • Major pathologic response (MPR) rates range from 27-86% depending on regimen, with combination therapy achieving 41.9% versus 15% for chemotherapy alone 6, 7
  • 7.6-fold higher odds of achieving pCR compared to chemotherapy alone (OR 7.63,95% CI 4.49-12.97) 5
  • 49% reduction in disease progression (HR 0.51,95% CI 0.38-0.67) 5
  • 49% reduction in mortality (HR 0.51,95% CI 0.36-0.74) 5

The CheckMate-816 trial specifically demonstrated that neoadjuvant nivolumab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy achieved significantly higher pCR, MPR, and objective response rates compared to chemotherapy alone, leading to FDA approval 2, 3.

Response Assessment

Evaluate treatment response using:

  • PET-CT plus serum tumor markers and/or ctDNA load 2
  • Critical caveat: CT RECIST response has a 41-45% discordant rate with histopathologic response and cannot reliably predict pCR 4
  • Pathologic assessment at surgery using standardized criteria: MPR defined as ≤10% viable tumor 6, 4

Adjuvant Management Strategy

Post-surgical treatment depends on pathologic response:

  • For patients achieving MPR or pCR: 1-year maintenance immunotherapy is recommended 2
  • For stage II-IIIA disease: adjuvant atezolizumab improves disease-free survival regardless of initial PD-L1 status 2
  • The NADIM trial demonstrated that neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy combined with adjuvant nivolumab achieved median DFS of 21.4 months and 3-year OS rate over 80% 1, 2

Safety Profile

Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy is well-tolerated:

  • Grade ≥3 toxicity rate: 18.0% 5
  • No increase in toxicity compared to chemotherapy alone (OR 1.01,95% CI 0.67-1.52) 5
  • Failure to undergo resection: 0-46% depending on regimen, with most modern protocols showing rates <20% 8
  • No major delays in surgery with standard 2-4 cycle regimens 6

Important Clinical Caveats

Watch for these potential pitfalls:

  • Immune-related nodal flares occur in approximately 22% of patients and may mimic progression - require pathologic evaluation before excluding potentially curative surgery 6
  • Patients achieving pathologic response have dramatically improved survival: 75% reduction in progression risk (HR 0.25) and 74% reduction in mortality (HR 0.26) 5
  • PD-L1 expressors (≥1%) are more likely to achieve pCR (OR 2.93), but benefit is seen across all PD-L1 levels, so testing should not delay treatment 2, 5

Monotherapy Immunotherapy: Not Recommended

While neoadjuvant immunotherapy monotherapy has been studied, it achieves substantially lower response rates:

  • Nivolumab monotherapy: 17-45% MPR rate, 7-16% pCR rate 6, 8
  • Atezolizumab monotherapy: 19-21% MPR rate overall (33% in PD-L1 ≥50%) 6, 1

The combination of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy is superior and should be the standard approach given the 7.6-fold improvement in pCR rates and survival benefits demonstrated in randomized trials 5.

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.