Is endovenous ablation therapy (EVAT) indicated for a patient with bilateral highly inserted Small Saphenous Veins (SSV), significant reflux, especially on the left side with segmental reflux and an incompetent perforator, along with superficial venous dilatation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 24, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Endovenous Ablation Therapy is Indicated for the Left Small Saphenous Vein

Yes, EVAT is medically indicated for the left SSV based on the documented segmental reflux (2683 ms) and incompetent perforator, though the bilateral highly inserted SSV anatomy and small vein diameters (0.24 cm right, 0.31 cm left) require careful consideration of treatment approach.

Critical Assessment of Vein Size and Treatment Feasibility

Left SSV Analysis

  • The left SSV diameter of 0.31 cm (3.1 mm) meets the minimum threshold for endovenous thermal ablation, as multiple guidelines establish that veins ≥2.5 mm can be treated with thermal ablation techniques 1, 2.
  • The documented reflux time of 2683 milliseconds (2.68 seconds) substantially exceeds the diagnostic threshold of ≥500 milliseconds, confirming significant venous insufficiency requiring intervention 1, 2.
  • The incompetent perforator measuring 0.5 cm (5 mm) with associated superficial dilated tortuous veins represents a significant source of venous hypertension that warrants treatment 1.

Right SSV Analysis

  • The right SSV diameter of 0.24 cm (2.4 mm) falls below the recommended minimum threshold of 2.5 mm for optimal treatment outcomes 1.
  • Vessels less than 2.5 mm treated with ablation or sclerotherapy demonstrate significantly lower success rates, with only 16% primary patency at 3 months for veins <2.0 mm compared to 76% for veins >2.0 mm 1.
  • Without documented reflux on the right side, treatment is not indicated at this time 1, 2.

Evidence-Based Treatment Algorithm

Step 1: Confirm Diagnostic Criteria (Already Met for Left SSV)

  • Reflux duration ≥500 milliseconds: 2683 ms documented 1, 2
  • Vein diameter ≥2.5 mm: 3.1 mm documented 1, 2
  • Symptomatic presentation with visible varicosities: documented superficial dilated tortuous veins 1

Step 2: Select Appropriate Treatment Modality for Left SSV

  • Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) is the preferred first-line treatment for the left SSV, achieving 98-100% complete occlusion rates at 3 months in multiple studies of SSV ablation 3, 4, 5.
  • Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) represents an equally effective alternative with similar efficacy profiles 2, 6.
  • The treatment should target the segmental reflux at the posterior aspect of the left knee specifically, as this represents the primary source of venous hypertension 2.

Step 3: Address the Incompetent Perforator

  • The 0.5 cm incompetent perforator located 10 cm below the left knee requires concurrent treatment to prevent recurrence and optimize outcomes 1.
  • This can be addressed with either direct ablation or foam sclerotherapy as an adjunctive procedure 1.
  • Treating the main SSV trunk without addressing the incompetent perforator will result in persistent symptoms and higher recurrence rates 1.

Step 4: Manage Superficial Varicosities

  • The superficial dilated tortuous veins at the distal thigh and proximal leg should be treated with ambulatory phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy following or concurrent with SSV ablation 1, 3.
  • A combined approach with thermal ablation for the main trunk and sclerotherapy for tributary veins provides comprehensive treatment 1.

Special Anatomical Considerations: Highly Inserted SSV

Critical Safety Measures

  • The highly inserted SSV anatomy requires meticulous ultrasound guidance to identify the saphenopopliteal junction (SPJ) and avoid popliteal vein involvement 4, 5.
  • Sparing the deep, most cephalad segment of the SSV near the SPJ reduces the risk of complications while maintaining excellent occlusion rates 4.
  • One study demonstrated 100% immediate technical success and 98% long-term occlusion when the SPJ and popliteal fossa were avoided during EVLA 4.

Tumescent Anesthesia Requirements

  • Liberal use of tumescent cold saline around the vein is essential to protect the sural nerve, particularly given the proximity to the incompetent perforator 3, 5.
  • Studies show that paresthesia rates dropped to 0% when larger volumes of tumescent anesthesia were used, compared to 2.25% with standard volumes 3.

Expected Outcomes and Complications

Efficacy Data for SSV Ablation

  • Complete occlusion rates of 98-99% at 3-12 months follow-up across multiple studies 3, 4, 5.
  • Recanalization rates of only 1-2% at 12-24 months 3, 5.
  • Symptom resolution occurs in 99% of patients, with most experiencing relief soon after the procedure 3, 4.

Complication Profile

  • Sural nerve paresthesia occurs in 1.3-4% of cases, with most resolving within 4 weeks when proper tumescent technique is used 3, 4, 7, 5.
  • Superficial thrombophlebitis in 3-4% of cases, typically managed conservatively 3, 4, 5.
  • Deep vein thrombosis risk is 0.3% and pulmonary embolism risk is 0.1% 1, 6.
  • No skin burns or major complications reported in SSV-specific studies 4, 5.

Conservative Management Requirements

  • Document a 3-month trial of medical-grade gradient compression stockings (20-30 mmHg) before proceeding with intervention 1, 6.
  • Include conservative measures such as leg elevation, exercise, and avoidance of prolonged standing 1.
  • However, if the patient has advanced disease with skin changes or ulceration, treatment need not be delayed for compression therapy trials 6.

Why the Right SSV Should Not Be Treated

  • The right SSV diameter of 2.4 mm falls below the evidence-based threshold for optimal outcomes 1.
  • No reflux is documented on the right side, making treatment unnecessary at this time 1, 2.
  • Treating undersized veins results in significantly lower success rates and higher recurrence, with only 16% patency at 3 months for veins <2.0 mm 1.

Procedural Approach Summary

For the left SSV, proceed with endovenous laser ablation using 810-nm or 980-nm diode laser with ultrasound guidance and tumescent anesthesia, delivering approximately 70-100 J/cm of energy 3, 5. Spare the deep segment near the SPJ to minimize complications while maintaining high occlusion rates 4. Concurrently treat the incompetent perforator and plan adjunctive sclerotherapy or phlebectomy for the superficial varicosities 1, 3. The procedure can be performed under local anesthesia with same-day discharge 2, 6.

References

Guideline

Varithena and Foam Sclerotherapy for Venous Insufficiency

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Endovenous Ablation Therapy for Incompetent Short Saphenous Vein

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Endovenous laser treatment of the small saphenous vein.

Journal of vascular surgery, 2009

Research

Endovenous laser ablation of the small saphenous vein: prospective analysis of 150 patients, a cohort study.

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery, 2009

Guideline

Radiofrequency Ablation for Symptomatic Varicose Veins

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Reflux in the below-knee great saphenous vein can be safely treated with endovenous ablation.

Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2014

Related Questions

Is endovenous laser ablation of the left small saphenous vein medically necessary for a patient with intractable ulceration secondary to venous stasis and varicose veins of both lower extremities?
Is ablation of the bilateral great saphenous vein (GSV) medically necessary for a patient with severe and persistent pain, swelling, and varicose veins, despite conservative management with compression stockings and medications, including Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and Furosemide (Lasix)?
Is endovenous ablation therapy medically necessary for a patient with symptomatic varicose veins and a right small saphenous vein (SSV) diameter below 4.5mm?
Is a patent and incompetent great saphenous vein (Endovenous Ablation Therapy - EVAT) with a diameter of 3mm and reflux time of 1.5 seconds indicated for Endovenous Ablation Therapy (EVAT)?
Is endovenous laser ablation of the Great Saphenous Vein (GSV) indicated for incompetent saphenofemoral valve?
What investigations should be done for a patient suspected of having idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH)?
What is the diagnostic workup and treatment for a patient with suspected allergic broncho pulmonary aspergillosis, history of asthma or cystic fibrosis, and possible previous diagnosis of strongyloidiasis?
Is Maalox (aluminum hydroxide) safe for patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) on hemodialysis?
What is the diagnostic and treatment approach for a patient with suspected Churg-Strauss syndrome, history of asthma, and possible previous diagnosis of strongyloidiasis, who is being investigated for allergic broncho pulmonary aspergillosis?
What is the recommended treatment for a patient with segmental reflux in the left Small Saphenous Vein (SSV), an incompetent perforator, and superficial dilated tortuous veins?
What are the considerations and treatment outcomes for a patient with mild to moderate malocclusion and good oral hygiene who is considering Invisalign (clear aligners)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.