What ultrasound findings are characteristic of a BI-RADS (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System) 4B lesion in an adult female patient?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 25, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

BI-RADS 4B Ultrasound Findings

A breast lesion is classified as BI-RADS 4B on ultrasound when it demonstrates moderate suspicion for malignancy with an intermediate probability of cancer (approximately 20-40% malignancy risk), typically characterized by one or more suspicious features that fall between low suspicion (4A) and high suspicion (4C) categories. 1, 2

Key Ultrasound Features That Define BI-RADS 4B

Primary Suspicious Characteristics

BI-RADS 4B lesions typically exhibit moderately suspicious morphologic features including:

  • Irregular shape without the classic spiculated appearance of highly malignant lesions 2
  • Microlobulated margins (positive predictive value for malignancy of approximately 41.5%) 2, 3
  • Indistinct margins that are neither clearly circumscribed nor overtly spiculated 2
  • Nonparallel orientation (where the lesion is taller than wide), though less pronounced than in 4C lesions 4

Secondary Features

Additional findings that support 4B classification include:

  • Microcalcifications within the mass (significantly associated with malignancy but not definitive) 2, 5
  • Posterior acoustic features that are neither clearly enhancing nor completely shadowing 2
  • Hypoechoic echo pattern without the marked hypoechogenicity typical of higher suspicion lesions 5

Distinguishing 4B from Adjacent Categories

Differentiation from BI-RADS 4A (Lower Suspicion)

BI-RADS 4A lesions (malignancy risk ~10-20%) typically show:

  • Oval shape with circumscribed margins 2
  • Parallel orientation 2, 4
  • Abrupt interface with surrounding tissue 2

The key distinction is that 4B lesions have at least one moderately suspicious feature (microlobulated or indistinct margins, irregular shape) that elevates concern beyond 4A. 2, 3

Differentiation from BI-RADS 4C (Higher Suspicion)

BI-RADS 4C lesions (malignancy risk ~50-75%) demonstrate:

  • Spiculated margins (positive predictive value 80%) 2
  • Marked irregular shape 2
  • Nonparallel orientation with posterior shadowing 4

BI-RADS 4B lacks the classic highly suspicious features of 4C but has more concerning features than 4A. 2, 3

Clinical Context and Malignancy Risk

The positive predictive value for malignancy in BI-RADS 4B lesions ranges from 25% to 41.5% across studies, representing intermediate suspicion. 2, 3, 6 This contrasts with 4A lesions (6-19.5% malignancy rate) and 4C lesions (70-74.3% malignancy rate). 2, 3, 6

Management Implications

All BI-RADS 4B lesions require tissue diagnosis via core needle biopsy regardless of subcategorization, as recommended by NCCN guidelines. 7, 1 The subcategorization primarily helps patients and clinicians understand the intermediate level of concern and alerts pathologists to the degree of suspicion. 3

Important Caveats

The inter-reader reliability of BI-RADS descriptors and subcategorization is only fair-to-moderate, meaning different radiologists may classify the same lesion differently. 4 Despite this limitation, the subcategorization provides valuable risk stratification that is clinically meaningful. 2, 3

Pathology-imaging concordance must be verified after biopsy; discordant benign results in a 4B lesion warrant repeat imaging or additional tissue sampling. 8, 1

References

Guideline

BI-RADS 4 Classification and Coding

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.

Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2015

Research

A New Practical Decision Rule to Better Differentiate BI-RADS 3 or 4 Breast Masses on Breast Ultrasound.

Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2022

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

BIRADS Classification and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Related Questions

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.