What is the prognosis for a patient with scleroderma (systemic sclerosis)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 25, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Prognosis of Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma)

The prognosis of systemic sclerosis is highly variable and depends primarily on disease subtype and organ involvement, with overall 5-year survival approximately 85-90% and 10-year survival 70-82%, but patients with diffuse cutaneous disease, pulmonary arterial hypertension, cardiac involvement, or scleroderma renal crisis face significantly worse outcomes. 1, 2

Overall Survival Rates

Modern cohorts demonstrate improved survival compared to historical data:

  • 5-year survival: 85-90% overall (95% for limited cutaneous SSc, 81% for diffuse cutaneous SSc) 1
  • 10-year survival: 71-82% overall (92% for limited cutaneous SSc, 65% for diffuse cutaneous SSc) 1, 2
  • Standardized mortality ratio (SMR): 3.45-5.73 times higher than the general population 2

The trend shows improving survival over recent decades, likely due to earlier diagnosis, organ-specific screening, and targeted therapies for complications. 1, 3

Disease Subtype as Primary Prognostic Factor

Diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) carries substantially worse prognosis than limited cutaneous disease:

  • Diffuse disease is independently associated with increased mortality (HR 2.9-4.4) even after adjustment for organ involvement 4, 1
  • High modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS >24) at baseline predicts increased mortality risk 5
  • Men are more likely to develop diffuse disease (67% vs 32% in women) and present at younger age 1

Organ-Specific Prognostic Factors

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)

PAH associated with scleroderma spectrum diseases has particularly poor prognosis, worse than idiopathic PAH:

  • 2-year survival with scleroderma-PAH: 40% (compared to 66% for idiopathic PAH) 6
  • Hazard ratio for death with scleroderma-PAH versus idiopathic PAH: 2.32-2.9 6
  • PAH is a leading cause of death in limited cutaneous SSc, accounting for up to 50% of scleroderma-related deaths 6
  • 1-year survival: 67% for collagen vascular disease-associated PAH 6

Cardiac Involvement

Cardiac disease is the strongest independent predictor of mortality:

  • Cardiac involvement is associated with significantly worse survival (P < 0.0001) 1
  • Pericarditis at disease onset is a particularly unfavorable prognostic sign 4
  • Cardiac complications account for approximately 27% of deaths (9 of 33 deaths with known cause) 1

Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)

ILD is a major cause of morbidity and mortality:

  • ILD accounts for approximately 30% of deaths (10 of 33 deaths with known cause) 1
  • Patients with ILD have significantly worse survival (P = 0.006) 1
  • Prognosis correlates with extent of fibrosis: standard mortality rates increase from 2.2 times with no fibrosis to 8.0 times with >25% fibrosis 6
  • Approximately one-third of SSc-ILD patients progress annually, while 70% remain stable 6

Scleroderma Renal Crisis (SRC)

SRC remains a life-threatening complication despite treatment advances:

  • With ACE inhibitor treatment: 76% survival at 1 year, 66% at 5 years 6, 7
  • Without ACE inhibitor treatment: 15% survival at 1 year, 10% at 5 years 6, 7
  • In the Canadian cohort, 4 of 13 patients (31%) with SRC died despite modern management 1
  • Renal complications account for approximately 27% of deaths (9 of 33 deaths with known cause) 1

Additional Prognostic Markers

Clinical Factors Associated with Worse Prognosis

  • Age >60 years at diagnosis 2
  • Male sex 2
  • Systemic hypertension (P = 0.009 for mortality association) 1
  • Gastrointestinal involvement (P = 0.01 for mortality association) 1
  • Anemia (hemoglobin <11-12.5 g/dL associated with 2.5-3 fold increased mortality) 8
  • Elevated ESR (>15-25 mm/h associated with 2.5-3 fold increased mortality) 8

Autoantibody Patterns and Prognosis

Specific autoantibodies predict both organ involvement and overall survival:

  • Anti-topoisomerase I (Scl-70): Associated with ILD and 64% 10-year survival in diffuse disease 8
  • Anti-RNA polymerase III: Associated with scleroderma renal crisis and 75% 10-year survival in diffuse disease 8
  • Anti-centromere antibodies: Associated with delayed PAH development and better prognosis (75% 10-year survival in limited disease) 8
  • Anti-U3-RNP: Associated with PAH in diffuse disease and 61% 10-year survival 8

Critical Pitfalls in Prognostication

Avoid underestimating risk in limited cutaneous disease: While limited disease has better overall prognosis, PAH can develop late in the disease course and is the leading cause of death in this subset. 6

Do not assume stable disease means good prognosis: Approximately one-third of SSc-ILD patients progress annually despite appearing stable, requiring vigilant monitoring. 6

Recognize that corticosteroid use worsens prognosis: Steroids increase SRC risk 4.4-fold (OR 4.4; 95% CI 2.1-9.4), particularly at doses ≥15 mg/day prednisone. 6, 7

Early organ screening is essential: Many life-threatening complications (PAH, ILD, cardiac involvement) can be subclinical at diagnosis, and early detection with treatment improves outcomes. 5, 3

References

Research

Determinants of morbidity and mortality of systemic sclerosis in Canada.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 2010

Guideline

Initial Management of Scleroderma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

ACE Inhibitors in Scleroderma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Prognostic markers for systemic sclerosis.

Joint bone spine, 2006

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.