What is the risk of blindness associated with the use of semaglutide (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) in patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly those with pre-existing diabetic retinopathy or other ocular conditions?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 25, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Risk of Blindness with Semaglutide

Semaglutide carries a documented risk of worsening diabetic retinopathy complications, particularly in patients with pre-existing retinopathy, but does not increase the overall risk of diabetic retinopathy development and has not been definitively linked to permanent blindness. 1, 2

Diabetic Retinopathy Complications

The primary ocular risk with semaglutide is rapid worsening of pre-existing diabetic retinopathy, not new-onset disease or blindness per se. 1, 2

  • In the SUSTAIN-6 cardiovascular outcomes trial, diabetic retinopathy complications occurred in 3.0% of semaglutide-treated patients versus 1.8% with placebo 1
  • The absolute risk increase was substantially higher among patients with baseline diabetic retinopathy (8.2% with semaglutide vs 5.2% placebo) compared to those without known retinopathy (0.7% vs 0.4%) 1
  • This worsening is attributed to rapid A1C reduction rather than direct drug toxicity—a well-established phenomenon with any aggressive glycemic control 2
  • Meta-analyses confirm no association between GLP-1 receptor agonists and retinopathy development except through the mechanism of rapid A1C reduction at 3-month and 1-year follow-up 2

Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION)

  • A 2025 meta-analysis found semaglutide associated with increased odds of NAION (OR 3.92,95% CI 1.02-15.02), though trial sequential analysis indicated insufficient sample size for definitive conclusions 3
  • Current evidence remains inadequate to establish a causal relationship between semaglutide and NAION 3

Risk Stratification and Pre-Treatment Requirements

All patients must undergo comprehensive dilated eye examination before initiating semaglutide if not performed within the last 12 months. 2, 4, 1

Highest Risk Patients:

  • Pre-existing proliferative diabetic retinopathy 4, 1
  • Baseline A1C >9% with concurrent insulin therapy 4
  • Diabetes duration ≥10 years 5
  • Age ≥60 years 5

Lower Risk Patients:

  • No baseline retinopathy 1
  • Well-controlled glycemia at baseline 4

Risk Mitigation Strategies

For patients with established retinopathy, slow the rate of A1C reduction through gradual dose titration and concomitant medication adjustment. 4, 2

  • Reduce total daily insulin dose by 20% when initiating semaglutide to slow glycemic improvement 4
  • For patients on sulfonylureas with well-controlled baseline A1C, reduce sulfonylurea dose by 50% 4
  • Start at the lowest semaglutide dose and up-titrate slowly, particularly in patients with established retinopathy 4
  • Implement strategies to optimize blood pressure and lipid control, which independently reduce retinopathy progression 2, 4

Monitoring Protocol

  • Baseline comprehensive dilated eye examination before treatment initiation 4, 6
  • Consider more frequent ophthalmologic monitoring (every 6 months rather than annually) in high-risk patients 4
  • If any level of diabetic retinopathy is present at baseline, repeat dilated retinal examinations at least annually 6
  • If retinopathy is progressing or sight-threatening, more frequent examinations by an ophthalmologist are required 6

Clinical Decision Algorithm for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

For patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy, consider alternative GLP-1 receptor agonists or other drug classes first, such as SGLT2 inhibitors for cardiovascular risk reduction. 4

  • If cardiovascular disease is present and cardiovascular benefit is the primary goal, the 13% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events with semaglutide may outweigh retinopathy risks in many patients 4
  • Document pre-treatment ophthalmologic assessment and informed consent discussion about retinopathy worsening risks 4
  • Ensure close collaboration with ophthalmology to grade baseline retinopathy severity before initiating therapy 7

Reassuring Evidence

  • Large-scale real-world data from 810,390 semaglutide users showed no increased risk of proliferative diabetic retinopathy compared to dulaglutide, empagliflozin, or sitagliptin 8
  • Risk of treatment-requiring diabetic retinopathy/diabetic macular edema was actually lower with semaglutide compared to dulaglutide, sitagliptin, and glipizide 8
  • Overall meta-analysis of 22,096 patients found semaglutide was not associated with increased diabetic retinopathy risk when all trials were combined (RR 1.14,95% CI 0.98-1.33) 5
  • GLP-1 receptor expression is low in normal human eyes and was not detected in eyes with advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy, suggesting limited direct ocular drug effect 9

Critical Caveat

Do not initiate semaglutide in uncontrolled diabetic patients whose last eye examination was more than 12 months ago until a comprehensive dilated eye examination is performed. 4, 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Semaglutide and Optic Nerve Risk

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Diabetic Retinopathy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Semaglutide and diabetic retinopathy: an OHDSI network study.

BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2025

Research

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor expression in the human eye.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.