What is the most appropriate next step regarding imaging for a patient with persistent posterior ankle pain and mild swelling, who has improved with physical therapy, has full plantar flexion strength, and a negative Achilles squeeze test, and has a history of insidious onset posterior ankle pain with mild fusiform swelling in the mid-Achilles tendon?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 26, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Imaging Recommendation for Persistent Achilles Tendinopathy

MRI of the ankle without IV contrast is the most appropriate next imaging study for this patient with persistent mid-Achilles tendinopathy after 3 months of conservative treatment. 1

Clinical Context

This patient presents with classic Achilles tendinopathy (not rupture), evidenced by:

  • Insidious onset posterior ankle pain with fusiform mid-tendon swelling 2, 3
  • Full plantar flexion strength (intact tendon continuity) 3
  • Negative Achilles squeeze test (excludes complete rupture) 2
  • Symptoms persisting beyond 6 weeks, meeting criteria for chronic ankle pain 1

Why MRI is the Appropriate Next Step

MRI without IV contrast is the reference standard for comprehensive evaluation of tendon pathology when conservative management has not fully resolved symptoms after 3 months. 1

MRI Provides Critical Diagnostic Information:

  • Characterizes the extent and chronicity of tendinopathy, including intratendinous degeneration, partial tears, and peritendinous inflammation 4, 3, 5
  • Evaluates bone marrow edema patterns that may indicate insertional pathology or stress injury 1
  • Identifies associated pathology such as retrocalcaneal bursitis, paratenonitis, or occult calcaneal stress fractures 3, 5
  • Guides surgical planning if debridement or tendon transfer becomes necessary for refractory cases 3, 5

Why Initial Radiographs Are Not Sufficient:

While radiography is appropriate as the initial imaging study for chronic ankle pain 1, this patient has already undergone 3 months of physical therapy with incomplete resolution. Radiographs have limited sensitivity for soft tissue pathology and would likely miss:

  • Intratendinous degeneration and partial tears 4, 3
  • Peritendinous inflammation and adhesions 5
  • Early insertional calcification or bone marrow edema 1, 3

Alternative Imaging Modalities (Less Appropriate)

Ultrasound:

  • Not routinely the next study for chronic Achilles tendinopathy evaluation 1
  • While US can visualize tendon abnormalities, it is operator-dependent and provides limited assessment of bone marrow and deep structures 1

CT Without Contrast:

  • Not routinely used for chronic ankle pain or tendon pathology 1
  • CT is reserved for osseous detail when fracture or complex bony anatomy requires evaluation 1

Bone Scan:

  • Not routinely used for chronic ankle pain evaluation 1
  • Lacks specificity for tendon pathology 1

Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not delay imaging beyond 3 months of failed conservative therapy, as this may miss progressive tendon degeneration requiring surgical intervention 3
  • Do not assume normal strength excludes significant pathology—partial tears and chronic tendinopathy can present with preserved strength initially 2, 3
  • Do not confuse this with acute trauma—the insidious onset and 3-month duration place this firmly in the chronic pain category requiring different imaging algorithms 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Achilles tendon injuries.

Current opinion in rheumatology, 2001

Research

Achilles tendon disorders.

The Medical clinics of North America, 2014

Research

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Musculoskeletal Diseases of Ankle and Foot.

Kathmandu University medical journal (KUMJ), 2018

Research

Magnetic resonance imaging of the foot and ankle.

Magnetic resonance quarterly, 1993

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.