Outpatient GI Follow-up Order for Positive FOBT with Suspected Hemorrhoidal Bleeding
Despite suspected hemorrhoidal bleeding, this patient requires urgent outpatient colonoscopy within 60 days of the positive FOBT, as hemorrhoidal bleeding does not produce occult blood and a positive FOBT should never be attributed to hemorrhoids without complete colonic evaluation. 1, 2
Critical Clinical Principle
A positive fecal occult blood test cannot be attributed to hemorrhoids—hemorrhoidal bleeding presents as bright red blood that drips or squirts into the toilet, not as occult (hidden) blood detected on testing. 2 Complete colonic evaluation by colonoscopy is mandatory even when hemorrhoids are present. 2
Order Writing Template
Outpatient GI Referral Order:
- Urgent GI consultation for colonoscopy within 60 days for positive FOBT 1
- Indication: Positive fecal occult blood test requiring definitive evaluation; patient has history of non-compliance with inpatient bowel prep due to vomiting
- Request: Outpatient colonoscopy with GI specialist experienced in managing patients with bowel prep intolerance
- Note to GI: Patient refused inpatient colonoscopy due to vomiting with bowel prep. Please consider split-dose prep regimen or alternative prep methods to improve tolerance and compliance
- Clinical context: Suspected hemorrhoidal bleeding noted on examination, but positive FOBT requires full colonic evaluation per guidelines
Anusol (Hydrocortisone Rectal) Dosing
For symptomatic hemorrhoid management:
- Hydrocortisone 1% rectal suppository: Insert 1 suppository rectally twice daily (morning and evening) for up to 7 days 3
- Alternative: Hydrocortisone 1% rectal cream: Apply to affected area 2-3 times daily
Additional conservative management (strongly recommended): 3
- Increase dietary fiber intake
- Increase water intake
- Establish adequate bathroom habits
- Consider flavonoids to relieve hemorrhoid symptoms 3
Why This Approach is Critical
Colonoscopy is Non-Negotiable
- The American Cancer Society and American Gastroenterological Association recommend colonoscopy as the only appropriate follow-up test after positive FOBT 1
- Repeating FOBT is inappropriate and delays proper diagnostic evaluation 1
- Flexible sigmoidoscopy alone is inadequate as it only visualizes the distal colon and may miss significant proximal lesions 1
Timing Matters for Outcomes
- Delays beyond 180 days significantly increase colorectal cancer risk (OR: 1.48 after 270 days) 1
- Each additional month of delay increases CRC incidence by 0.3% and mortality by 1.4% 1
- A 12-month delay increases CRC incidence by 4% and mortality by 16% 1
The Hemorrhoid Pitfall
- Anemia from hemorrhoids is extremely rare (0.5 patients per 100,000 population) 2
- When positive FOBT occurs with hemorrhoids, complete colonic evaluation is mandatory 2
- Nearly one-third of FOBT-positive patients have significant neoplasia that would be missed if evaluation is deferred 1
Addressing the Bowel Prep Challenge
Key communication points for the GI referral:
- Document the specific issue: vomiting with standard bowel prep
- Request consideration of split-dose prep regimens (better tolerated)
- Consider low-volume prep options
- Emphasize to patient that colonoscopy is the only acceptable follow-up and alternative tests (repeat FOBT, sigmoidoscopy alone) are not appropriate 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never repeat the FOBT after a positive result—this is inappropriate practice that delays diagnosis 1
- Never attribute positive FOBT to hemorrhoids without full evaluation 2
- Never use single-sample in-office FOBT collected during digital rectal exam (sensitivity only 4.9% for advanced neoplasia) 1
- Never delay colonoscopy beyond 60 days without compelling medical contraindication 1
If Colonoscopy Absolutely Cannot Be Performed
Only if colonoscopy is truly impossible (not just patient preference): 1
- CT colonography has 88.8% sensitivity for ≥6mm adenomas or CRC in FOBT-positive patients
- Double-contrast barium enema is less sensitive (75-80%) but can be used if CTC unavailable
- However, these are inferior alternatives—colonoscopy remains the gold standard 1