What is the recurrence rate for a patient with stage 4 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after initial treatment with first-line therapies such as sunitinib (Sutent) or pazopanib (Votrient), or immunotherapy with nivolumab (Opdivo)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 27, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recurrence/Progression Rates in Stage 4 Renal Cell Carcinoma

The majority of patients with stage 4 renal cell carcinoma will experience disease progression despite first-line therapy, with approximately 69-78% of patients progressing on immunotherapy and median progression-free survival ranging from 8-16 months depending on treatment regimen and risk stratification. 1, 2

Progression Rates by Treatment Regimen

Immunotherapy-Based Combinations

  • Nivolumab plus cabozantinib: Median PFS of 16.6 months, meaning approximately 50% of patients progress by this timepoint 2

  • Nivolumab plus ipilimumab: In intermediate/poor-risk patients, median PFS was 11.6 months, with 69% of patients experiencing progression during the trial period 1, 3

  • Pembrolizumab plus axitinib: Median PFS of 15.1 months in the intent-to-treat population 1

  • Nivolumab monotherapy: 78% of patients progressed after initial treatment, with 69% experiencing progression in phase 2 trials 1

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Monotherapy

  • Sunitinib: Median PFS varies significantly by IMDC risk group 4:

    • Favorable risk: 14.1 months
    • Intermediate risk: 10.7 months
    • Poor risk: 2.4 months
    • Overall median PFS: 8.4-11 months 1, 2, 3
  • Pazopanib: Median PFS of 11.1 months in treatment-naïve patients, with 9.2 months in the overall study population 1

Risk-Stratified Progression Patterns

IMDC risk stratification is critical for predicting progression rates, as outcomes vary dramatically 5, 4:

  • Favorable risk (0 factors): Median PFS exceeds 13-14 months with TKI monotherapy, with even better outcomes on combination immunotherapy 1, 4

  • Intermediate risk (1-2 factors): Median PFS of 10-11 months with TKI monotherapy, improved to 11-16 months with combination immunotherapy 1, 2, 4, 3

  • Poor risk (3-6 factors): Median PFS of only 2.4 months with sunitinib monotherapy, highlighting the aggressive nature of disease in this subgroup 4

Treatment Beyond Progression

A subset of patients may benefit from continuing immunotherapy beyond radiographic progression, though this represents a highly selected population 1:

  • Of patients treated with nivolumab beyond first progression, 69% experienced subsequent tumor reduction or stabilization 1

  • In CheckMate 025,48% of patients who progressed continued nivolumab for ≥4 weeks after progression, with 13% experiencing ≥30% tumor burden reduction 1

  • This strategy should only be considered in patients with clinical benefit, asymptomatic progression, and good performance status 1

Overall Survival Context

While progression is common, modern therapies have substantially improved overall survival 5, 2, 3:

  • Median OS with nivolumab plus cabozantinib: 49.5 months 2
  • Median OS with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (intermediate/poor risk): Not reached at 18 months, with 75% alive at 18 months 3
  • Median OS with sunitinib: 26-35.5 months depending on trial 2, 3

Critical Caveats

Metastatic site significantly impacts progression risk, with bone and liver metastases conferring worse prognosis than lung-only disease 5

Performance status is paramount: Patients with Karnofsky performance status <80% have substantially higher progression rates across all treatment regimens 5

Complete response rates remain low (5-13% with combination immunotherapy), meaning most responding patients will eventually progress 1, 2, 3

Related Questions

What is the significance of a 3 mm nodule found in the fat anterior to the psoas muscle, below the lower pole of the left kidney, on imaging 3 years after a partial nephrectomy for a 1.3 cm exophytic Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC)?
What is the recommended follow-up and treatment plan for a 68-year-old man with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) status post cryoablation in 2014?
What is the recommended initial approach for a 76-year-old man with a 1.6 cm x 1.3 cm left renal lesion consistent with renal cell carcinoma?
What is the recommended imaging test for a patient with a suspected renal cell carcinoma upon hospital discharge?
Is a 3 mm nodule in the fat anterior to the psoas muscle, which has become more prominent over 3 years, more likely a malignant or benign process following a partial nephrectomy for a 1.3 cm exophytic Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC)?
What are the symptoms and treatment options for a patient with chickenpox, including those with weakened immune systems or underlying health conditions?
Can a non-contrast (without contrast media) chest computed tomography (CT) scan diagnose pericarditis?
What are the discharge instructions for a new mother after a normal vaginal delivery or cesarean section (C-section)?
What is the difference in neuropsychological testing performance between university-educated individuals and the normal population?
How do you differentiate between scleritis, episcleritis, and conjunctivitis on a patient's exam, considering their symptoms, medical history, and physical examination findings?
What are the standard discharge instructions for a healthy adult female with no significant medical history after giving birth to a newborn?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.