What is the recommended treatment for an adult patient, likely with a history of multiple pregnancies, obesity, or previous abdominal surgery, presenting with a paraumbilical hernia?

Paraumbilical Hernia Management in Adults

Primary Recommendation

For adult patients with paraumbilical hernias, elective surgical repair with mesh reinforcement is the definitive treatment, with the choice between open and laparoscopic approaches guided by defect size, patient factors (particularly obesity), and clinical presentation. 1, 2

---

Initial Assessment and Risk Stratification

Determine Urgency of Intervention

Emergency repair is mandatory if:

• Incarceration with inability to reduce contents 2
• Signs of strangulation (continuous abdominal pain, fever, tachycardia, peritoneal signs) 3
• Skin ulceration or breakdown over the hernia 2
• Bowel obstruction symptoms 3

Delayed diagnosis beyond 24 hours significantly increases mortality risk in complicated hernias, making early recognition critical. 3, 1

Assess Defect Size and Complexity

• Defects <2 cm: May be managed conservatively if asymptomatic, though surgical repair remains definitive treatment 2, 4
• Defects 2-5 cm: Standard repair with mesh reinforcement recommended 1
• Defects >5 cm: Require mesh interposition with adequate overlap (1.5-2.5 cm beyond defect edge) 1

Identify High-Risk Features

Risk factors that increase complication rates include: 3

• Obesity (particularly relevant for paraumbilical hernias)
• Diabetes mellitus
• Smoking
• Immunosuppression
• Previous abdominal surgery
• Ascites

---

Treatment Algorithm for Uncomplicated Paraumbilical Hernias

Open Mesh Repair (Standard Approach)

Open repair with mesh is the most commonly performed technique and offers:

• Shorter operative time (mean 27-42 minutes vs 56-58 minutes for laparoscopic) 4, 5
• Ability to perform under local anesthesia in select cases 1
• Lower cost 1
• Possibility of same-day discharge (35% of patients discharged within 12 hours) 4

Technical considerations:

• Mesh should overlap defect by 1.5-2.5 cm 1
• Sublay (retrorectus) mesh placement preferred when feasible 6
• Primary suture repair alone has unacceptably high recurrence rates (up to 42% for defects >3 cm) and should be avoided 1

Expected complications:

• Wound infection: 15% 7
• Seroma: 19% 7
• Hematoma: 38% 7
• Recurrence: 3.7% with suture repair, significantly lower with mesh 4

Laparoscopic Repair (Selective Use)

Laparoscopic repair should be specifically considered for:

• Obese patients (where open access is more challenging) 4
• Suspected multiple hernial defects 4
• Patients desiring faster return to activities 5

Advantages of laparoscopic approach:

• Significantly reduced postoperative pain (pain score 2.95 vs 6.10 for open at 6 hours) 5
• Lower analgesic requirements 5
• Reduced wound infection rates (4.3% vs 15% for open) 4, 5
• Earlier return to normal activities 5
• Ability to identify occult hernias 1
• Zero recurrence in reported series 4, 5

Disadvantages:

• Longer operative time (56-58 minutes vs 27-42 minutes) 4, 5
• Requires general anesthesia 1
• Longer hospital stay (1.4 days vs 0.8 days) 4
• 5% conversion rate to open 5
• Higher cost 1

---

Management of Complicated/Emergency Paraumbilical Hernias

Incarcerated Hernia Without Strangulation

Prosthetic mesh repair with synthetic mesh is strongly recommended (Grade 1A) in clean surgical fields (CDC class I) when there are no signs of strangulation or need for bowel resection. 1

Surgical approach selection:

• Laparoscopic (TAPP or TEP) when no clinical signs of strangulation or peritonitis present 1
• Open preperitoneal approach when strangulation suspected or bowel resection may be needed 1
• Local anesthesia can be used for open repair in absence of bowel gangrene 1

Strangulated Hernia

Immediate surgical intervention is mandatory to prevent bowel necrosis and death. 3, 1

Predictors of strangulation requiring emergency surgery:

• SIRS criteria (fever, tachycardia, leukocytosis) 3, 1
• Elevated lactate, CPK, and D-dimer levels 1
• Contrast-enhanced CT showing bowel wall ischemia 1
• Continuous abdominal pain with peritoneal signs 3

Intraoperative assessment:

• Hernioscopy (laparoscopy through hernia sac) can assess bowel viability, avoiding unnecessary laparotomy and decreasing hospital stay 1
• Open approach preferred when bowel resection anticipated 1

Mesh use in contaminated fields:

• Clean-contaminated (CDC class II): Synthetic mesh can still be used even with intestinal strangulation and/or bowel resection without gross spillage 1
• Contaminated/dirty fields: Biological or biosynthetic meshes preferred, or consider primary repair for small defects (<3 cm) 1

---

Special Considerations for Very Small Defects (<2 cm)

Conservative Management May Be Appropriate When:

• Defect is truly <5 mm and completely asymptomatic 2
• No occupational concerns (heavy lifting, increased intra-abdominal pressure activities) 2
• Patient understands risks and prefers observation 2

Monitoring protocol if observation chosen:

• Physical examination every 6-12 months to assess for enlargement 2
• Patient education on warning signs: sudden pain, irreducibility, skin changes, nausea/vomiting 2
• Immediate evaluation if incarceration symptoms develop 2

However, surgical repair remains definitive treatment and should be offered, as incarceration risk exists and progression to larger defects is common. 2

---

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Critical Errors:

1. Delaying repair of strangulated hernias beyond 24 hours dramatically increases mortality 3, 1

2. Using primary suture repair without mesh for defects >3 cm results in 42% recurrence rate 1

3. Performing laparoscopic repair when strangulation suspected - open approach allows better assessment and management of compromised bowel 1

4. Underestimating defect size - always measure intraoperatively and ensure mesh overlap of 1.5-2.5 cm 1

5. Assuming all paraumbilical hernias in obese patients are simple - may have massive lymphoedematous apron obscuring relatively small primary defect 6

Technical Considerations:

• In obese patients with large abdominal aprons, CT imaging preoperatively helps define true hernia size and contents 6
• Mesh fixation should avoid areas near vital structures 1
• Adequate hemostasis critical given high hematoma rate (38%) 7

---

Postoperative Management

Pain Control:

• Prioritize acetaminophen and NSAIDs as primary analgesics 1
• Limit opioid prescribing: 15 tablets hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/325mg or 10 tablets oxycodone 5mg for laparoscopic repair 1

Monitoring for Complications:

• Wound infection (15%), seroma (19%), hematoma (38%) most common early complications 7
• Follow-up at 1 and 3 months postoperatively to detect early complications 7
• Long-term recurrence monitoring, though rates significantly lower with mesh (0-3.7% vs 19-42% without mesh) 1, 4