Who is a Candidate for Inspire (Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation)?
Inspire therapy is indicated for adults with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (AHI 15-65 events/hour) who have failed or cannot tolerate CPAP, with BMI <32 kg/m², and absence of complete concentric collapse at the soft palate level on drug-induced sleep endoscopy. 1
Mandatory Eligibility Criteria
Age and Disease Severity
- Age ≥18 years is required for hypoglossal nerve stimulation 1
- AHI between 15-65 events per hour documented on polysomnography within 24 months 1
- The Veterans Administration/Department of Defense guidelines specifically recommend AHI 15-65/h as the therapeutic window 1
- Success rates drop significantly with AHI >50, falling from 100% in patients with AHI <30 to only 50% in those with AHI >50 1
Body Mass Index Requirements
- BMI must be <32 kg/m² according to the most stringent guideline recommendations 1
- Some guidelines allow BMI <40 kg/m², but the stricter <32 kg/m² threshold predicts better anatomical features and surgical efficacy 1
- Patients with BMI <30 kg/m² have shorter anterior cranial base, smaller mandible, and retroposition that creates narrower velopharyngeal spaces—anatomical features that predict better surgical outcomes 2, 1
CPAP Failure Documentation
- Documented CPAP intolerance or failure is mandatory before considering hypoglossal nerve stimulation 1
- Comprehensive CPAP optimization must be attempted, including mask refitting, pressure adjustments, heated humidification, and behavioral interventions 1
- A trial of BPAP should be considered if high CPAP pressures were the primary intolerance issue 1
- The American Academy of Sleep Medicine strongly recommends against delaying definitive treatment with prolonged attempts at CPAP optimization once true intolerance is documented 1
Critical Anatomical Assessment
Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE)
- DISE is required to confirm absence of complete concentric collapse at the soft palate level, as this anatomical pattern predicts failure of hypoglossal nerve stimulation 1
- Nasofibroscopy and complete clinical examination must evaluate the three major anatomic regions: nose, palate (oropharynx), and base of tongue (hypopharynx) 2
- The Friedman staging system should be used to score palate position and tonsil size 2, 1
Favorable Anatomical Features
- Minimal tonsil tissue and tongue position that improves with jaw thrust maneuver indicate favorable anatomy 1
- Patients without obvious micrognathia or bony anatomic abnormalities respond better 2
- Hypopharyngeal obstruction at the base of tongue (present in 80% of surgical candidates) is typically amenable to hypoglossal nerve stimulation 2
Absolute Contraindications
Medical Exclusions
- Central or mixed sleep apnea patterns are absolute contraindications 1
- History of respiratory or cardiac failure within the past year excludes patients from surgical intervention 2
- Active smoking is a contraindication; patients must stop smoking at least 1 month prior to surgery 2
Anatomical Exclusions
- Complete concentric collapse at the soft palate level on DISE predicts failure 1
- Obvious micrognathia or bony anatomic abnormalities predict insufficient response 2
- Previous failed uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) surgery suggests poor surgical candidacy 2
Dental Contraindications
- Severe periodontal disease, severe temporomandibular disorders, inadequate dentition, or severe gag reflex contraindicate mandibular advancement devices but not hypoglossal nerve stimulation 1
Treatment Algorithm Position
First-Line Therapy
- CPAP remains the gold standard first-line treatment for moderate-to-severe OSA 1
- Educational and behavioral interventions should accompany PAP therapy initiation 1
- BPAP is offered for patients unable to tolerate CPAP due to high pressure requirements 1
Second-Line Consideration
- Hypoglossal nerve stimulation is a second-line therapy reserved for documented CPAP failure or intolerance 1
- The European Respiratory Society issued a conditional recommendation against hypoglossal nerve stimulation as first-line treatment 1
- Mandibular advancement devices are less effective than CPAP and inappropriate for moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI >30); they would represent a therapeutic step-down 1
Third-Line Options
- Multilevel surgery is reserved for hypoglossal nerve stimulation failure and has higher morbidity including velopharyngeal insufficiency, dysphagia, and mandibular fracture 1
Important Clinical Considerations
Pre-Operative Requirements
- Polysomnography within 24 months is mandatory 1
- Multidisciplinary evaluation by maxillofacial surgeon, neurophysiologist, and pulmonologist may be beneficial 2
- Weight reduction should be pursued concurrently with planning, as lower BMI predicts better outcomes 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not delay definitive treatment with prolonged weight loss attempts when the patient has symptomatic moderate-to-severe OSA 1
- Do not cycle through additional PAP variants after documented CPAP and BPAP failure 1
- Do not assume positional therapy is adequate without documentation that OSA is predominantly positional 1
- Only about 10% of screened patients typically meet all criteria, highlighting the need for careful patient evaluation 1
Expected Outcomes
- Surgical success (AHI decrease >50% and overall AHI ≤20) occurs in 66% of implanted subjects 3
- Long-term follow-up data (≥5 years) confirms sustained safety and efficacy 1
- Adherence to hypoglossal nerve stimulation is superior to CPAP 1
- Significant improvements in quality of life measures and Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores are documented 1, 4