Is Budd-Chiari syndrome a contraindication to Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) procedure?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 27, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Is Budd-Chiari Syndrome a Contraindication to TIPS?

No, Budd-Chiari syndrome is not a contraindication to TIPS—in fact, TIPS is strongly recommended as a primary treatment option for patients who fail medical therapy with anticoagulation or when hepatic vein interventions are unsuccessful or not technically feasible. 1

TIPS as Primary Treatment for Budd-Chiari Syndrome

Budd-Chiari syndrome represents a specific indication for TIPS, not a contraindication. The 2020 Gut guidelines provide clear direction on when to proceed with TIPS in this population:

TIPS is recommended where patients fail to respond to medical therapy with anticoagulation or hepatic vein interventions (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). 1 This represents a stepwise approach where anticoagulation is initiated first, followed by consideration of hepatic vein interventions (such as angioplasty or stenting for short-segment obstructions), and then TIPS if these measures fail. 1

TIPS can be considered where hepatic vein interventions are not technically feasible (weak recommendation, low-quality evidence). 1 This applies particularly to patients with diffuse hepatic vein thrombosis or complete occlusion of all hepatic veins where direct venous recanalization is impossible. 2

Clinical Outcomes Support TIPS Use

The evidence strongly supports TIPS efficacy in Budd-Chiari syndrome with excellent long-term outcomes:

  • 5-year transplant-free survival rates of 71-78% even in high-risk patients, which substantially exceeds predicted survival without TIPS 3
  • 1-year survival rates of 80-100% across multiple series 2
  • Symptom resolution exceeding 70% with significant improvements in ascites, liver function, and portal hypertension-related complications 1, 4
  • Primary assisted patency of 93.3% when shunt dysfunction is appropriately managed 4

Critical Management Requirements

All patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome must be managed in centers of high expertise which are either transplant centers or have formal links with a liver transplant center (strong recommendation, very low-quality evidence). 1 This is non-negotiable given the technical complexity of TIPS in this population and the need for multidisciplinary expertise in hematology, interventional radiology, and hepatology. 1

When to Avoid TIPS in Budd-Chiari Syndrome

While Budd-Chiari syndrome itself is not a contraindication, certain clinical scenarios warrant extreme caution or consideration of direct liver transplantation:

Patients with BCS-TIPS prognostic score >7 have very poor outcomes (7 out of 8 died or required transplantation) and should be considered for early liver transplantation rather than TIPS. 3 This score incorporates bilirubin, age, and INR—the specific variables that independently predict 1-year transplant-free survival. 3

Fulminant Budd-Chiari syndrome with acute liver failure carries high mortality even with TIPS (mortality rates of 50% in some series), and these patients should be evaluated for super-urgent liver transplantation. 1, 5, 6 The 2003 Journal of Hepatology study demonstrated that among 8 patients with hepatic failure, 4 died soon after TIPS from complications including liver rupture, portal vein rupture, liver failure, and pulmonary edema. 5

Patients with poor prognostic scores or those who do not respond to anticoagulation and radiological therapies should be considered for liver transplant assessment (strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). 1

Technical Considerations Unique to Budd-Chiari

TIPS placement in Budd-Chiari syndrome is technically more challenging than in cirrhotic portal hypertension. 1 In cases where all hepatic veins are occluded, a direct intrahepatic portocaval shunt (DIPS) may be performed as an alternative, where a tract is created by direct puncture from the IVC through the liver to the portal vein. 1 Clinical outcomes following DIPS are similar to classical TIPS. 1

In 5 out of 15 cases (33%), TIPS required a transcaval approach due to complete hepatic vein occlusion. 4 This underscores the importance of performing these procedures at experienced centers.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Failing to initiate anticoagulation immediately—anticoagulation should be started as soon as Budd-Chiari syndrome is diagnosed and continued indefinitely, even after TIPS placement 7, 8
  • Not screening for underlying myeloproliferative disorders—approximately 49% of Budd-Chiari cases are caused by myeloproliferative neoplasms, and the JAK2V617F mutation is found in 45% of patients 7
  • Proceeding with TIPS in fulminant presentations without transplant evaluation—these patients may be better served by direct listing for transplantation 1, 5
  • Using bare metal stents instead of covered stents—covered PTFE stents significantly improve primary patency rates 1, 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.