Right-Side Impella (Impella RP) Protocol
The Impella RP should be initiated in patients with right ventricular failure refractory to medical management, with immediate hemodynamic monitoring and anticoagulation starting with a UFH bolus of 100 U/kg (maximum 5000 units) at implantation. 1
Patient Selection and Indications
Primary indications for Impella RP include:
- Right ventricular failure following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation 2
- Right ventricular failure after acute myocardial infarction with right ventricular involvement 3, 2
- Right ventricular failure post-cardiotomy 2
- Acute-on-chronic right heart decompensation 4
- Biventricular failure requiring combined left and right ventricular support 1, 5
The device is specifically designed for right ventricular support, providing up to 4.0 L/min of flow through a percutaneous approach. 1
Pre-Implantation Assessment
Before device placement, confirm:
- Refractory right ventricular failure despite optimal medical therapy (typically requiring ≥3 inotropes/vasopressors) 2
- Baseline hemodynamics showing elevated central venous pressure (typically >15-19 mm Hg) and reduced cardiac index (typically <2.0 L/min/m²) 2
- Absence of contraindications including severe peripheral artery disease, right ventricular thrombus, or severe tricuspid stenosis 1
Implantation Protocol
The Impella RP is inserted percutaneously via the right internal jugular vein or femoral vein approach: 6, 2
- The device is advanced through the inferior vena cava, right atrium, and right ventricle, with the inlet positioned in the inferior vena cava and outlet in the pulmonary artery 1
- Fluoroscopic guidance is used to ensure proper positioning 2
- Device delivery success rate is approximately 97% 2
Anticoagulation Management
Initiate anticoagulation immediately at implantation: 1
- Administer UFH bolus of 100 U/kg (maximum 5000 units) at device insertion 1
- Maintain continuous UFH infusion targeting aPTT 1.5-2.0 times control or anti-Xa levels 0.3-0.5 units/mL 1
- Critical caveat: Bleeding requiring transfusion occurs in 63.6% of patients, necessitating careful balance between thrombotic and hemorrhagic risks 5
Hemodynamic Monitoring Protocol
Immediate post-implantation monitoring should document: 1, 2
- Cardiac index improvement (expect increase from ~1.8 to ~3.3 L/min/m²) 2
- Central venous pressure reduction (expect decrease from ~19 to ~13 mm Hg) 2
- Mean arterial pressure maintenance >65 mm Hg 1
- End-organ perfusion markers (lactate clearance, urine output, mental status) 1
Monitor motor current continuously as it reflects device function and hemodynamic status. 1
Inotrope and Vasopressor Management
- Begin weaning inotropes and vasopressors as hemodynamics improve 5
- When additional vasopressor support is needed, prefer vasopressin or norepinephrine as they increase systemic afterload without significantly increasing pulmonary vascular resistance 1
- Avoid excessive inotrope use that increases myocardial oxygen demand 1
Daily Management and Monitoring
Daily assessments must include: 3, 1
- Hemodynamic parameters (cardiac output, central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure) 1
- Device function verification (motor current, flow parameters, absence of suction alarms) 7
- Laboratory monitoring: complete blood count (hemolysis occurs in 86.4% of patients), renal function (68.2% require hemodialysis), coagulation parameters 5
- Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function recovery 1
- Volume status and diuretic requirements 3
Critical pitfall: Hemolysis is nearly universal (86.4%) with Impella RP support and requires close monitoring of hemoglobin, LDH, haptoglobin, and plasma-free hemoglobin. 5
Duration of Support
Typical support duration is 3-7 days (range 0.5-14 days): 5, 2
- Average duration in clinical trials: 3.0 ± 1.5 days 2
- Extended support up to 14 days has been reported 5
- Duration depends on right ventricular recovery, resolution of precipitating factors, and transition to definitive therapy 1
Weaning Protocol
Initiate weaning when the following criteria are met: 1
- Improved right ventricular function on serial echocardiography 1
- Reduced inotrope/vasopressor requirements 1
- Adequate end-organ perfusion without device support 1
- Resolution of precipitating factors (if applicable) 1
Weaning approach:
- Gradually reduce device flow while monitoring hemodynamics 1
- If hemodynamics deteriorate during weaning, resume full support and reassess in 24-48 hours 1
- For patients failing weaning attempts, consider longer support duration or transition to durable mechanical circulatory support 1
Management of Complications
Suction alarms require immediate assessment: 7
- Verify power connections and battery status 7
- Assess device position with fluoroscopy or echocardiography 7
- Optimize volume status (hypovolemia is the most common cause) 7
- Consider controller malfunction and exchange if persistent 7
Bleeding management: 5
- Occurs in 63.6% of patients requiring transfusion 5
- Balance anticoagulation intensity against bleeding risk 1
- Consider reducing anticoagulation targets in active bleeding while maintaining minimum therapeutic levels 1
Hemolysis management: 5
- Expected in 86.4% of patients 5
- Monitor hemolysis markers daily 5
- Severe hemolysis may necessitate device removal 5
Escalation Strategy for Inadequate Response
If patient deteriorates despite Impella RP support: 1
- Assess for device malfunction or inadequate positioning 1
- For biventricular failure, add left-sided Impella support to create bilateral Impella configuration 1
- Consider VA-ECMO for patients requiring greater systemic circulatory support, maintaining Impella RP for right ventricular decompression 1
- Evaluate for candidacy for durable LVAD, biventricular assist device, or heart transplantation 1
Outcomes and Prognosis
Expected outcomes with Impella RP support: 5, 2
- Overall 30-day survival: 68-73% 5, 2
- All patients discharged alive remain alive at 180 days 2
- Among survivors: transition to heart transplant, durable LVAD, or recovery to discharge 5
- 30-day heart failure readmission rate: 20% 5
Prognostic factors: Patients in SCAI stage D-E cardiogenic shock have the highest mortality risk, with stage E patients showing 27.3% representation in recent series. 5