What is the best test to order for a patient with suspected Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) to get quantitative results, rather than just a reactive or non-reactive result?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 27, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

HSV Testing with Quantitative Results

Order type-specific HSV serologic testing using enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA), which provide index values (quantitative antibody measurements) rather than just reactive/non-reactive results. 1

Understanding HSV Serologic Index Values

The commercially available FDA-approved HSV serologic assays provide index values that represent quantitative measures of antibody levels present in the blood 1:

  • HerpeSelect EIA reports results as index values with the following interpretation per manufacturer's label 1:

    • <0.9 = negative
    • 0.9–1.1 = indeterminate
    • 1.1 = positive

  • Index values are the "actual numbers" you're seeking, as they quantify the amount of HSV antibody detected rather than simply reporting reactive/non-reactive 1

Critical Limitations You Must Know

The index value directly impacts test accuracy, particularly for HSV-2 1:

  • Index values of 1.1–2.9 have only 39.8% specificity compared to Western blot (meaning high false-positive rate) 1
  • Index values of ≥3.0 have 78.6% specificity (still suboptimal but better) 1
  • Overall HSV-2 specificity is only 57.4% when compared to the gold standard Western blot 1

For HSV-1 serologic testing, the opposite problem exists - these assays lack sensitivity at only 70.2%, meaning false-negatives are common 1

Recommended Testing Strategy Based on Clinical Scenario

If Active Lesions Are Present:

Do NOT order serology - instead order HSV NAAT/PCR from the lesion, which can provide quantitative viral load results 1, 2, 3:

  • PCR assays can quantify HSV DNA copies per mL, giving you actual viral load numbers 3, 4
  • One study reported median viral loads of 4.2 × 10⁶ copies/reaction for first-episode infections versus 1.0 × 10⁴ for recurrent infections 3
  • PCR has 11-71% superior sensitivity compared to viral culture 2, 5

If No Active Lesions Present:

Order type-specific HSV-1 and HSV-2 serology with index values 1:

  • Request the laboratory report the actual index value, not just positive/negative 1
  • For HSV-2 results with index values <3.0, confirm with a second assay (Biokit HSV-2 rapid test or Western blot) before informing the patient of positive results 1
  • Using confirmatory testing improves positive predictive value from 80.5% to 95.6% 1
  • Index values ≥3.0 may be sufficient without confirmatory testing, though false-positives still occur 1

Important Caveats

  • Wait 12 weeks after suspected exposure before ordering serology, as the window period can be up to 12 weeks and earlier testing may yield false-negatives 1
  • Patients with HSV-1 infection are more likely to have false-positive HSV-2 results with low index values 1
  • The Western blot remains the gold standard but has limited availability in most clinical settings 1

What to Order Specifically

Request: "Type-specific HSV-1 and HSV-2 IgG antibody testing by EIA or CLIA with index values reported" and specify that you need the numerical index value, not just a qualitative interpretation 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach for Suspected HSV Oral Ulcers

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Laboratory Testing for Oral Herpes

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.