Living Liver Donor Evaluation Checklist
Living liver donor evaluation requires a comprehensive, multi-phase assessment encompassing medical screening, anatomic imaging, liver biopsy, and mandatory independent psychosocial evaluation to ensure donor safety and graft suitability. 1
Ethical Prerequisites
Before initiating any evaluation, confirm these fundamental criteria are met:
- Liver transplantation must be the only therapeutic option for the recipient, OR deceased donor transplantation is not available, OR a deceased donor organ has not become available 2
- The likelihood of recipient survival following living donor liver transplantation must be high 2
- The mortality risk to the donor must be low (generally <0.5%) 1
- Donor safety is the absolute highest priority, as the donor undergoes major surgery for no personal medical benefit 1
Phase 1: Initial Screening
Relationship and Blood Type Compatibility
- Verify donor-recipient relationship (related donors preferred, though non-related donors are acceptable at experienced centers) 2, 3
- Confirm ABO blood group compatibility 4
Basic Medical Assessment
- Complete history and physical examination focusing on:
Laboratory Evaluation
- Complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, coagulation studies 6
- Liver function tests (AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, albumin) 6
- Renal function (creatinine, creatinine clearance) 2, 6
- Fasting glucose and hemoglobin A1c 6
- Lipid panel 6
Infectious Disease Screening
- Hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B core antibody, hepatitis B surface antibody 2, 6
- Hepatitis C antibody and RNA if positive 2, 6
- HIV antibody 2, 6
- Cytomegalovirus IgG 2, 6
- Epstein-Barr virus IgG 2, 6
- Rapid plasma reagin (syphilis) 6
Phase 2: Anatomic and Volumetric Assessment
Cross-Sectional Imaging
- CT angiography or MRI/MRCP to evaluate:
Volumetric Requirements
- Calculate future liver remnant volume (must be adequate to prevent donor hepatic insufficiency) 6
- Assess graft-to-recipient weight ratio (typically ≥0.8% for adequate recipient function) 6
Phase 3: Liver Biopsy Assessment
Liver biopsy should be part of the routine evaluation protocol for all living liver donors, as approximately 50% of apparently healthy donors have abnormal pathology 5
Biopsy Indications and Findings
- Perform liver biopsy even when liver function tests are normal and imaging appears normal 5
- Assess for steatosis: Macrovesicular steatosis >30% is generally a contraindication to donation, as it reduces functional graft mass and increases risk of poor graft function 1
- Evaluate for occult liver disease: fibrosis, hepatitis, steatohepatitis, granulomatous reactions 5
- Document percentage of steatosis, inflammation grade, and fibrosis stage 5
Specific Pathology Considerations
- Steatosis 10-30% requires careful consideration and may be acceptable in select cases 4
- Any fibrosis beyond minimal portal fibrosis should prompt reconsideration 5
- Steatohepatitis is typically a contraindication 5
Phase 4: Cardiopulmonary Evaluation
Cardiac Assessment
Echocardiography to assess:
Dobutamine stress echocardiography for:
Cardiac catheterization if stress test is positive 2
Pulmonary Assessment
Phase 5: Genetic and Metabolic Considerations
For recipients with inherited metabolic liver diseases, genetic testing of related donors is essential to exclude carrier states that could compromise graft function 1
Acceptable Heterozygote Donor Conditions
- Crigler-Najjar syndrome type 1 2, 1
- Wilson's disease 2, 1
- Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency 2, 1
- Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis 2, 1
- Carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1 deficiency 2
- Propionic acidemia 2
- Arginosuccinic aciduria 2
- Tyrosinemia 2
Special Considerations for Alagille Syndrome
- If the potential donor and recipient share the same mutant Jagged 1 or Notch 2 allele, the donor must be carefully evaluated for bile duct hypoplasia and vascular anomalies 2
- Donor evaluation must include liver biopsy and/or cholangiography to rule out bile duct hypoplasia 2
- Living-related liver transplantation is not advisable in most circumstances when shared mutations exist 2
Phase 6: Mandatory Psychosocial Evaluation
Independent psychological assessment by a psychiatrist or psychologist is mandatory to ensure informed consent and absence of coercion 1
Key Assessment Components
- Evaluation for external pressure from family members or social circumstances 1
- Assessment for internal pressure or guilt-driven motivation 1
- Confirmation of donor's understanding of risks, including:
Donor Autonomy Protection
- The donor must have the ability to confidentially withdraw from consideration at any time without judgment 1
- Provide mechanism for donor to decline participation without family knowledge 2
- Address coercive pressures throughout the evaluation process, not just at initial assessment 2
Social Support Assessment
- Evaluate adequacy of postoperative support systems 2
- Assess financial stability and ability to take time off work 8
- Confirm understanding of required follow-up schedule 8
Phase 7: Informed Consent Process
Donor Risk Discussion
- Overall complication rate of approximately 11-17% 3
- Simple complications (wound issues, minor infections): 6-7% 3
- Moderate complications (bile leak, prolonged ileus): 4% 3
- Severe complications (organ failure, death): <1% 3
- Mortality risk: approximately 0.1-0.5% 1, 3
Long-Term Outcomes
- 88% of donors report feeling the same or better after donation 8
- Common physical complaints include malaise, bloating, and scar discomfort 8
- Emotional symptoms (fear and anxiety) occur in 27-29% but typically resolve spontaneously 8
- 93% of donors would recommend donation 8
- High satisfaction rates (61% very satisfied) 8
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not proceed without liver biopsy, even if imaging and laboratory tests are normal—50% of apparently healthy donors have abnormal pathology 5
- Do not accept donors with steatosis >30%, as this significantly increases risk of poor graft function 1
- Do not minimize psychosocial evaluation—coercion assessment is critical and must be ongoing throughout the process 1
- Do not proceed if donor remnant volume will be <30-35% of original liver volume 6
- Do not accept related donors for Alagille syndrome without genetic testing and careful evaluation for bile duct hypoplasia 2
- Do not rush evaluation in acute liver failure settings—emergent environments may be coercive to potential donors 2
- Do not rely solely on non-invasive imaging for biliary anatomy—MRCP should be performed 6
Rejection Criteria Summary
Approximately 68% of potential donors are rejected during evaluation 4. Common reasons include: