What is the evaluation checklist for a living liver donor?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 27, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Living Liver Donor Evaluation Checklist

Living liver donor evaluation requires a comprehensive, multi-phase assessment encompassing medical screening, anatomic imaging, liver biopsy, and mandatory independent psychosocial evaluation to ensure donor safety and graft suitability. 1

Ethical Prerequisites

Before initiating any evaluation, confirm these fundamental criteria are met:

  • Liver transplantation must be the only therapeutic option for the recipient, OR deceased donor transplantation is not available, OR a deceased donor organ has not become available 2
  • The likelihood of recipient survival following living donor liver transplantation must be high 2
  • The mortality risk to the donor must be low (generally <0.5%) 1
  • Donor safety is the absolute highest priority, as the donor undergoes major surgery for no personal medical benefit 1

Phase 1: Initial Screening

Relationship and Blood Type Compatibility

  • Verify donor-recipient relationship (related donors preferred, though non-related donors are acceptable at experienced centers) 2, 3
  • Confirm ABO blood group compatibility 4

Basic Medical Assessment

  • Complete history and physical examination focusing on:
    • Age (no absolute age limit, but older donors have increased risk) 2
    • Body mass index and obesity status 5
    • Cardiovascular disease history 2
    • Diabetes mellitus 2
    • Chronic medical conditions that increase surgical risk 2
    • Medication use 6
    • Substance use history (alcohol, tobacco, drugs) 2

Laboratory Evaluation

  • Complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, coagulation studies 6
  • Liver function tests (AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, albumin) 6
  • Renal function (creatinine, creatinine clearance) 2, 6
  • Fasting glucose and hemoglobin A1c 6
  • Lipid panel 6

Infectious Disease Screening

  • Hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis B core antibody, hepatitis B surface antibody 2, 6
  • Hepatitis C antibody and RNA if positive 2, 6
  • HIV antibody 2, 6
  • Cytomegalovirus IgG 2, 6
  • Epstein-Barr virus IgG 2, 6
  • Rapid plasma reagin (syphilis) 6

Phase 2: Anatomic and Volumetric Assessment

Cross-Sectional Imaging

  • CT angiography or MRI/MRCP to evaluate:
    • Hepatic arterial anatomy and variants 2, 6
    • Portal venous anatomy 2, 6
    • Hepatic venous drainage patterns 6
    • Biliary anatomy (MRCP preferred to avoid invasive cholangiography) 6
    • Liver volume measurement (donor remnant must be ≥30-35% of original liver volume) 6
    • Exclusion of hepatic masses or lesions 6

Volumetric Requirements

  • Calculate future liver remnant volume (must be adequate to prevent donor hepatic insufficiency) 6
  • Assess graft-to-recipient weight ratio (typically ≥0.8% for adequate recipient function) 6

Phase 3: Liver Biopsy Assessment

Liver biopsy should be part of the routine evaluation protocol for all living liver donors, as approximately 50% of apparently healthy donors have abnormal pathology 5

Biopsy Indications and Findings

  • Perform liver biopsy even when liver function tests are normal and imaging appears normal 5
  • Assess for steatosis: Macrovesicular steatosis >30% is generally a contraindication to donation, as it reduces functional graft mass and increases risk of poor graft function 1
  • Evaluate for occult liver disease: fibrosis, hepatitis, steatohepatitis, granulomatous reactions 5
  • Document percentage of steatosis, inflammation grade, and fibrosis stage 5

Specific Pathology Considerations

  • Steatosis 10-30% requires careful consideration and may be acceptable in select cases 4
  • Any fibrosis beyond minimal portal fibrosis should prompt reconsideration 5
  • Steatohepatitis is typically a contraindication 5

Phase 4: Cardiopulmonary Evaluation

Cardiac Assessment

  • Echocardiography to assess:

    • Left ventricular ejection fraction (must be >50%) 7
    • Valvular function 7
    • Left atrial size 7
    • Estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure 7
  • Dobutamine stress echocardiography for:

    • Chronic smokers 2
    • Donors over age 50 2
    • Those with clinical or family history of heart disease 2
    • Diabetic donors 2
  • Cardiac catheterization if stress test is positive 2

Pulmonary Assessment

  • Pulmonary function tests 2
  • Arterial blood gas if pulmonary disease suspected 2
  • Chest radiograph 6

Phase 5: Genetic and Metabolic Considerations

For recipients with inherited metabolic liver diseases, genetic testing of related donors is essential to exclude carrier states that could compromise graft function 1

Acceptable Heterozygote Donor Conditions

  • Crigler-Najjar syndrome type 1 2, 1
  • Wilson's disease 2, 1
  • Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency 2, 1
  • Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis 2, 1
  • Carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1 deficiency 2
  • Propionic acidemia 2
  • Arginosuccinic aciduria 2
  • Tyrosinemia 2

Special Considerations for Alagille Syndrome

  • If the potential donor and recipient share the same mutant Jagged 1 or Notch 2 allele, the donor must be carefully evaluated for bile duct hypoplasia and vascular anomalies 2
  • Donor evaluation must include liver biopsy and/or cholangiography to rule out bile duct hypoplasia 2
  • Living-related liver transplantation is not advisable in most circumstances when shared mutations exist 2

Phase 6: Mandatory Psychosocial Evaluation

Independent psychological assessment by a psychiatrist or psychologist is mandatory to ensure informed consent and absence of coercion 1

Key Assessment Components

  • Evaluation for external pressure from family members or social circumstances 1
  • Assessment for internal pressure or guilt-driven motivation 1
  • Confirmation of donor's understanding of risks, including:
    • Perioperative mortality risk 1
    • Morbidity and complication rates 1
    • Long-term health implications, including potential for hepatic insufficiency 1
    • Impact on future insurability and employment 8

Donor Autonomy Protection

  • The donor must have the ability to confidentially withdraw from consideration at any time without judgment 1
  • Provide mechanism for donor to decline participation without family knowledge 2
  • Address coercive pressures throughout the evaluation process, not just at initial assessment 2

Social Support Assessment

  • Evaluate adequacy of postoperative support systems 2
  • Assess financial stability and ability to take time off work 8
  • Confirm understanding of required follow-up schedule 8

Phase 7: Informed Consent Process

Donor Risk Discussion

  • Overall complication rate of approximately 11-17% 3
  • Simple complications (wound issues, minor infections): 6-7% 3
  • Moderate complications (bile leak, prolonged ileus): 4% 3
  • Severe complications (organ failure, death): <1% 3
  • Mortality risk: approximately 0.1-0.5% 1, 3

Long-Term Outcomes

  • 88% of donors report feeling the same or better after donation 8
  • Common physical complaints include malaise, bloating, and scar discomfort 8
  • Emotional symptoms (fear and anxiety) occur in 27-29% but typically resolve spontaneously 8
  • 93% of donors would recommend donation 8
  • High satisfaction rates (61% very satisfied) 8

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not proceed without liver biopsy, even if imaging and laboratory tests are normal—50% of apparently healthy donors have abnormal pathology 5
  • Do not accept donors with steatosis >30%, as this significantly increases risk of poor graft function 1
  • Do not minimize psychosocial evaluation—coercion assessment is critical and must be ongoing throughout the process 1
  • Do not proceed if donor remnant volume will be <30-35% of original liver volume 6
  • Do not accept related donors for Alagille syndrome without genetic testing and careful evaluation for bile duct hypoplasia 2
  • Do not rush evaluation in acute liver failure settings—emergent environments may be coercive to potential donors 2
  • Do not rely solely on non-invasive imaging for biliary anatomy—MRCP should be performed 6

Rejection Criteria Summary

Approximately 68% of potential donors are rejected during evaluation 4. Common reasons include:

  • Incompatible blood group 4
  • Steatosis >30% on liver biopsy 1, 4
  • Insufficient liver volume or inadequate remnant 4
  • Psychosocial concerns or evidence of coercion 4
  • Occult liver disease on biopsy 5
  • Significant cardiovascular disease 2
  • Active substance abuse 6
  • Transmissible infections 2

References

Guideline

Liver Donation Workup

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Our Living Donor Protocol for Liver Transplant: A SingleCenter Experience.

Experimental and clinical transplantation : official journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation, 2020

Research

[Evaluation of potential liver living donors. Logistic and financial aspects].

Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2003

Research

Value of an individual liver biopsy in the preoperative evaluation of apparently healthy potential liver donors.

Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society, 2008

Research

Evaluation of living liver donors.

Transplantation, 2003

Guideline

Liver Transplant Eligibility Criteria for Patients with Elevated RVSP and Severely Dilated Left Atrium

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Exploring the Effects of Living Liver Donation: Evidence from Argentina's First Single-Center Survey on Donor Quality of Life.

Experimental and clinical transplantation : official journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.