What is the recommended treatment for a patient with a history of fall and left side neck turning catching sensation, presenting with severe left foraminal narrowing and extruded disc material at the C5-6 level, as shown on the CT (Computed Tomography) cervical spine findings?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 27, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Severe Left Foraminal Narrowing with Extruded Disc at C5-6

This patient requires initial conservative management with structured physical therapy, NSAIDs, and activity modification for at least 6 weeks, followed by neurosurgical referral if symptoms persist or worsen, as 75-90% of cervical radiculopathy cases resolve with non-operative treatment. 1

Initial Conservative Management (First-Line Treatment)

Conservative therapy is the appropriate initial approach for most patients with cervical radiculopathy, even with severe foraminal narrowing on imaging. 1

  • Non-operative management achieves symptomatic improvement in 75-90% of patients with cervical radiculopathy 1
  • A minimum 6-week trial of structured conservative therapy is required before surgical intervention can be considered medically necessary 1
  • Conservative treatment should include:
    • Structured physical therapy with cervical-specific exercises 1
    • NSAIDs for pain and inflammation control 1
    • Activity modification to avoid provocative movements 1
    • Possible short-term cervical collar immobilization (though first aid providers should not routinely apply collars due to risks of increased intracranial pressure) 2

Advanced Imaging Requirements

MRI of the cervical spine is essential for definitive evaluation of this patient's extruded disc and foraminal stenosis. 2

  • CT alone is insufficient for excluding clinically significant soft-tissue pathology in patients with neurologic symptoms 2
  • MRI is the gold standard for assessing:
    • Disc herniation and extrusion 2
    • Nerve root compression 3
    • Spinal cord compression or contusion 2
    • Epidural hematoma (rare but serious complication of disc extrusion) 4
  • CT provides superior visualization of bony foraminal stenosis from facet and uncovertebral joint hypertrophy but misses soft-tissue pathology 2, 3

Critical Clinical Correlation Required

Imaging findings must correlate with clinical symptoms before attributing radiculopathy to degenerative changes, as asymptomatic cervical spondylosis is extremely common. 2, 3

  • Spondylotic changes on imaging are common in patients over 30 years and correlate poorly with neck pain 2
  • MRI demonstrates 100% sensitivity for cervical soft-tissue injuries but only 64-77% specificity 2
  • Clinical examination should document:
    • Dermatomal sensory changes in the C6 distribution (thumb and radial forearm) for C5-6 pathology 3
    • Motor weakness in C6 myotome (wrist extension, biceps) 1
    • Reflex changes (diminished biceps reflex) 1
    • Provocative maneuvers (Spurling's test) 3

Indications for Neurosurgical Referral

Neurosurgical consultation is warranted if conservative management fails after 6+ weeks or if progressive neurological deficits develop. 1

  • Absolute indications for urgent referral:

    • Progressive motor weakness 1
    • Signs of myelopathy (gait instability, fine motor deterioration, hyperreflexia) 1
    • Acute neurological deterioration (rare with disc extrusion causing epidural hematoma) 4
    • Bowel/bladder dysfunction 1
  • Relative indications after failed conservative therapy:

    • Persistent radicular pain impacting activities of daily living and sleep despite 6+ weeks of conservative treatment 1
    • Functional deficits significantly affecting quality of life 1
    • Documented correlation between symptoms and severe foraminal stenosis on MRI 5, 3

Surgical Options if Conservative Management Fails

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) provides 80-90% success rates for arm pain relief and is the preferred surgical approach for C5-6 disc pathology with foraminal stenosis. 1

  • ACDF outcomes:

    • 80-90% success rate for arm pain relief 1
    • 90.9% functional improvement 1
    • Motor function recovery maintained in 92.9% of patients over 12 months 1
    • More rapid relief (within 3-4 months) compared to continued conservative management 1
  • Alternative surgical approaches:

    • Posterior laminoforaminotomy for isolated lateral soft disc herniation 1
    • Success rates 78-95.5% depending on pathology 1
    • Preserves motion but requires going through posterior musculature 1
  • Anterior cervical plating (instrumentation) reduces pseudarthrosis risk and maintains cervical lordosis, particularly important for multilevel disease 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not proceed directly to surgery without documented conservative management, as this violates established guidelines and most patients improve without surgery. 1

  • Premature surgical intervention ignores the 75-90% success rate with conservative management 1

  • Performing surgery on imaging findings alone without clinical correlation leads to poor outcomes, as asymptomatic degenerative changes are ubiquitous 2, 3

  • Failure to obtain MRI in patients with neurologic symptoms risks missing:

    • Epidural hematoma (rare but serious complication of disc extrusion requiring emergent decompression) 4
    • Spinal cord compression 2
    • Nerve root avulsion 2
  • The straightening of cervical lordosis and mild C3-4 anterolisthesis noted on this CT are likely incidental findings unrelated to the patient's left-sided symptoms 2

  • Disc space narrowing alone causes 30-45% reduction in foraminal area with 3mm of narrowing, contributing to nerve root compression 6

Special Consideration: Extruded Disc Material

The "locule of gas" described at C5-6 represents extruded disc material, which can spontaneously resorb with conservative management but rarely causes epidural hematoma. 4, 7

  • Extruded disc fragments can resorb completely with conservative management, even with severe neurological deficit 7
  • Cervical epidural steroid injections may provide excellent outcomes even with profound motor deficits from disc extrusion 7
  • Extruded disc segments rarely precipitate venous epidural bleeding and acute cord compression, requiring emergent surgical decompression 4
  • Monitor closely for acute neurological deterioration during conservative management trial 4

References

Guideline

Cervical Radiculopathy Diagnosis and Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Cervical Degenerative Arthritis and Nerve Root Compression

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Neurosurgery Referral for Post-Fusion Adjacent Level Disease

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Cervical intervertebral disc space narrowing and size of intervertebral foramina.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2000

Research

Successful outcomes following transforaminal epidural steroid injections for C4/5 cervical disc prolapse associated with profound neurological deficit.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.