Periprosthetic Infection vs. Cellulitis: Critical Distinction
No, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is fundamentally different from cellulitis and must be distinguished immediately because PJI requires urgent surgical intervention and carries a fivefold increased mortality risk compared to aseptic complications. 1, 2
Key Distinguishing Features
Anatomic and Pathophysiologic Differences
- PJI involves deep infection of the joint space, prosthesis-bone interface, and periprosthetic tissues, often with biofilm formation on the implant surface that makes eradication extremely difficult 1
- Cellulitis is a superficial soft tissue infection limited to the skin and subcutaneous tissues without involvement of the joint space or prosthesis
- PJI requires definitive surgical management (debridement with prosthesis retention, one-stage exchange, or two-stage exchange), whereas cellulitis responds to antibiotics alone 1
Clinical Presentation Patterns
Acute PJI (within 3 months post-surgery):
- Pain, swelling, warmth, erythema, and fever are common—mimicking cellulitis superficially 1, 3
- However, night pain or pain at rest is characteristic of PJI, whereas cellulitis typically causes constant pain regardless of activity 1, 4
- Joint effusion and purulence surrounding the prosthesis distinguish PJI 1
Chronic/Low-grade PJI (>3 months post-surgery):
- May present with pain alone without fever, erythema, or warmth—easily mistaken for mechanical loosening rather than cellulitis 1, 4
- Pain persisting >6 months after joint replacement mandates infection exclusion 1
Diagnostic Algorithm to Differentiate
Step 1: Clinical Assessment
- Superficial erythema and warmth WITHOUT joint pain at rest suggests cellulitis
- Deep joint pain (especially at rest/night), joint effusion, or sinus tract indicates PJI 1, 4
Step 2: Laboratory Markers
- Obtain ESR, CRP, and interleukin-6 for all suspected cases 1, 4
- CRP >13.5 mg/L has 73-91% sensitivity for PJI (though can be elevated in cellulitis as well) 1, 4
- When ≥2 of 3 tests abnormal (CRP, ESR, fibrinogen), diagnostic accuracy reaches 93% sensitivity and 100% specificity for PJI 1, 4
- Peripheral WBC is NOT useful—normal in most PJI cases 1, 4
Step 3: Joint Aspiration (Critical Differentiator)
- Proceed immediately to joint aspiration if PJI suspected—this definitively distinguishes PJI from cellulitis 1, 4
- Withhold antibiotics for ≥2 weeks prior to aspiration if patient is stable to avoid false-negative cultures 1, 4
- Synovial fluid with >1700 cells/μL or >65% neutrophils indicates PJI (94-97% sensitivity) 1
- Alpha-defensin testing of synovial fluid has 97% sensitivity and 96% specificity for PJI 1
- Cellulitis does NOT produce purulent joint fluid or elevated synovial markers
Step 4: Imaging
- Radiographs first to assess for loosening, osteolysis, or periosteal reaction suggesting PJI 1, 4
- MRI can demonstrate deep inflammatory synovitis, bone marrow edema, and fluid collections characteristic of PJI but absent in superficial cellulitis 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never treat suspected PJI as cellulitis with antibiotics alone—this delays definitive surgical management and worsens outcomes 1
- Do not rely on absence of fever/erythema to exclude PJI—chronic infections frequently present with pain alone 1, 4
- Superficial wound erythema in a joint replacement patient requires joint aspiration to exclude PJI before assuming cellulitis 1, 4
- PJI increases one-year mortality by fivefold compared to aseptic complications—early recognition is life-saving 2
Microbiology Differences
- PJI organisms: Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (including S. epidermidis) are most common, with biofilm formation 1, 4
- Cellulitis organisms: Typically Streptococcus species or S. aureus without biofilm
- Multiple tissue cultures (3-6 samples) are required for PJI diagnosis, whereas cellulitis is diagnosed clinically 1