Is a patient with a 6mm length discrepancy between the right and left lower limbs, abnormal Medial Proximal Tibial Angle (MPTA) of 97 degrees on the right and 98 degrees on the left, and abnormal Lateral Distal Femoral Angle (LDFA) of 93 degrees on the right and 92 degrees on the left, a candidate for high tibial osteotomy and bone grafting?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 28, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

High Tibial Osteotomy Is NOT Indicated for These Findings

Based on the measurements provided, high tibial osteotomy and bone grafting are not indicated because the patient has essentially normal lower limb alignment without pathological varus deformity. The MPTA angles (97° right, 98° left) and LDFA angles (93° right, 92° left) fall within or very close to normal ranges, and the 6mm leg length discrepancy is clinically insignificant 1.

Why This Patient Does Not Meet Criteria for HTO

Normal Alignment Parameters

  • MPTA values of 97-98° are within normal range: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons defines pathological tibial deformity requiring correction as MPTA <85°, which would indicate significant tibial vara 2, 1.
  • LDFA values of 92-93° are normal: These measurements indicate no significant femoral deformity requiring correction 2.
  • No pathological varus malalignment exists: HTO is specifically indicated for patients with pathological varus malalignment (typically >5° varus on hip-knee-ankle angle measurement), which this patient does not demonstrate 1.

Leg Length Discrepancy Is Not Clinically Significant

  • 6mm difference is below the threshold for intervention: This minimal discrepancy (right 798mm vs left 804mm) does not warrant surgical correction and would not be addressed by HTO in any case 1.
  • HTO does not correct leg length discrepancy: The procedure is designed to correct angular deformity and shift weight-bearing load, not to equalize limb lengths 3.

Established Indications for HTO That Are Absent Here

Required Clinical Criteria Not Met

  • Symptomatic medial compartment osteoarthritis: HTO is indicated for patients with symptomatic medial compartment OA combined with pathological varus, typically in active patients under 60-65 years 1, 3.
  • Pathological varus deformity: The goal of HTO is to correct pathological varus (typically >5° varus) to 3-8° of valgus, shifting load from diseased medial to healthier lateral compartment 1.
  • Intact lateral compartment: The procedure requires a relatively preserved lateral compartment to accept the transferred load 1.

Risk of Iatrogenic Deformity

  • Creating HTO in normal alignment causes harm: Performing HTO on patients with normal or near-normal alignment creates iatrogenic valgus deformity, leading to lateral compartment overload, pain, and accelerated lateral compartment arthritis 1.
  • No therapeutic benefit without pathological deformity: Without pre-existing pathological varus and medial compartment disease, the procedure offers no clinical benefit 1, 3.

When Double-Level Osteotomy Would Be Considered

Specific Deformity Patterns Requiring Combined Correction

  • MPTA <85° combined with abnormal LDFA: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons recommends double-level osteotomy only when both MPTA <85° and LDFA considerations exist to avoid excessive tibial valgus and joint line obliquity 2.
  • This patient's measurements do not approach these thresholds: With MPTA 97-98° and LDFA 92-93°, neither tibial nor femoral correction is warranted 2.

Appropriate Clinical Algorithm

What These Measurements Actually Indicate

  • Evaluate for symptomatic pathology: If the patient has knee pain, investigate for intra-articular pathology (meniscal tears, cartilage lesions, ligamentous injury) rather than assuming alignment-related disease 1.
  • Standing full-length radiographs needed: Obtain standing hip-to-ankle radiographs to measure actual mechanical axis and hip-knee-ankle angle if clinical symptoms warrant further evaluation 1.
  • Conservative management first: If osteoarthritis is present, trial physical therapy, weight optimization, and anti-inflammatory measures before considering any surgical intervention 1.

Common Pitfall to Avoid

  • Do not perform HTO based on isolated angle measurements without clinical correlation: The measurements provided show normal alignment; performing osteotomy would create pathology rather than correct it 1.
  • Recognize that minor variations in MPTA and LDFA are normal: Population studies show variation in these angles, and values in the 90-98° range for MPTA and 88-93° range for LDFA are within normal limits 2, 1.

References

Guideline

Tibial Shaft Osteotomy in TKR for Tibial Vara

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Surgical Recommendations for High Tibial Osteotomy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

High tibial osteotomy.

Knee surgery & related research, 2012

Related Questions

Is a unilateral partial osteotomy high tibial osteotomy with bone graft indicated for a patient with a left Medial Proximal Tibial Angle (MPTA) of 85 degrees and a Lateral Distal Femoral Angle (LDFA) of 93.7 degrees?
Are LDFA and MPTA measurements of 87/89 and 83/84 respectively justified for high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and bone graft?
Is a high tibial osteotomy with bone graft indicated for a patient with a mild varus deformity, given a Lateral Distal Femoral Angle (L DFA) of 87 degrees and a Medial Proximal Tibial Angle (M PTA) of 86.5 degrees?
Are MPTA (Medial Proximal Tibial Angle) values of 83 and 84 indicative for high tibial osteotomy and bone graft?
Is a high tibial osteotomy (HTO) with bone graft indicated for a patient with a right lower limb medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) of 79.6 degrees and a lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) of 87.1 degrees?
What is the next step in managing a patient with elevated Triiodothyronine (T3), Thyroxine (T4), and Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH) levels, potentially indicating a thyroid disorder?
What is the most common cause of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in hospitalized patients?
What is the fluid of choice for an infant with congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (CHPS)?
Is a patient with a 6mm limb length discrepancy, where the left lower limb is longer than the right, and normal Mechanical Axis of the Proximal Tibia (MPTA) and Lateral Distal Femoral Angle (LDFA) angles, a candidate for high tibial osteotomy and bone graft?
What is the preferred marker, C-Reactive Protein (CRP) or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), for monitoring disease activity in an older adult with rheumatoid arthritis and a history of osteoporosis and recent vertebral wedge fracture during a flare?
Is a high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and bone graft indicated for a patient with a left leg length discrepancy of 6mm, normal Medial Proximal Tibial Angle (MPTA) of 98 degrees, and normal Lateral Distal Femoral Angle (LDFA) of 92 degrees?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.