Does chickenpox result in lowering the total White Blood Cell (WBC) count and lymphocytes count, especially in immunocompromised patients?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 28, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Does Chickenpox Result in Lowering Total WBC and Lymphocyte Counts?

Chickenpox does not typically cause a decrease in total WBC count or lymphocyte count in immunocompetent patients; however, immunocompromised patients may present with abnormal or acellular blood counts despite active infection, making normal or low WBC counts unreliable for excluding severe disease in this population.

Hematologic Findings in Immunocompetent Patients

  • In otherwise healthy individuals with chickenpox, the total WBC count and lymphocyte count typically remain within normal ranges or may show mild elevation as part of the immune response 1.
  • A study of 320 chickenpox patients found no statistically significant correlation between disease severity (measured by number of skin lesions) and WBC count (p = 0.231), indicating that WBC changes are not a consistent feature of varicella infection 1.
  • The immune response in uncomplicated chickenpox is characterized by cytokine production (TNF-alpha and IL-6) from mononuclear cells rather than significant changes in total WBC or lymphocyte counts 1.

Critical Differences in Immunocompromised Patients

Immunocompromised patients with chickenpox may paradoxically present with normal, low, or acellular blood counts despite severe infection, making laboratory values unreliable indicators of disease severity.

  • In severely immunocompromised patients with encephalitis or CNS infections (including VZV), the CSF is more likely to be acellular even during active infection, and this principle extends to peripheral blood counts 2.
  • CSF and blood investigations for microbial pathogens should be performed in immunocompromised patients regardless of cell count, as normal or low counts do not exclude serious infection 2.
  • Immunocompromised patients have impaired inflammatory and immune responses, resulting in absent or diminished cellular responses that would normally elevate WBC counts 2.

Specific Immunocompromised Populations at Risk

  • HIV-infected patients with CD4 counts <200 cells/mm³ are at highest risk for severe VZV complications and may not mount typical leukocyte responses 2.
  • Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy (including purine analogs like cladribine and pentostatin) experience profound and prolonged lymphocytopenia that may persist for over a year, making them particularly vulnerable to severe VZV infection 2.
  • Bone marrow transplant recipients show high rates of VZV reactivation (36% clinical herpes zoster, 26% subclinical reactivation) and have impaired lymphocyte proliferation responses 3.
  • Patients with congenital nephrotic syndrome receiving IVIG infusions have unreliable antibody titers and altered immune responses to VZV 2.

Predictors of Severe Disease

Low levels of immune mediators, rather than WBC count changes, are the most reliable predictors of severe or complicated chickenpox.

  • Patients with severe chickenpox (>100 skin lesions) demonstrate significantly decreased TNF-alpha-producing mononuclear cells (p = 0.003) and borderline decreased IL-6-producing cells (p = 0.058) compared to those with moderate disease 1.
  • Complications such as secondary viral-bacterial pneumonia can be predicted by insufficiently elevated (less than double-normal) levels of IL-6, IFN-γ, induced chemiluminescence, CD16, and CD20, indicating immune deficiency with suppressed T-effector and phagocytic mechanisms 4.
  • Patients with positive VZV DNA have significantly lower IFN-α and IFN-γ levels compared to those with negative DNA results, indicating impaired antiviral immune response 4.

Clinical Management Implications

  • Diagnosis of VZV infection in immunocompromised patients should rely on clinical features and PCR detection of virus in vesicle samples, not on WBC counts or antibody titers 2.
  • Susceptible immunocompromised patients (those with hypogammaglobulinemia without VZV immunity) exposed to chickenpox should receive VZV immunoglobulins (VZIGs) as soon as possible, or prophylactic oral acyclovir (10 mg/kg four times daily for 7 days) within 7-10 days of exposure 2.
  • Confirmed VZV infection in immunocompromised patients requires treatment with intravenous high-dose acyclovir (10 mg/kg three times daily) for 7-10 days, extended to at least 21 days in HIV patients with CD4 <200 cells/mm³ 2, 5.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely on normal WBC or lymphocyte counts to exclude severe chickenpox in immunocompromised patients—these patients may have acellular or normal counts despite life-threatening infection 2.
  • Do not assume elevated WBC indicates bacterial superinfection without left shift—total WBC ≥14,000 cells/mm³ alone has only a likelihood ratio of 3.7 for bacterial infection and requires ≥16% band neutrophils or absolute band count ≥1,500 cells/mm³ for clinical significance 6.
  • Do not wait for laboratory confirmation before initiating antiviral therapy in immunocompromised patients with suspected VZV—clinical diagnosis with immediate treatment is essential to prevent complications 2, 7.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Headaches After Shingles

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Transient Rise in White Blood Cell Count: Causes and Treatment Indications

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Chickenpox in adults - clinical management.

The Journal of infection, 2008

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.