What are the different types of shock that a critically ill adult with severe hypotension or septic shock may develop?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 28, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Types of Shock in Critically Ill Adults

Critically ill adults can develop four main categories of shock: distributive (including septic shock), hypovolemic, cardiogenic, and obstructive shock, with distributive/septic shock being by far the most common type encountered in intensive care settings. 1, 2, 3

Classification of Shock States

Distributive Shock

  • Septic shock is the most prevalent form of distributive shock and the most common shock state overall in critically ill patients 1, 3
  • Defined as persistent hypotension (MAP <65 mmHg or SBP <90 mmHg) despite adequate fluid resuscitation (at least 30 mL/kg of crystalloids) in the presence of documented or suspected infection 4, 5
  • Characterized by profound vasodilation with low systemic vascular resistance, resulting in inadequate tissue perfusion despite often normal or elevated cardiac output 2
  • Other causes of distributive shock include anaphylaxis, neurogenic shock, and toxic shock syndrome 4, 1

Hypovolemic Shock

  • Results from acute reduction in intravascular volume due to hemorrhage, severe dehydration, or fluid losses 2, 3
  • Characterized by decreased preload, low cardiac output, and compensatory vasoconstriction 1, 2
  • Responds to volume replacement as the primary therapeutic intervention 3

Cardiogenic Shock

  • Caused by primary myocardial dysfunction with inability to maintain adequate cardiac output 1, 2
  • Results from acute myocardial infarction, severe heart failure, arrhythmias, or valvular emergencies 3
  • Characterized by elevated filling pressures (CVP), low cardiac output, and elevated systemic vascular resistance 1, 2
  • Requires inotropic support and cautious fluid management to avoid pulmonary edema 3

Obstructive Shock

  • Caused by mechanical obstruction to cardiac output despite adequate intravascular volume and myocardial function 1, 2
  • Common causes include massive pulmonary embolism, tension pneumothorax, cardiac tamponade, and severe intra-abdominal hypertension 4, 1
  • Requires immediate intervention to relieve the mechanical obstruction 2, 3

Pathophysiologic Mechanisms

Common Final Pathway

  • All shock states result in acute widespread reduction in effective tissue perfusion 2
  • This creates an imbalance between oxygen supply and demand, leading to anaerobic metabolism and lactic acidosis 2
  • Prolonged shock causes cellular and organ dysfunction, metabolic abnormalities, and if untreated, irreversible damage and death 2

Hemodynamic Distinctions

  • Shock results from changes in one or combination of: intravascular volume, myocardial function, systemic vascular resistance, or distribution of blood flow 2
  • Septic shock specifically involves profound vasodilation (low diastolic blood pressure ≤40 mmHg or diastolic shock index ≥3), increased capillary permeability, and often myocardial depression in 10-20% of cases 4, 6
  • Hypovolemic and cardiogenic shock both present with low cardiac output but differ in filling pressures (low vs. high CVP respectively) 1, 2

Clinical Recognition

Critical Diagnostic Thresholds for Septic Shock

  • SBP <90 mmHg or reduction ≥40 mmHg from baseline 5
  • MAP <65 mmHg despite initial fluid resuscitation of 30 mL/kg crystalloids 4, 5
  • Heart rate ≥90 bpm with signs of tissue hypoperfusion 5
  • Lactate ≥1 mmol/L (some recommend >2 mmol/L cutoff for defining shock) 5
  • Oliguria ≤0.5 mL/kg/h for at least 2 hours despite adequate fluids 5
  • Altered mental status, confusion, or apathy 5
  • Reduced capillary refill or skin mottling indicating peripheral vasoconstriction 5

Differentiating Shock Types

  • Point-of-care ultrasound helps evaluate undifferentiated shock and determine fluid responsiveness 3
  • Clinical history, physical examination, and hemodynamic monitoring are essential to differentiate shock states 1
  • Critical pitfall: One shock state may convert to another (e.g., septic shock developing cardiogenic component), requiring continual reassessment 1

Management Implications by Shock Type

Septic/Distributive Shock

  • Norepinephrine is the first-choice vasopressor, targeting MAP ≥65 mmHg 4, 7, 5
  • Early vasopressor initiation (within first hour) may reduce mortality and fluid overload, particularly when diastolic BP ≤40 mmHg or diastolic shock index ≥3 7, 6, 8
  • Add vasopressin 0.03 units/min when norepinephrine requirements are moderate-to-high 4, 7
  • Hydrocortisone 200 mg/day when hemodynamic stability cannot be achieved with fluids and vasopressors 4, 7, 5

Hypovolemic Shock

  • Aggressive fluid resuscitation is the primary intervention 3
  • Vasopressors are generally not indicated until volume is restored 2

Cardiogenic Shock

  • Inotropic support (dobutamine) for persistent hypoperfusion with low cardiac output 4, 7
  • Norepinephrine may be required in profound cardiogenic shock with severe hypotension 3
  • Cautious fluid administration to avoid worsening pulmonary edema 3

Obstructive Shock

  • Immediate intervention to relieve mechanical obstruction (needle decompression for tension pneumothorax, pericardiocentesis for tamponade, thrombolysis/embolectomy for massive PE) 4, 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not delay vasopressor initiation in septic shock patients with profound hypotension (diastolic BP ≤40 mmHg) while waiting for additional fluid boluses 7, 6, 8
  • Do not continue aggressive fluid resuscitation when CVP is already elevated (≥13 mmHg), as this risks pulmonary edema without improving perfusion 7
  • Do not use dopamine as first-line therapy in septic shock; reserve only for highly selected patients with bradycardia and low arrhythmia risk 4, 7
  • Do not assume a single shock mechanism—patients may have mixed shock states requiring continual reassessment 1
  • Do not abruptly stop hydrocortisone once started, as this can cause hemodynamic deterioration and rebound inflammation 5

References

Research

Pathophysiology of shock.

Critical care nursing clinics of North America, 1990

Research

Circulatory shock in adults in emergency department.

Turkish journal of emergency medicine, 2023

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Sepsis and Septic Shock Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Management of Refractory Septic Shock with DKA

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Fluids and Early Vasopressors in the Management of Septic Shock: Do We Have the Right Answers Yet?

Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures), 2023

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.