Workup for Renal Artery Stenosis
Begin with duplex ultrasound (DUS) as your first-line imaging test, measuring peak systolic velocity (PSV), renal-aortic ratio (RAR), resistance index, and kidney size. 1, 2
Initial Diagnostic Imaging Algorithm
Perform DUS first in all patients with suspected renal artery stenosis, looking for PSV ≥200 cm/s (indicating >50% stenosis) or RAR >3.5 (indicating ≥60% stenosis). 1, 2
If DUS suggests stenosis or provides inconclusive results, proceed immediately to CT angiography (CTA) or MR angiography (MRA) for definitive anatomic assessment. 1, 2
For patients already on dialysis with impaired renal function, CTA may be preferred over MRA to avoid gadolinium-associated risks, though contrast load must be considered. 2
Determining Hemodynamic Significance
Once anatomic stenosis is identified, assess whether it is hemodynamically significant:
A stenosis ≥70% by visual estimation or intravascular ultrasound is considered hemodynamically significant. 3, 2
A stenosis of 50-69% is significant if accompanied by post-stenotic dilatation and/or significant trans-stenotic pressure gradient (resting mean gradient >10 mmHg, systolic hyperemic gradient >20 mmHg, or renal Pd/Pa ≤0.9). 1, 3, 2
If non-invasive imaging is equivocal, catheter-based angiography with pressure measurements may be needed to confirm hemodynamic significance. 1
Assessing Kidney Viability
This step is critical because non-viable kidneys will not benefit from revascularization, regardless of stenosis severity. 1, 2
Signs of Kidney Viability:
- Kidney size >8 cm 1, 2
- Distinct cortex >0.5 cm with preserved corticomedullary differentiation 1, 2
- Albumin-creatinine ratio <20 mg/mmol 1, 2
- Renal resistance index <0.8 1, 2
Signs of Non-Viability (revascularization contraindicated):
- Kidney size <7 cm 1
- Loss of corticomedullary differentiation 1
- Albumin-creatinine ratio >30 mg/mmol 1
- Renal resistance index >0.8 1
Identifying High-Risk Clinical Features
Revascularization should only be considered when high-risk features are present alongside anatomically significant stenosis and viable kidneys. 1, 3, 2
High-risk features include:
- Flash pulmonary edema (recurrent episodes despite medical therapy) 1, 3, 2
- Resistant hypertension (uncontrolled on ≥3 antihypertensive medications at maximal doses, including a diuretic) 1, 3, 4
- Rapidly declining renal function or progressive chronic kidney disease 1, 3, 2
- Bilateral renal artery stenosis >70% or stenosis in a solitary functioning kidney 1, 3
Management Approach
For Patients on Dialysis:
In patients already on dialysis, the primary goal shifts from preserving renal function to controlling blood pressure and preventing cardiovascular complications. 4
Optimize medical therapy first with renin-angiotensin system blocker (if tolerated), high-intensity statin, low-dose aspirin, and additional antihypertensive agents targeting BP <130/80 mmHg. 2, 4
Revascularization should be considered (Class IIa) only if the patient has viable kidneys, hemodynamically significant stenosis (>70%), and high-risk features such as flash pulmonary edema or truly resistant hypertension despite optimal medical therapy. 1, 3
For dialysis-dependent patients, the benefit of revascularization is controversial, but may be considered if there is potential for dialysis independence with bilateral disease or solitary kidney with signs of viability. 3
Medical Therapy Requirements:
Medical therapy is the Class I recommendation and must be established before any consideration of revascularization. 3, 2, 4
- Use three appropriate blood pressure medications at maximally tolerated doses, with one being a diuretic. 3
- Include a renin-angiotensin system blocker (ACE inhibitor or ARB), which confers long-term mortality benefit even in patients with identified renal artery stenosis. 1, 4
- Add high-intensity statin and low-dose aspirin. 2, 4
When to Consider Revascularization:
Revascularization should be considered (Class IIa) only when BOTH clinical AND anatomic criteria are met: 3, 2
Clinical criteria:
- Optimal medical therapy has been established and failed 3, 2
- Presence of high-risk features (flash pulmonary edema, resistant hypertension, progressive renal failure) 1, 3, 2
Anatomic criteria:
- Unilateral stenosis >70% OR bilateral stenosis >70% OR stenosis in solitary kidney 1, 3
- Signs of kidney viability present 1, 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not proceed to revascularization without first optimizing medical therapy – this is the most common error and violates Class I recommendations. 3, 2, 4
Do not assume all stenoses require intervention – routine revascularization for atherosclerotic RAS without high-risk features is Class III (not recommended). 1
Do not overlook kidney viability assessment – revascularizing a non-viable kidney (size <7 cm, resistance index >0.8, significant proteinuria) will not improve outcomes. 1, 2, 4
A rise in serum creatinine during ACE inhibitor/ARB therapy is often transient and related to hemodynamic changes when BP falls; this does not automatically indicate need for revascularization. 1, 4
For patients on dialysis, carefully weigh whether revascularization will meaningfully impact mortality or quality of life, as the primary renal preservation benefit may be limited. 3
Post-Intervention Surveillance
If revascularization is performed, follow-up with renal DUS is recommended: 1, 3, 2
Re-intervention may be considered for in-stent restenosis ≥60% detected by DUS, recurrent symptoms (diastolic BP >90 mmHg on >3 antihypertensive drugs), or >20% increase in serum creatinine. 1, 2