What is the role of robotics in pulmonary rehabilitation for older adult patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and comorbid conditions such as heart disease, diabetes, and hypertension, according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) statement?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 29, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

ATS/ERS Statement on Robotics in COPD Pulmonary Rehabilitation

The 2013 ATS/ERS statement acknowledges that technologies are "currently being adapted and tested" to support pulmonary rehabilitation but does not provide specific recommendations for robotics, as the evidence base remains insufficient compared to traditional rehabilitation approaches. 1

Current Status of Robotic Applications

The ATS/ERS recognizes that technologies are being developed to support exercise training, education, exacerbation management, and physical activity monitoring in pulmonary rehabilitation contexts, but these remain investigational rather than established interventions. 1 The statement emphasizes that pulmonary rehabilitation should remain a comprehensive intervention based on thorough patient assessment followed by patient-tailored therapies including exercise training, education, and behavior change. 1

Evidence-Based Alternatives to Robotics

For COPD patients with comorbidities like heart disease, diabetes, and hypertension, the ATS/ERS strongly endorses proven rehabilitation modalities rather than experimental robotic approaches:

  • Interval training, strength training, upper limb training, and transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation have established efficacy and should be prioritized over unproven robotic interventions. 1

  • Home-based exercise training that is appropriately resourced has proven effective in reducing dyspnea and increasing exercise performance, offering a practical alternative when center-based programs are inaccessible. 1

  • Technology-assisted telerehabilitation can remotely monitor home-based programs with good compliance and significant clinical improvements, representing a more evidence-based technological approach than robotics. 2, 3

When Technology May Be Considered

Technology-assisted approaches (not specifically robotics) may be deployed for patients who cannot access center-based programs due to transportation barriers, rural location, or mobility limitations. 3 However, any technology must deliver all core components of pulmonary rehabilitation—exercise training, education, behavioral support, and nutritional assessment—not just exercise monitoring. 3

Critical Limitations for Older Adults with Comorbidities

Comorbidities significantly impact rehabilitation outcomes, making unproven robotic interventions particularly risky in this population:

  • Metabolic diseases (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia) reduce the probability of improving exercise tolerance (OR 0.57,95% CI 0.49-0.67). 4

  • Heart diseases reduce the probability of improving quality of life (OR 0.67,95% CI 0.55-0.83). 4

  • The Charlson comorbidity index inversely correlates with rehabilitation success (OR 0.72 for exercise capacity, OR 0.51 for quality of life). 4

These findings underscore that older adults with multiple comorbidities require proven, comprehensive rehabilitation approaches rather than experimental robotic interventions.

Recommended Approach for Complex Patients

Integrated care principles should guide management of COPD patients with comorbidities, with pulmonary rehabilitation as a core component using established modalities. 1 The rehabilitation program should include:

  • Lower and upper extremity exercise training at appropriate intensity 2
  • Strength training combined with endurance training 2
  • Programs lasting 6-12 weeks, with longer durations producing greater sustained benefits 2
  • Maintenance strategies following initial rehabilitation 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not substitute experimental robotic technology for comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation that includes all core components—exercise training, education, behavioral support, and nutritional assessment. 3

  • Avoid using technology as standalone intervention without the multidisciplinary team approach that addresses the complex needs of patients with COPD and multiple comorbidities. 1

  • Do not assume technology improves outcomes simply because it is novel; the ATS/ERS emphasizes that technologies are still being tested and lack the robust evidence base of traditional approaches. 1, 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Pulmonary Rehabilitation for COPD Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Robotic Applications in Pulmonary Rehabilitation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.