Neck Vessel MR Angiography Protocol
Recommended Protocol for Patients with Potential Vascular Disease and Impaired Renal Function
For patients with impaired renal function (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m²), use non-contrast MRA techniques to avoid gadolinium-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis risk while maintaining diagnostic accuracy for neck vessel evaluation. 1
Technical Specifications
Scanner and Coil Requirements
- Use 1.5T or preferably 3.0T MRI scanner with minimum 16-channel head and neck coil 2
- 3.0T provides superior signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution for vessel visualization 3
Sequence Protocol Based on Renal Function
For Patients with Normal Renal Function (eGFR >45 mL/min/1.73 m²):
- Contrast-enhanced MRA is the preferred approach 2
- T1-weighted, fat-suppressed, contrast-enhanced black blood imaging (e.g., navigated 3D Turbo Spin Echo) 2
- Spatial resolution: 1.2×1.3×2 mm³
- Coronal acquisition from carotid bifurcation to abdominal arteries, including axillary and brachial arteries
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced technique: Fast SPGR sequences acquired 13 seconds after contrast injection 4
- TE: 1 ms, TR: 8 ms, flip angle: 60°
- Matrix: 256×128, slice thickness: 1 mm
- Acquisition time: 32 seconds
- Contrast dose: 0.2 mmol/kg at 1.5 mL/s injection rate 4
For Patients with Impaired Renal Function (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m²):
- Non-contrast MRA techniques are mandatory 1
- Time-of-flight (TOF) MRA is sufficiently sensitive for screening culprit lesions 1
- Alternative non-contrast sequences include:
Coverage and Anatomic Extent
- From carotid bifurcation to intracranial internal carotid arteries 2, 4
- Include vertebral arteries throughout their course 2
- Coronal acquisition to include axillary and brachial arteries when evaluating for large vessel vasculitis 2
Critical Technical Pitfalls and Solutions
For Non-Contrast MRA:
- TOF sequences overestimate stenosis severity, particularly in high-grade stenosis, compared to contrast-enhanced studies 1
- Metallic surgical clips cause signal loss artifacts that falsely suggest stenosis 1
- Cardiac arrhythmia impairs image quality with newer non-contrast techniques 2
- Flow artifacts are less problematic with contrast-enhanced dynamic MRA compared to conventional MRA 4
For Contrast-Enhanced MRA:
- Gadolinium has lower nephrotoxicity risk than iodinated contrast in moderate renal impairment 1
- Avoid gadolinium when eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m² due to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis risk 1
Post-Processing Requirements
- Maximum intensity projection (MIP) and targeted MIP algorithms for angiographic reconstruction 4
- Multiplanar reformatted images to optimize vessel visualization 2
Alternative Imaging Considerations
When MRA Cannot Be Performed:
- CTA neck with IV contrast is an alternative but requires careful risk-benefit assessment in renal impairment 1
- Ultrasound duplex Doppler serves as excellent first-line screening but has limitations in zones I and III 2, 6
- Sensitivity and specificity for stenosis >50% are approximately 90-95% with duplex ultrasound 2
Comparative Performance:
- MRA sensitivity and specificity for stenosis >50% are 90-100%, superior to catheter angiography 2
- Non-contrast MRA maintains acceptable diagnostic accuracy comparable to contrast-enhanced studies 1
- SSFP MRA demonstrates sensitivity 78-90%, specificity 91-94%, and negative predictive value 96-98% 1
Clinical Decision Algorithm
- Check eGFR before scheduling
- If eGFR >45 mL/min/1.73 m²: Use contrast-enhanced MRA protocol with gadolinium 1
- If eGFR 30-45 mL/min/1.73 m²: Consider non-contrast MRA first; gadolinium use requires careful risk-benefit assessment 1
- If eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m²: Use non-contrast MRA techniques exclusively 1
- If MRA contraindicated (pacemaker, metallic implants): Consider CTA with nephroprotective measures or ultrasound duplex 2