What are the pros and cons of using menstrual cups for individuals with various medical conditions, including heavy menstrual bleeding, uterine abnormalities, and a history of toxic shock syndrome?

Menstrual Cups: Comprehensive Analysis of Benefits and Risks

Advantages of Menstrual Cups

Menstrual cups are safe, cost-effective, and environmentally sustainable alternatives to disposable menstrual products, with comparable or superior leakage protection and no adverse effects on vaginal flora. 1

Safety Profile

• No significant health risks identified in postmarketing surveillance of over 100 million units, with preclinical testing showing no toxicity or mutagenicity 2
• Vaginal flora remains unaffected by menstrual cup use across multiple studies (507 women evaluated) 1
• Lower or equivalent leakage rates compared to disposable pads or tampons in direct comparison studies 1

Economic and Environmental Benefits

• Substantial cost savings with prices ranging $0.72-$46.72 (median $23.30) for reusable devices versus ongoing costs of disposables 1
• Single-size design eliminates fitting requirements for most vaginal cup models, allowing use without medical services 2
• Environmental sustainability through reduced waste generation compared to single-use products 1

User Acceptability

• 73% of users wished to continue menstrual cup use at study completion (pooled estimate from 13 studies, n=1144) 1
• 37% rated cups as better than traditional products after three cycles, particularly for comfort, dryness, and reduced odor 2
• 81% successfully inserted and removed their first cup using only written instructions 2

Unique Functional Advantage

• Can be worn during intercourse with certain designs (Softcup), unlike tampons or pads 2

---

Disadvantages and Risks of Menstrual Cups

Learning Curve and Initial Difficulties

• 54% experienced leakage during first cycle of use, though this decreases with subsequent cycles 3
• 45% unable to remove cup on first attempt, with 17% requiring assistance and this representing a higher rate than clinical trials 3
• Familiarization phase required over several menstrual cycles for successful adoption 1
• 29% discontinued use in real-world settings, citing cramping (1%), leakage (1%), and improper fit (3%) 2, 3

Serious Adverse Events

Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS)

• Five confirmed cases of TSS reported with menstrual cup use, including documented Staphylococcus aureus-mediated cases 1, 4
• TSS can occur even with first-time menstrual cup use 4
• This represents a contraindication for individuals with history of toxic shock syndrome 1

Urinary Tract Complications

• Nine reports of urinary tract complaints, including three cases of hydronephrosis from extrinsic ureteral compression 1, 5
• Renal colic can occur when cups occupy more than one-third of the pelvis minor diameter, causing ureteral obstruction 5
• Pain may be difficult to manage with conventional analgesics and requires device removal 5

IUD Displacement

• 13 women experienced IUD dislodgement during menstrual cup removal, occurring between 1 week and 13 months post-IUD insertion 1
• 2% of users in real-world settings reported IUD displacement during cup removal 3
• This represents a significant risk for individuals using intrauterine contraception concurrently

Other Physical Complications

• Five women reported severe pain or vaginal wounds 1
• Six reports of allergies or rashes to cup materials 1
• 47 cervical cup users and 2 vaginal cup users required professional assistance for removal 1

Specific Contraindications Based on Medical Conditions

Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

• Menstrual cups are collection devices only, not therapeutic for heavy bleeding 6
• Unlike levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs which treat menorrhagia, cups merely contain blood without reducing flow 6

Uterine Abnormalities

• Any structural abnormality distorting the uterine cavity may interfere with proper cup positioning and increase expulsion risk 6
• Fibroids increase device displacement rates substantially (11% vs 0-3% without fibroids) 6

Real-World Performance Gap

• Difficulties are more common in real-world use than reported in clinical trials, suggesting selection bias in research populations 3
• 25% reported pain or discomfort with cup in place during first cycle 3

User Education Deficits

• Only 50% of users were aware that different cup models may offer better fit for different individuals prior to first use 3
• Lack of this knowledge increased odds of needing removal assistance (adjusted OR 0.57,95% CI 0.35-0.94) and discontinuation (adjusted RRR 0.66,95% CI 0.44-1.00) 3
• Peer support improves uptake but is not systematically provided 1

---

Critical Clinical Considerations

When to Avoid Menstrual Cups

• History of toxic shock syndrome (absolute contraindication) 1, 4
• Current IUD users should be counseled about 2% displacement risk and consider alternative menstrual management 3, 1
• Uterine structural abnormalities including significant fibroids or congenital malformations 6
• History of urinary tract obstruction or anatomical predisposition to ureteral compression 5

Essential Patient Counseling Points

• Expect a 3-6 month learning period with initial difficulties in insertion, removal, and leakage 3, 1
• Different cup sizes and models exist; first choice may not be optimal fit 3
• Seek peer support or instructional resources to improve success rates 1
• Remove immediately if severe pain, inability to remove, or urinary symptoms develop 1, 5
• TSS symptoms (fever, rash, hypotension) require immediate medical attention 4