What is masking in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and how does it impact diagnosis using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5 (DSM 5) criteria?

Understanding Masking in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Its Impact on DSM-5 Diagnosis

What is Masking in ASD?

Masking (also called camouflaging) is the conscious or unconscious suppression of natural autistic behaviors and adoption of neurotypical-appearing alternatives to avoid stigma and "fit in" socially, which can lead to exhaustion, delayed diagnosis, and severe mental health consequences. 1

Core Components of Masking

Masking encompasses three distinct behavioral domains:

• Assimilation: Suppressing natural autistic responses and reactions to appear more neurotypical 2
• Compensation: Using deliberate strategies where observed behavior appears considerably better than underlying ability, creating a mismatch between external presentation and internal experience 3, 4
• Masking behaviors: Specific actions like forcing eye contact despite discomfort, limiting discussion of special interests, and mimicking neurotypical social behaviors 1, 3

Who Masks and Why

The phenomenon is not gender-specific, though patterns differ:

• Females with ASD report significantly higher masking across all three domains (Assimilation, Compensation, and Masking) compared to males 2
• Gender diverse individuals show elevated Compensation behaviors compared to cisgender individuals 2
• Masking occurs as an unsurprising response to autism stigma and the deficit narrative surrounding autism in neurotypical-dominated societies 3
• The primary driver is society's lack of awareness and acceptance of autism, not an inherent "female autism phenotype" 1, 3

Mental Health Consequences

The time spent masking—not masking itself—causes the most damage:

• Masking is associated with exhaustion, isolation, poor mental and physical health, loss of identity, higher depression and anxiety symptoms, lower self-esteem, lower authenticity, and increased suicidality 1, 5
• Higher masking behaviors correlate with greater past interpersonal trauma 5
• Autistic adults describe masking as "devastating" to mental health and well-being, though some view it as necessary protection from harm in social spaces 1

---

How Masking Leads to Diagnostic Challenges with DSM-5 Criteria

The Diagnostic Paradox

The DSM-5 explicitly acknowledges that ASD symptoms "may be masked by learned strategies in later life," yet this creates a fundamental diagnostic barrier because clinicians rely on observable behaviors that masking specifically conceals. 6

Specific DSM-5 Criteria Affected by Masking

The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry requires persistent deficits across multiple domains, all of which can be masked 6:

• Social-emotional reciprocity deficits: Masked through learned conversational scripts and forced reciprocal responses 6
• Nonverbal communicative behaviors: Masked by forcing eye contact, practicing facial expressions, and mimicking gestures despite internal discomfort 6, 1
• Developing and maintaining relationships: Compensatory strategies create the appearance of typical relationship functioning while internal experience remains profoundly different 4

The Compensation Problem in Diagnosis

High compensators present a specific diagnostic challenge:

• Youth with good ADOS scores but poor Theory of Mind (the "High Compensation" group) show stronger vocal expression and overall rapport during assessment, masking their underlying cognitive deficits 4
• This creates false negatives where clinicians observe apparently typical behavior during structured assessment while missing the significant effort and internal distress required to produce that behavior 4

Timing and Detection Issues

Adult-diagnosed individuals report significantly elevated Assimilation and Compensation compared to those diagnosed in childhood/adolescence, suggesting that effective masking directly delays diagnosis 2

The DSM-5 states symptoms must be present in early developmental period but acknowledges they "may not become fully manifest until social demands exceed limited capacities" 6. This creates a catch-22:

• Effective maskers meet social demands through exhausting compensation, so deficits don't become "fully manifest" until burnout occurs 1
• By the time masking fails and symptoms become observable, clinicians may attribute difficulties to other conditions rather than recognizing underlying ASD 7

The "Diagnostic Overshadowing" Risk

The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry warns that when ASD is eventually diagnosed, clinicians may attribute all symptoms to autism and miss comorbid conditions 7. However, the reverse also occurs: when masking is effective, clinicians diagnose only the visible comorbidities (anxiety, depression) while missing the underlying ASD that drives both the comorbidities and the exhausting masking behaviors 5.

Current Debates on DSM-5 Criteria

The fundamental debate centers on observable versus internal experience:

• DSM-5 requires "clinically significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of current functioning" 6
• Masking creates apparent functioning that conceals profound internal impairment and distress 3
• The criteria emphasize deficits in social communication that must be observable across contexts, but masking specifically makes these deficits unobservable during clinical assessment 6, 1

Clinical Implications for Reducing Missed Diagnoses

To address masking-related diagnostic delays:

• Comprehensive assessment must include structured parent interviews about early childhood behaviors before masking strategies developed, not just current observable presentation 7
• Direct observation using standardized measures like ADOS-2 should specifically assess for compensation by comparing observed social behavior against cognitive measures of social understanding 7, 4
• Clinicians should recognize that individuals with preserved verbal abilities and higher education—those most likely to mask effectively—still have ASD despite appearing more "functional" 7
• The presence of exhaustion, burnout, anxiety, and depression in someone with subtle social differences should prompt consideration of masked ASD rather than dismissing ASD due to apparently adequate social functioning 1, 5

The Broader Context

Belief systems impact screening and diagnosis outcomes 8. Cultural factors influence whether behaviors like avoiding eye contact are considered concerning, and families may not report differences if masking makes the child appear typical in clinical settings 8. The heterogeneous presentation and time course of ASD deficits necessitates repeat screening at different ages to detect individuals missed on earlier occasions due to effective masking 8.